|
IDEA
|
Edit sessions in arcpy are monitored at the workspace level using functions like arcpy.IsBeingEdited(workspace) Script tools are aware of any edits performed via an edit session in the app - both edited attributes and modified features should be in sync from the app to your script tool's execution code. The script execution should be aware of those new attributes and features. This simple execution test code shows that after starting editing, creating a new feature, the messages from execute indicate the workspace is being edited and the new features are available in the cursor. Execution sample: import arcpy
in_features = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0)
workspace = arcpy.Describe(in_features).path
# Return True/False message about the edit session
arcpy.AddMessage(f"Workspace containing input features ~{in_features}~ is in an Edit Session: {arcpy.IsBeingEdited(workspace)}")
count = 0
with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(in_features, ["OID@"]) as scur:
for row in scur:
count+=1
# Return count message to show new features from the edit session are available to the cursor
arcpy.AddMessage(f"Count of records in input features using cursor: {count}")
Here are the output messages before doing the edits: Workspace containing input features ~Devices~ is in an Edit Session: False Count of records in input features using cursor: 3 And the messages after creating features using interactive editing tools (edits are still pending, not saved or discarded) Workspace containing input features ~Devices~ is in an Edit Session: True Count of records in input features using cursor: 4
... View more
Friday
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
|
IDEA
|
This defect was resolved in ArcGIS Pro 3.6: https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug/in-arcgis-pro-31-file-geodatabase-connections-on-networ-bug-000160252 If there are additional cases related to this, please let us know
... View more
04-16-2026
04:33 PM
|
0
|
0
|
407
|
|
IDEA
|
04-16-2026
04:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
130
|
|
IDEA
|
03-19-2026
09:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
269
|
|
IDEA
|
It is unlikely that Arcade expressions will be broadly supported as an alternative to individual fields in all or many geoprocessing tools, due to the per-tool implementation/development cost that would need to be done per tool. There are other enhancement ideas for some specific tools, for example Append using an expression language for field mapping, which are being tracked as development issues: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/enhance-append-tool-to-allow-python-arcade/idi-p/1195885 For more broad support, we would need the entire ArcGIS system to support data reading via cursors that can do the Arcade evaluation natively, rather than at the per-tool implementation level. I'd like to refer you to this existing enhancement Idea for virtual fields that are configured and stored at the layer level and could be broadly used across ArcGIS: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/virtual-attributes-ad-hoc/idi-p/1276471
... View more
02-19-2026
02:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
689
|
|
IDEA
|
@AmberConverse The Community needs an idea champion to log the new idea to control the behavior from an option. Then let the voting commence!
... View more
02-19-2026
11:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1201
|
|
POST
|
@ZachEdwards_WDSGIS , if other software packages are able to extract the coordinates, but arcpy.GetImageEXIFProperties() fails, that is definitely a defect and I would like the opportunity to try to review and fix this case. Would appreciate an email with example image if possible.
... View more
01-23-2026
03:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1985
|
|
POST
|
Hi @ZachEdwards_WDSGIS can you see the comment above with troubleshooting using the arcpy.GetImageEXIFProperties() function? If this function does not work with your image, there may be a problem with the image or with the function. Esri Support would be able to help troubleshoot this. Or you can email me a sample image that causes an error for Esri development to investigate. [email protected]
... View more
01-23-2026
12:44 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1992
|
|
IDEA
|
It is not likely to be delivered as an excel spreadsheet like available in this Esri Community thread, but the ArcGIS Pro team is planning a documentation page or formal resource for seeing a licensing break down for all geoprocessing tools.
... View more
01-05-2026
11:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1402
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi @HeatherAlexander The Contour tool in ArcGIS Pro provides a Contour Type parameter to create polygons (filled contour lines) directly. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/contour.htm Can you explain how this may not match your request? About Feature To Polygon, it is true that this tool does not maintain attribute information without post processing, and we are working on an enhancement to resolve that, ENH-000132387.
... View more
12-19-2025
09:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
947
|
|
IDEA
|
12-17-2025
12:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
453
|
|
IDEA
|
@Jeff-Reinhart only a subset of options are available in the Pro admin settings system, not including the option referenced above. Yes a new ArcGIS Pro Idea would be suitable in this case, and we should be able to prioritize it in the near term with your justification of how your organization will benefit from applying (and potentially locking) that option at the admin level (across many analyst machines for the org). Some of the options are quite logical why an admin would want to set it, but opening the messages seems like something more suitable to the individual user's preference. But I look forward to discussing that further in the new Idea 🙂
... View more
11-20-2025
11:05 PM
|
0
|
0
|
338
|
|
IDEA
|
@HaydeeHY This enhancement Idea is in the development team's Near Term backlog. A new tool for KML conversion, KML To Geodatabase, will be released in ArcGIS Pro 3.6 for enhanced attribute handling. Any enhancements like this one that were logged for KML To Layer will only be developed for the new tool going forward.
... View more
11-12-2025
11:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
586
|
|
IDEA
|
@RTPL_AU @paleo78 just to reinforce, this is not normal behavior and is a bug. This documentation is being added in Pro 3.6 to the Find a geoprocessing tool topic: "The first time you access a tool or any interface that uses geoprocessing, the geoprocessing cache is automatically created. The cache is used by search and is created once per software release. Creating the geoprocessing cache typically completes in a few seconds on a machine that meets the ArcGIS Pro system requirements. If you have a language pack or Semantic Search installed, creating the cache may take longer, but it should still finish within one minute." I am going to explore the impact of Xtools on cache creation. If they are injecting additional system and custom project tools, that will increase the time, and if it is failing in some way to generate a full cache, that may be attempted repeatedly for each Pro session.
... View more
10-02-2025
04:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3668
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 03-22-2024 09:27 AM | |
| 2 | 03-08-2024 01:56 PM | |
| 3 | 02-21-2024 11:58 AM | |
| 1 | 05-09-2023 02:24 PM | |
| 3 | 02-27-2023 05:23 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Friday
|