|
POST
|
The inclusion of "memory" in the layer name makes me think the OP is trying to create something in an in-memory workspace. Make Feature Layer always creates a temporary layer, and that layer is not stored in an in-memory workspace. The Delete tool likely is looking in an in-memory workspace given the path passed, and since feature layers aren't stored in an in-memory workspace, nothing is there to delete. I think the tools are not being used correctly, which is causing confusion for them.
... View more
09-15-2025
12:29 PM
|
1
|
4
|
508
|
|
POST
|
Lessons learned? Since you didn't say where exactly you are deploying, e.g., on-prem or in a cloud, it is hard to provide specifics. What I would say is make sure you really need high-availability before deploying it. What I have seen numerous times are "high-availability" deployments that have multiple single points of failure so they are high availability in name but not in reality. Doing truly highly available deployments comes with a non-trivial cost.
... View more
09-13-2025
02:26 PM
|
2
|
0
|
1098
|
|
POST
|
Start by looking at ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript Life Cycle. The oldest supported version is 4.24, which supports down to Safari 14, but that version of the SDK also is retired on 12/01/2025. ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript 4.27 was the last version to support Safari 15, and it doesn't retire until 11/01/2026, so that is probably your best bet for now. Although Apple sometimes backports critical security patches to unsupported versions of iOS, it isn't guaranteed, and Apple currently supports iOS 18 and newer. Supporting unsupported software is one thing, doing new development on unsupported software is something else entirely.
... View more
09-08-2025
06:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
214
|
|
POST
|
This is by far the best workaround currently available at Pro 3.5. I will say, the minimum webmap definition needed to get ConvertWebMapToArcGISProject to work is: {"mapOptions":{"extent":{}}}
... View more
08-26-2025
10:50 AM
|
2
|
0
|
396
|
|
POST
|
How frequently is this happening, that is the best bar to use for deciding whether it it worth chasing down the issue. If it is happening daily or multiple times a week, then it is probably worth looking into. If it is happening every couple or few weeks or months, I personally would not spend the cycles chasing it down. Then again, maybe you have a whole lot more free time on your hands than I do. Regarding the setting itself, it depends. If the service is optimized well and response times are < 5 seconds, then getting timeouts indicate you are getting a lot of traffic and adding more SOCs is probably the better approach. If the service's performance is poor, averaging half the timeout or more, then I usually push back on the service publisher to improve either the data structure, map structure, or both. Although one can throw resources at a poor performing service by increasing SOCs and timeouts, that is usually treating the symptoms and not the root cause.
... View more
08-26-2025
07:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
846
|
|
POST
|
Did this work with previous versions of ArcGIS Pro? What OS is the user running?
... View more
08-12-2025
03:37 PM
|
0
|
1
|
645
|
|
POST
|
Did you publish this exact same dataset to ArcGIS Online using Pro 2.9, or were you speaking in general about pushing to ArcGIS Online from Pro 2.9? If this dataset was copied or created with a newer version of ArcGIS Pro, it might be one of the datasets has an incompatible data type.
... View more
08-11-2025
06:25 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1690
|
|
POST
|
The maximum running instances setting is per machine/node of an ArcGIS Server site. If you have a site with 2 machines and a max of 4, then it is possible to have up to 8 running across the site. Are you running a multi-machine site?
... View more
08-11-2025
06:21 AM
|
0
|
1
|
501
|
|
POST
|
Have you read 00396: The dataset version is later than is supported by your server. Minimum version: <value> - ArcGIS Pro | Documentation ? That kind of error message is more common when publishing to ArcGIS Enterprise, but one can run into it with ArcGIS Online in specific situations.
... View more
08-10-2025
06:43 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1741
|
|
POST
|
Unless there is a known defect and someone finds a reference to it, responses will be limited unless you can share either sample or representative data that generates the same results.
... View more
08-02-2025
07:37 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1214
|
|
POST
|
Assuming you didn't build this workstation yourself from various components, try the latest graphics drivers from the vendor and not Nvidia. The GPU may be Nvidia, but there is a reason vendors often release their certified versions of graphics drivers.
... View more
07-31-2025
06:56 AM
|
1
|
2
|
945
|
|
POST
|
Secrets management options vary by OS/platform. Are you running the script from Windows, Linux, etc...?
... View more
07-30-2025
09:23 AM
|
0
|
1
|
360
|
|
IDEA
|
Twelve years and still waiting.... I would say still hoping, but I think I have given up hope. The need for this has been covered by earlier comments, so I won't repeat them again.
... View more
07-28-2025
01:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
508
|
|
POST
|
The Esri Support website does allow and work on searching bug numbers. In this case, your search is not finding the defect because Esri has not publicly released the defect. Defects logged through Esri Support do not automatically get made public, and some never get made public although most do. I would wait another 2-4 weeks and check again.
... View more
07-25-2025
01:31 PM
|
1
|
1
|
298
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | 4 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 11-03-2025 08:26 AM | |
| 1 | 10-22-2025 12:57 PM | |
| 2 | 10-13-2025 02:00 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Friday
|