Latest Contributions by MichaelVolz

Does the computer you are using for this process at least meet minimum requirements? If this process is memory intensive you may need a computer well above the ArcGIS Pro minimum requirements. ... View more

Bernie: I tried to just have Query on Feature Access with a file gdb data source and that is the error that I reported earlier. ... View more

The service publishing process will throw an error {Layer's data source is not supported (Feature Services)} when you try to enable feature access for a file geodatabase.  Until ESRI makes this possible, it seems like Feature Access should be disabled on that screen if a file geodatabase is the data source. ... View more

Can you provide a screenshot of the error message? ... View more

Hi Cathy: I hope this response is not information overload.  I will divide the response into 3 sections. Lack of control over which edit operations generate Historic Parcels Clip, Merge, and Delete generate Historic Parcels, but Align Parcels does not Due to the frequently erratic and terrible output of the Align Parcels tool, it’s often necessary to fix the alignment issues between new parcel(s) and existing surrounding ones by using a series of Clip & Merge operations – all of which are generating a plethora of intermediate Historic Parcels all the while If Historic Parcels are to be of any real use, they need to be “clean” – that is, they should ideally only contain the original pre-edit state of the parcel, and nothing more As a result, it’s now incumbent upon the parcel editor to manually clean-up the contents of Historic Parcels, deleting both the polygon and line features of those intermediate states which were captured This process is exceedingly tedious to say the least, and made worse by how easy it is to select features which may be shared by other active/current parcels – and which, if accidentally deleted, will directly result in topology validation errors which, in turn, must be fixed   Incomplete Undo results Most noticeable when attempting to Undo bad output from the Align Parcels tool, it is almost always the case that it will not fully undo all of the numerous operations within that edit transaction chain i.e. certain lines and points which were Retired By Record do not get un-retired, creating either extra or missing lines that lead to topo issues when parcels are rebuilt The only work around is to Save often and fully Discard any edit operations w/ bad results, and retry the edit   Questionable use of Historic Parcels ESRI’s own best practices dictates that general users not be given direct access to the Parcel Fabric – parcel editors alone are to have access to the controller dataset as it exists in the Enterprise environment Rather, downstream GIS users/consumers of the parcel data are to access derived feature class(es) – including any need for Historic Parcels Since Historic Parcels are queried by date/time stamp, this means that users would need to request a given output Historic Parcels layer (likely in a FGDB) to use, creating a new management workflow to handle these new derivative datasets At minimum, any real use of Historic Parcels is clunky at best, as the people most likely to want to see/use them are the very people who can’t access the Fabric directly ... View more

Is there anything special about this data set compared to other data sets where you do not see the issue (e.g. maybe it is part of a utility network)? ... View more

Is this all or nothing as it would be nice if it could be done on individual layers? ... View more

Have you looked at Arcade to perform this automatic task possibly also needing Attribute Rules? ... View more

So is the account that runs the various services on the 4 VMs (Portal, Server, Web server, and Data Store) the same?  I'm not familiar with a Web server service, but the other 3 services in my distributed environment are the same. I ran into this issue myself and found that I was running webgisdr with a specific admin account as per ESRI documentation, but webgisdr was writing to the output folder with the account I was running the services under which did not have the proper write permissions. Could it be the case that there are 2 accounts involved here and you did not provide write permissions to the correct account? ... View more

When you test the model in Pro is it going to a local drive or network drive? I ask because I had python scripts that used to write to a network drive, but with an upgrade it started returning non- consistent results like what you are seeing.  When I changed the script to write to a local drive I got the same correct results every time. I hope this info helps your troubleshooting. ... View more

Do they run under the same account?  If so, you can sort them on Log On As to alleviate this problem. ... View more

So when I change the sandbox version to 4.28 in both Chrome and Edge the single point features still disappear when zoomed in, so its behaving differently for me.  These single point features only persist if I first zoom in very close to a clustered feature with a label of at least 2. ... View more

This is very strange. Just curious where in the code it knows not to show a 1 in the circle when there is only 1 feature.  Is this just OOTB functionality not to show a number when there is only 1 feature? It appears to me that the individual features start to show up at largest scale (most zoomed in) if you zoom into an area where at the largest scale there is still a cluster of features (symbol shows at least 2). ... View more