Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About JayCary
JayCary
Esri Contributor
since
07-04-2014
Thursday
196
Posts created
32
Kudos given
25
Solutions
82
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(0 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by JayCary
|
POST
|
This sounds like a locale-specific issue when exporting/importing rules from .csv. I would suggest contacting technical support so that we can get a reproducible workflow.
... View more
12-05-2022
03:56 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2771
|
|
POST
|
This question might get more responses in the geodatabase board. That said, this might be a good opportunity to suggest an enhancement in the Data Management Ideas site for more control on a GlobalID field.
... View more
12-05-2022
03:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2499
|
|
POST
|
@Nicolas_GREHANT_IGNFI The ability to interactively configure and execute a Data Reviewer check is on the product roadmap. The current goal is to have an initial release of this capability in the near-term (although that is subject to change). The product roadmap is also a good resource to discover features/capabilities planned for future releases.
... View more
11-28-2022
02:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2655
|
|
POST
|
There are currently no plans for implementing the Positional Accuracy Assessment Tool (PAAT) in ArcGIS Pro as it was a rarely-used tool in ArcMap. If this tool is critical to your workflow I would suggest creating an idea in the Data Reviewer Ideas place (https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-ideas/idb-p/arcgis-data-reviewer-ideas) to identify how your organization has been using this tool in ArcMap. Thanks!
... View more
11-17-2022
02:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2674
|
|
POST
|
You might want to check that the datum defined for the Features to Compare data source matches the input dataset (NBAZ_Transactions).
... View more
11-01-2022
11:58 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1487
|
|
POST
|
For Z-enabled polylines, you may want to check-out the Different Z at Intersection check to identify polylines that intersect or touch with Z-values outside a defined range. For polylines with Z values stored as an attribute, you may want to check-out the Feature on Feature check. This check can be configured to find polyline features that intersect or touch (Spatial Relationship parameter) and contain attribute values that do not match (Attribute Relationship parameter).
... View more
10-31-2022
02:09 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1724
|
|
POST
|
@JosephCarl2The functionality available in the ArcMap Valency check is still on the product roadmap and under review by the team. This would be a great opportunity for users of this check to tell us how they anticipate using it in ArcGIS Pro/ArcGIS Enterprise. For example, are utility customers (historically those who have used this check the most) planning to use this check after migration to the Utility Network. Thanks in advance for the feedback!
... View more
10-21-2022
03:51 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2446
|
|
POST
|
@JohnAnderson1I was hoping to follow-up with you regarding other issues your organization has identified on Data Reviewer's checks. Bug IDs would be the most helpful since this will make it easier for the team to review them. Thanks in advance for the feedback.
... View more
10-21-2022
03:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
880
|
|
POST
|
This might be related to the implementation approach that was taken with the validation attribute rule. Are your validation rules based on Arcade or Data Reviewer's Ready to Use Rules gallery?
... View more
10-17-2022
10:08 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2253
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for sharing your workflow! The development team has reproduced this behavior in ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1 and it appears to affect project configurations where Reviewer results are co-located with the data actively being edited. To avoid this issue, please use a separate geodatabase to store your Reviewer results. The team has logged an internal bug for this issue and it will be fixed in the next release of ArcGIS Pro. If needed, please contact technical support to start an incident to document this issue. This will enable you to track the progress of this incident.
... View more
09-22-2022
01:43 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2560
|
|
POST
|
From the Duplicate Feature check doc: The purpose of the Duplicate Feature check is to find features that contain duplicated geometry and attribute values. By default, this check compares a feature's geometry and attribute values (in matching/user-editable fields) to determine whether a feature is duplicate. System-maintained fields (i.e. ObjectID, GlobalID, etc) are ignored. In this example, OID 342 and 343 are not duplicates since they do not have matching StreetNumber values.
... View more
09-20-2022
04:16 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2521
|
|
POST
|
The Duplicate Feature check and the Must Not Overlap topology rule are used to detect completely different error scenarios and their results cannot be compared. Could you clarify your goal in comparing these two workflows?
