Latest Contributions by DavidColey

Ok thanks for this @TonghuiMing, I needed time to understand what you were trying to communicate. I have started a support case and am meeting with an analyst today to demonstrate the behavior. Case number 04125481 for our Org 16502. ... View more

More - it would appear that for CHAR data type attributes - if the attribute is not a Text Coded Value Domain list - then there is a limit of 10? values that will populate the Unique predefined list builder tool when trying to construct a Unique Pre-Defined list for an "Is any of" query type. Otherwise, I have to use an "Is" query type to build Unique Pre-Defined list for a non-domained attribute value list. @TonghuiMing  ... View more

Ok - It would appear that, as long as the attribute value type that I want to use as a multi-value filter selection is a CHAR (text, whatever) that I can build pre-defined lists for the 'Is any of' query type and those values do populate both the query list configuration tool and then do appear as part of the Filter UI drop down for selections, and then those selections do work.  Not ideal and this does not work for INT data types (like Subtypes) - but, for this application, better than me maintaining identical Enterprise-hosted  and ArcGIS Online-hosted feature layers. ... View more

More - this is clearly not an issue for the webmap and the Instant Apps.   The web map and the Instant apps are certainly not affected.  The webmap still properly displays an ‘Includes’ filter where the unique values are visible and selectable, as does the Filter widget in the Sidebar instant app, with the Sidebar filter displaying the unique values to the user for selection. For this application this is big deal for us.  The UI for the 'Is' selection type is barely usable on a mobile device and is not a suitable workaround. In fact, the only workaround I see for now will be for me to maintain ArcGIS Online hosted versions of the layers that I am using for this widget.  That is a lot of work for this application.  Please fix this as soon as possible. ... View more

@TonghuiMing - I would reach out if I knew what I was asking for, but I don't.  Are you telling me that in this portion of the get request: .../0/query?f=json&returnIdsOnly=true&returnCountOnly=true&outFields=petitiontype&returnDistinctValues=true&... should be: .../0/query?f=json&returnCountOnly=true&returnIdsOnly=true&outFields=petitiontype&returnDistinctValues=true&... If so, it did not seem to matter when I just physically changed the order in the request and pasted it into the browser.  The json return looks the same. I don't understand how the Filters' SQL query configuration can get a correct syntax REST 'read' and display the proper choice list, but somehow when presented in the UI form the list disappears?  I'm sorry but I don't get it, and I cannot be the only person that creates their experiences with enterprise hosted feature layers sourced from a distributed collaboration. How can that be a server side issue? Update - you should also be aware that if setting a query as 'Is any of' on an Integer field, the filter configuration tool no longer reads ANY values to pick from.... Thanks   ... View more

Yup, so there you go.  If the webmap basemap is using an ArcGIS Online web mercator basemap like the World Topo you will not get proper results because, like  posted above, the outstanding work by  @MDB_GIS does not - nor should it have to - account for a geographic transformation.  For NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Florida West FIPS 0902 (US Feet) I use the NAD_1983_HARN_To_WGS_1984_2 transformation in the Pro desktop software. Below, I have a StatePlane Florida West vector tile layer that I have used as the webmaps basemap, and you can see that the coordinate expression is a pretty good match: Hope this helps ... View more

Looks to me like this was first reported at 3.4.0 and it is still present at 3.6.2.  High Precision date fields cannot be used in Editor Tracking.  The only solution remains the work around of adding low precision date fields, but it sure is a pain. ... View more

My guess is is that the webmaps' basemap must also be in the same WKID, but I don't know yet ... View more

Hmm, I can tell you guys that last week I modified the projection parameters for WKID 2882: Projected Coordinate System NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Florida West FIPS 0902 (US Feet) Projection Transverse Mercator WKID 2882 Authority EPSG Linear Unit US Survey Feet 0.3048006096012192 False Easting 656166.6666666665 False Northing 0.0 Central Meridian -82.0 Scale Factor 0.9999411764705882 Latitude Of Origin 24.33333333333333 and tested the expression in an ArcGIS Pro 3.6.2 field calculation expressions for lat and then for lon. I then ran the Calculate Geometry tool and the results matched. Both my layer and the pro map coordinate system for this test are in WKID 2882.  I plan on setting up the expressions for the web map edit form and testing against a web mercator basemap this week in both the webmap and in Field Maps. ... View more

So it turns out that since sometime around December of 2025 - for any new group I create and enable 'Open Data' access for our org, none of the content - regardless of type - is visible to the Open Data site, again regardless of whether or not I can see the content in the workspaces>Groups. So the only content that is visible is what is contained in our older groups.  If I can't add and remove groups from Open Data, then we are in trouble. ... View more

Hello @AndrewTurner - FYI began a support case for this issue caseNumber=04116030 for our org County of Sarasota 16502.  Initial tests with support did not yield any changes.... that is, we tried adding a new group through online and enabling open data, added a pdf doc to that group, and while everything reads as it should through Hub workspaces and in the Content Catalog, the document contained in the newly-added group does not appear in the Open Data front-end... @ReannaUn  @ReannaUnwalla  ... View more

Thank you for the reply @AndrewTurner  -  I see the group as visible in my Hub workspace for our Open Data Site located at: https://data-sarco.opendata.arcgis.com The group is designated in ArcGIS Online for the Group Settings as: "Allow this group to be accessed in Open Data sites." checked on. In the hub workspace, I do not see the 1,327 pdf files as part of the 'Content':   I do however see the pdf content when I toggle down to the Groups:   so as you can see here, this Group which participates in the Open Data site contains 1,327 pdf documents thus far, yet no longer shows this content in the Open Data Site....   Thanks for your assistance... ... View more

Yeah making that change as a Rest api update from the admin page is essentially the same as using the arcgis api for python where you go in and update a value for a feature layer using an update dictionary: updateDict = {'maxRecordCount': 4000, 'capabilities': 'Query,Extract'} portFL = FeatureLayerCollection.fromitem(portItem) print (portItem.title) portFL.manager.update_definition(updateDict) https://developers.arcgis.com/python/latest/api-reference/arcgis.features.managers.html#arcgis.features.managers.FeatureLayerManager setting the value here doesn't change anything, it has to be set when the service or feature layer is published. Then if the service is overwritten by say the arcpy sharing module for featureSharing draft: sddraft.maxRecordCount = 4000 https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/arcpy/sharing/featuresharingdraft-class.htm it is very frustrating that the 'update definition' does nothing - updating the feature layer definition will change the maxRecordCount for a hosted feature service in 3 places - but not for the feature service portion itself. Anyone can feel free to correct me. ... View more