Latest Contributions by JayCary

‎01-25-2023

@ammsgis: Thanks for sharing your results and environment. This feature is flagged as an error since a node is within the dangle tolerance and not connected to another feature in the feature class. To all: Would appreciate thoughts on whether polylines that close on themselves should be handled in a different way by the Find Dangles check. Note: The Polyline or Path Closes on Self can be used to find self-closing polylines.

‎01-18-2023

Can you share the details of your configuration? For example, the check settings (input filters, dangle tolerance, dangle tolerance unit of measure, additional features to compare) and spatial reference of the input dataset. You may want to also verify that the polylines are actually snapped to another feature and do not have micro-gaps.

‎01-17-2023

Hi, Depending on your configuration, results from the Must Not Have Dangles topology rule and the Find Dangles check may not be directly comparable. You may want to verify that the Dangle Tolerance parameter makes sense for your data. From the doc: The minimum distance to search for polyline nodes that are not connected to other features. Polyline features with nodes that are within this distance but not connected to other polyline features are returned as an error. The value must be greater than the input data source's x,y tolerance. Jay

‎01-13-2023

@ThomasRickettThanks for sharing additional details on the scenario. The Different Z at Intersection check would support this scenario (albeit using Z-enabled features). Unfortunately, I don't think the Feature on Feature (aka Geometry on Geometry in ArcMap) will work. The check can find polyline boundaries that intersect (spatial relation: DE-9IM (****T****), but comparing the attribute pairs (ToElevation <> FromElevation, FromElevation <> ToElevation) would generate false-positive results.

‎01-04-2023

@AyanPalitAs you mentioned earlier, the Nonlinear Segment check is the best method in Data Reviewer for detecting nonlinear segments in polyline/polygon features. Unfortunately, the current implementation lacks the granularity needed in this scenario.

‎12-05-2022

This sounds like a locale-specific issue when exporting/importing rules from .csv. I would suggest contacting technical support so that we can get a reproducible workflow.

‎12-05-2022

This question might get more responses in the geodatabase board. That said, this might be a good opportunity to suggest an enhancement in the Data Management Ideas site for more control on a GlobalID field.

‎11-28-2022

@Nicolas_GREHANT_IGNFI The ability to interactively configure and execute a Data Reviewer check is on the product roadmap. The current goal is to have an initial release of this capability in the near-term (although that is subject to change). The product roadmap is also a good resource to discover features/capabilities planned for future releases.

‎11-17-2022

There are currently no plans for implementing the Positional Accuracy Assessment Tool (PAAT) in ArcGIS Pro as it was a rarely-used tool in ArcMap. If this tool is critical to your workflow I would suggest creating an idea in the Data Reviewer Ideas place (https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-ideas/idb-p/arcgis-data-reviewer-ideas) to identify how your organization has been using this tool in ArcMap. Thanks!

‎11-01-2022

You might want to check that the datum defined for the Features to Compare data source matches the input dataset (NBAZ_Transactions).

‎10-31-2022

For Z-enabled polylines, you may want to check-out the Different Z at Intersection check to identify polylines that intersect or touch with Z-values outside a defined range. For polylines with Z values stored as an attribute, you may want to check-out the Feature on Feature check. This check can be configured to find polyline features that intersect or touch (Spatial Relationship parameter) and contain attribute values that do not match (Attribute Relationship parameter).

‎10-21-2022

@JosephCarl2The functionality available in the ArcMap Valency check is still on the product roadmap and under review by the team. This would be a great opportunity for users of this check to tell us how they anticipate using it in ArcGIS Pro/ArcGIS Enterprise. For example, are utility customers (historically those who have used this check the most) planning to use this check after migration to the Utility Network. Thanks in advance for the feedback!

‎10-21-2022

@JohnAnderson1I was hoping to follow-up with you regarding other issues your organization has identified on Data Reviewer's checks. Bug IDs would be the most helpful since this will make it easier for the team to review them. Thanks in advance for the feedback.

‎10-17-2022

This might be related to the implementation approach that was taken with the validation attribute rule. Are your validation rules based on Arcade or Data Reviewer's Ready to Use Rules gallery?

‎09-22-2022

Thanks for sharing your workflow! The development team has reproduced this behavior in ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1 and it appears to affect project configurations where Reviewer results are co-located with the data actively being edited. To avoid this issue, please use a separate geodatabase to store your Reviewer results. The team has logged an internal bug for this issue and it will be fixed in the next release of ArcGIS Pro. If needed, please contact technical support to start an incident to document this issue. This will enable you to track the progress of this incident.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	2 weeks ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by JayCary

Re: Atributte Rules doesn't work correctly

Re: Atributte Rules doesn't work correctly

Re: Atributte Rules doesn't work correctly

Re: Check for identical elevation codes at intersecting streets

Re: There needs to be a way to track down and convert Bezier Curves to True Curves in ArcGIS Pro.

Re: Import Attribute Rules crashes... (PRO-2.9.5)

Re: Disable Global ID with Python?

Re: Positional Accuracy Assessment tool in PRO?

Re: Positional Accuracy Assessment tool in PRO?

Re: Pro Attribute Rule - Intersection Count Rule

Re: Check for identical elevation codes at intersecting streets

Re: Checking Valency in ArcGIS Pro

Re: Ready to Use Validation Rule Relationship doesn't update in Error Inspector unless parent record is also edited

Re: In ArcGIS Pro 2.9 Branch Version Error Inspector Evaluate Rules (checked modified in this version) evaluating all the features of the feature clas

Re: ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1: A record in the reviewer results session table disappears as it’s updated when working with data reviewer,

Re: Attribute Rule Import Fails (FGDB, Pro 3.5.2)

Re: How to track transportation assets as events i...

Re: Constraint or validation rule to check that te...

Re: Export Query Attributtes rules

Re: Error of reviewer results

Roads and Highways User Group (RHUG)