... View more
09-19-2022
04:43 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2536
|
|
POST
|
Hi, The Unique Field Value check appears to be working as expected (ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1) when used with the sample data (Z91.zip). Note: The data contained in Z91.zip does not appear to be the same as that depicted in the above screenshot. For example, the AlTirahStreets feature class contained only one rule (New Duplicate Feature Rule) and the features with duplicate STREETNUMBER values are different. I completed the following steps to verify that the check is correctly ignoring the VALIDATIONSTATUS field during evaluation: Modify a feature (oid 348) to create a duplicate STREETNUMBER (<NULL> to 1) value. Modified feature's VALIDATIONSTATUS changes from NO VALIDATION REQUIRED to VALIDATION REQUIRED. Click Evaluate features command (using Full Extent option). New errors identified where feature contains STREETNUMBER = 1 and VALIDATIONSTATUS equal either NO VALIDATION REQUIRED or VALIDATION REQUIRED VALIDATIONSTATUS updated to NO VALIDATION REQUIRED, HAS ERROR(S) If your results are different, I would suggest contacting technical support for additional troubleshooting. Thanks!
... View more
09-19-2022
09:45 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1396
|
|
POST
|
Hi, The values used in the REVIEWERCODE field is not currently documented. Could you provide some background/examples of how you are using them in your workflow? Thanks in advance for the feedback!
... View more
09-19-2022
09:00 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1592
|
|
POST
|
Thanks-much for the clarification! I would suggest turning-off your error layers to ensure that you are not accidentally deleting the error feature during your edit.
... View more
09-16-2022
04:07 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2606
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 2 | 06-29-2026 01:08 PM | |
| 1 | 08-05-2025 10:53 AM | |
| 1 | 07-10-2025 05:23 PM | |
| 1 | 07-10-2025 10:43 AM |
Activity Feed
- Kudoed Re: Deprecation of Functionality in ArcGIS Data Reviewer for JohnAnderson1. Thursday
- Got a Kudo for Re: Deprecation of Functionality in ArcGIS Data Reviewer. Sunday
- Posted Re: Deprecation of Functionality in ArcGIS Data Reviewer on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Blog. a week ago
- Posted Re: Question on Qcing two layers against each other with Attribute rules via validation on Attribute Rules Questions. 2 weeks ago
- Kudoed New Tool for Analyzing Attribute Rule Performance with ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Jaspar_Saadi-Klein. 4 weeks ago
- Kudoed New Tools for Evaluating Large Datasets with ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Jaspar_Saadi-Klein. 4 weeks ago
- Got a Kudo for ArcGIS Data Reviewer Roadmap (Q2 2026). 07-02-2026 07:56 AM
- Got a Kudo for ArcGIS Data Reviewer Roadmap (Q2 2026). 06-30-2026 02:06 PM
- Posted Re: View only Fields in Attribute Sets w/ UN features - Status changed to: Under Consideration on ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing Ideas. 06-29-2026 04:23 PM
- Posted ArcGIS Data Reviewer Roadmap (Q2 2026) on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Documents. 06-29-2026 01:08 PM
- Posted Re: ArcGIS Pro Error Inspector - Source Layer Filter - Status changed to: Implemented on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 06-23-2026 05:01 PM
- Posted Re: Incorporate Structure Line into APR - Status changed to: Under Consideration on ArcGIS Pipeline Referencing Ideas. 06-23-2026 02:39 PM
- Posted Re: Need some help converting old Geometry on Geometry checks on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 04-08-2026 05:16 PM
- Posted Re: Composite Rule Check - Ability to make an 'OR' composite rule - Status changed to: Needs Clarification on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 04-02-2026 10:39 AM
- Posted Re: Need some help converting old Geometry on Geometry checks on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 04-02-2026 10:20 AM
- Posted Re: Configure Ready To Use Rules to use the same error managment lifecycle as Arcade Attribute Rules - Status changed to: Under Consideration on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 04-02-2026 09:58 AM
- Posted Re: Attribute Rule Import Fails (FGDB, Pro 3.5.2) on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions. 01-29-2026 04:28 PM
- Posted Re: Identify segments that are true curves and the curve properties on ArcGIS Pro Questions. 12-02-2025 03:39 PM
- Posted Re: Check for "Changed Features Only" on Attribute Rules Ideas. 11-18-2025 03:10 PM
- Posted Re: Enable keyboard shortcut for "Enter Verification Status" (Data Reviewer) - Status changed to: Closed on ArcGIS Data Reviewer Ideas. 10-03-2025 09:35 AM
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|