Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About JayCary
JayCary
Esri Contributor
since
07-04-2014
yesterday
161
Posts created
26
Kudos given
19
Solutions
72
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(0 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by JayCary
|
POST
|
Hi, Depending on your configuration, results from the Must Not Have Dangles topology rule and the Find Dangles check may not be directly comparable. You may want to verify that the Dangle Tolerance parameter makes sense for your data. From the doc: The minimum distance to search for polyline nodes that are not connected to other features. Polyline features with nodes that are within this distance but not connected to other polyline features are returned as an error. The value must be greater than the input data source's x,y tolerance. Jay
... View more
01-17-2023
09:45 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1555
|
|
POST
|
@ThomasRickettThanks for sharing additional details on the scenario. The Different Z at Intersection check would support this scenario (albeit using Z-enabled features). Unfortunately, I don't think the Feature on Feature (aka Geometry on Geometry in ArcMap) will work. The check can find polyline boundaries that intersect (spatial relation: DE-9IM (****T****), but comparing the attribute pairs (ToElevation <> FromElevation, FromElevation <> ToElevation) would generate false-positive results.
... View more
01-13-2023
03:30 PM
|
0
|
0
|
476
|
|
IDEA
|
@AyanPalitAs you mentioned earlier, the Nonlinear Segment check is the best method in Data Reviewer for detecting nonlinear segments in polyline/polygon features. Unfortunately, the current implementation lacks the granularity needed in this scenario.
... View more
01-04-2023
03:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1307
|
|
POST
|
This sounds like a locale-specific issue when exporting/importing rules from .csv. I would suggest contacting technical support so that we can get a reproducible workflow.
... View more
12-05-2022
03:56 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1035
|
|
POST
|
This question might get more responses in the geodatabase board. That said, this might be a good opportunity to suggest an enhancement in the Data Management Ideas site for more control on a GlobalID field.
... View more
12-05-2022
03:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
685
|
|
POST
|
@Nicolas_GREHANT_IGNFI The ability to interactively configure and execute a Data Reviewer check is on the product roadmap. The current goal is to have an initial release of this capability in the near-term (although that is subject to change). The product roadmap is also a good resource to discover features/capabilities planned for future releases.
... View more
11-28-2022
02:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1010
|
|
POST
|
There are currently no plans for implementing the Positional Accuracy Assessment Tool (PAAT) in ArcGIS Pro as it was a rarely-used tool in ArcMap. If this tool is critical to your workflow I would suggest creating an idea in the Data Reviewer Ideas place (https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-ideas/idb-p/arcgis-data-reviewer-ideas) to identify how your organization has been using this tool in ArcMap. Thanks!
... View more
11-17-2022
02:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1029
|
|
POST
|
You might want to check that the datum defined for the Features to Compare data source matches the input dataset (NBAZ_Transactions).
... View more
11-01-2022
11:58 AM
|
1
|
1
|
573
|
|
POST
|
For Z-enabled polylines, you may want to check-out the Different Z at Intersection check to identify polylines that intersect or touch with Z-values outside a defined range. For polylines with Z values stored as an attribute, you may want to check-out the Feature on Feature check. This check can be configured to find polyline features that intersect or touch (Spatial Relationship parameter) and contain attribute values that do not match (Attribute Relationship parameter).
... View more
10-31-2022
02:09 PM
|
1
|
0
|
557
|
|
POST
|
@JosephCarl2The functionality available in the ArcMap Valency check is still on the product roadmap and under review by the team. This would be a great opportunity for users of this check to tell us how they anticipate using it in ArcGIS Pro/ArcGIS Enterprise. For example, are utility customers (historically those who have used this check the most) planning to use this check after migration to the Utility Network. Thanks in advance for the feedback!
... View more
10-21-2022
03:51 PM
|
0
|
0
|
833
|
|
POST
|
@JohnAnderson1I was hoping to follow-up with you regarding other issues your organization has identified on Data Reviewer's checks. Bug IDs would be the most helpful since this will make it easier for the team to review them. Thanks in advance for the feedback.
... View more
10-21-2022
03:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
347
|
|
POST
|
This might be related to the implementation approach that was taken with the validation attribute rule. Are your validation rules based on Arcade or Data Reviewer's Ready to Use Rules gallery?
