Latest Contributions by JayCary

There are a couple of options available in ArcGIS Pro that support a similar workflow as ArcMap's Commit To Reviewer Table tool. The Browse Features tool supports the interactive review of a selection of features and creation of error results for those features that fail review. Alternatively, the Write to Reviewer Table geoprocessing tool supports the creation of error features based on an input feature layer. ... View more

Does this help? The  Data Reviewer based tools (DR itself and "Missing Features" and "Browse Features" of Manage Data Quality) use only the DR schema and that evaluate data quality step (from error inspector or the work flow manager step) only the error layers. For clarification, the following tools in ArcGIS Pro support the Reviewer Workspace: Flag Missing Features Browse Features GP tools (Execute Reviewer Batch Job, Write To Reviewer Table, Create Reviewer Session, Delete Reviewer Session, Enable Data Reviewer)   Can you have both  the DR schema and error layers in the same database? Is this possible with a Branch Versioned gdb? In enterprise? In file/mobile geodatabase, the Reviewer Workspace and attribute rule (AR) error layers should co-exist peacefully. Note: Implementing attribute rules will impact backward compatibility with ArcMap and older versions of ArcGIS Pro. More info can be found here. Reviewer Workspace is not supported in branch versioned enterprise geodatabase and AR error layers are not supported in traditional versioned enterprise geodatabase. In Pro, Data Reviewer requires the setting up a workspace on the database == a schema with tables for track errors e.g. Enable Data Reviewer.  I assume the resulting schema tables  are just like the tables set-up with Data Reviewer with ArcMap. A Reviewer Workspace created in ArcGIS Pro is compatible with ArcMap 10.8x.  To use the Data Quality "Missing Features" and Browse Features tools you need the Data Reviewer license. My understanding is that any errors generated by these 2 tools are written only to the DR schema tables. Correct What are called "Data Reviewer Checks" are equivalent to the "ready to use rules" that show up in the "Attribute Rules tab"? Data Reviewer's checks (documented here) can be configured to implement constraint and validation attribute rules. They are access from the "Ready to Use Rules" gallery in Attribute rules view as outlined here.     Can Data Reviewer run standard attribute rules (written in Arcade) rather than the Reviewer checks? If so where are the errors written; DR schema, or the error layers? In validation attribute rules, there are two implementation patterns (Arcade and Data Reviewer). Regardless of the implementation, rules are evaluated together with resultant error features created in the AR error layers. Note: To evaluate Data Reviewer-based validation attribute rules a Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro (file/mobile geodatabase) or a Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Enterprise license (branch versioned enterprise geodatabase) is required. From the Error Inspector running the evaluate data quality command  the output for either a ready to use rule or a standard arcade validation rule are written to the error layers. They have different life cycle behavior. This is as-designed. Is there a way to import/export they error layers into the DR schema or visa versa? Importing AR error features to a Reviewer Workspace should be possible using the Write to Reviewer Table GP tool. Custom code will be required to translate an AR error feature's FeatureClassID value to the corresponding Feature/object class name. Importing Reviewer Workspace error features to AR error layers is not supported since these tables are system-managed to maintain consistency between rules and their error features. ... View more