... View more
10-17-2022
10:08 AM
|
0
|
2
|
780
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for sharing your workflow! The development team has reproduced this behavior in ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1 and it appears to affect project configurations where Reviewer results are co-located with the data actively being edited. To avoid this issue, please use a separate geodatabase to store your Reviewer results. The team has logged an internal bug for this issue and it will be fixed in the next release of ArcGIS Pro. If needed, please contact technical support to start an incident to document this issue. This will enable you to track the progress of this incident.
... View more
09-22-2022
01:43 PM
|
1
|
0
|
748
|
|
POST
|
From the Duplicate Feature check doc: The purpose of the Duplicate Feature check is to find features that contain duplicated geometry and attribute values. By default, this check compares a feature's geometry and attribute values (in matching/user-editable fields) to determine whether a feature is duplicate. System-maintained fields (i.e. ObjectID, GlobalID, etc) are ignored. In this example, OID 342 and 343 are not duplicates since they do not have matching StreetNumber values.
... View more
09-20-2022
04:16 PM
|
1
|
0
|
760
|
|
POST
|
The Duplicate Feature check and the Must Not Overlap topology rule are used to detect completely different error scenarios and their results cannot be compared. Could you clarify your goal in comparing these two workflows?
... View more
09-19-2022
04:43 PM
|
1
|
0
|
775
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 02-23-2024 02:34 PM | |
| 1 | 10-31-2023 08:59 AM | |
| 1 | 02-24-2023 03:04 PM | |
| 1 | 01-25-2023 10:58 AM | |
| 1 | 11-01-2022 11:58 AM |
Activity Feed
- Posted Re: Browse Features on ArcGIS Pro Questions. Monday
- Posted Re: Sort and Filter Fields in ArcGIS Pro Data Reviewer Error Inspector Table - Status changed to: Under Consideration on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 2 weeks ago
- Posted Re: Data Reviewer Version Differences on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 3 weeks ago
- Posted Re: Compare attributes to nearby features - Status changed to: Already Offered on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 06-06-2024 02:50 PM
- Posted Re: ArcGIS 3.0.1: Having an option to enable\add the “reviewer results” for a particular geodatabase by right clicking, - Status changed to: Closed on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 05-30-2024 10:38 AM
- Posted Re: Compare attributes to nearby features - Status changed to: Needs Clarification on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 05-30-2024 10:15 AM
- Posted Re: Zoom to each feature's extent when using the Browse Features tool - Status changed to: In Product Plan on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 05-28-2024 01:47 PM
- Posted Re: Select each feature when using the Browse Features tool - Status changed to: In Product Plan on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 05-28-2024 01:46 PM
- Kudoed Duplicate Layout for WalkerKB. 05-08-2024 05:08 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Attribute Rule in a Utility Network - Intersect geometries. 04-08-2024 09:51 PM
- Posted Re: Topology Class and Validation Rules/Data Reviewer in Same Database on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 04-02-2024 12:32 PM
- Posted Re: Evaluate polygon, perimeter and Area Validation rule - Not calculating area correctly on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 03-19-2024 01:38 PM
- Posted Re: Only able to run one Ready to Use "Query Attributes" rule. Additional Query Attribute rules do not work on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 03-07-2024 02:26 PM
- Kudoed Re: Only able to run one Ready to Use "Query Attributes" rule. Additional Query Attribute rules do not work for MarkZweifler1. 03-07-2024 02:20 PM
- Posted Re: Only able to run one Ready to Use "Query Attributes" rule. Additional Query Attribute rules do not work on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 03-05-2024 03:47 PM
- Posted Re: Add functionality to work with non-spatial tables on Attribute Rules Ideas. 02-26-2024 10:45 AM
- Posted Re: Add functionality to work with non-spatial tables on Attribute Rules Ideas. 02-26-2024 08:43 AM
- Posted Re: Attribute Rule in a Utility Network - Intersect geometries on ArcGIS Pro Questions. 02-23-2024 02:34 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Help with Data Reviewer for the complete beginner. 01-21-2024 09:32 PM
- Posted Re: ArcGIS Data Reviewer Roadmap (February 2023) on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Documents. 01-17-2024 01:40 PM
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|