Latest Contributions by AZendel

I just started having similar issues today (6/4/2024). I've been intermittently developing a custom app using version 4.29 for a couple of months now. Users can click/tap a bus stop that is going to be discontinued. This click opens a popup that tells them where the closest alternative stop is - and it features a button that says "show me where". When they click the button, I used map animations to zoom to the alternative stop. Once the animation ends, a pop up opens on the alternative stop that displays more information.  Because most bus users will not be using a laptop nor desktop, I've been testing this functionality in Chrome and Firefox on my Android (Galaxy S20 Ultra) pretty regularly. I haven't had many problems at all. Then this morning I added a few more feature layers to the map and changed the base map png (not vector) tiles that are served from our county's ArcGIS Server. I tested things a number of times on Chrome on my desktop and didn't notice any issues. But when I tested it on Chrome on my phone, I saw some flickering when the first pop up is displayed. It was weird and a little annoying, but the app is still usable. But now when I click the 'show me where' button, the map zooms to the alternative stop, the pop-up displays and the map goes completely blank. I also can't interact with the map at all until I close the popup which is 'docked' on the bottom part of the map. Since the original poster mentioned that he was using Edge on Android, I installed Edge on my phone for the first time just now. The flickering is more pronounced on Edge than it is on Chrome. And the map goes blank when the second pop-up appears, just like Chrome. When I change (downgrade) from the JS API from version 4.29 to 4.28, (note the 8): -- Chrome (Android): the flickering seemed to be present the first few times I loaded the map, but it appears to be gone now. The map does NOT go blank when the second pop-up appears. My app is usable again! -- Edge (Android): the flickering is more frequent than Chrome. The map does NOT go blank when the second pop up appears. It's a little annoying but my app is usable.  Additional notes: I did not experience any issues on my Windows 11 Desktop using Chrome, Edge and Firefox. When testing on these browsers, I opened the Dev panels and simulated the app on phone sized screens. I also didn't have any problems with Firefox on my phone.  Browser versions/builds on my phone (none are development or beta versions, as far as I can tell): Edge: 125.0.2535.72 Chrome: 125.0.6422.146. According to this site, version 125.0.6422.140 was released on 5/30/2024. I don't think that I tested my app between then and today (6/6/2024), so it seems plausible that this Chrome release may have caused the issue. Firefox: 122.0 (Build #2015998391) At least my web app is working. I doubt many people are using Edge on Android, so my level of concern is not super high. I hope this information helps.  ... View more

This strikes me as pretty crazy as well. I think the functionality should allow you to create the feature, then set the attributes (including the required domain(s)), then save edits. If the attributes don't meet the validation rules, then Pro should refuse saving the edit until the needed value is supplied. You can't change the attributes before the feature is created! If you have multiple domains on multiple fields, then your editing template would have to be very long to accommodate every possible option. Maybe I'm missing something or misunderstanding the problem, but pigeonholing us into this situation doesn't make sense. In my case, the feature class is stored in SDE (Enterprise Geodatabase) and has map services pointed at it. So I can't change the schema to allow nulls or set a default value without disabling the map service. The link to the help file that  @CarsonG suggested did allow me to disable the validation. I wish that this setting was available at the project level (allow this on some Pro projects, not the others) or at the feature class level within a project. This validation could be helpful on feature classes with only one domain.  ... View more

Thanks for all of the follow ups! ... View more

Thanks for the reply, Scott.  My steps are 1) click the Edges "tab" on the reshape edge tool 2) activate the "select one or more edges" tool 3) select the edge 4) click the "Reshape" button  5) start my cut/sketch. If I zoom in or out, I lose the sketch about 85% of the time. Sometimes it doesn't happen. My co-worker is experiencing the same while we are simultaneously editing the same versioned feature class that hosted on Oracle enterprise geodatabase. Did you run your tests against an Enterprise GDB? Specifically Oracle? ... View more

It looks like this has been implemented in Pro 3.x when using the cut tool. Thank you, ESRI. But it seems like this has NOT been implemented when using the reshape tool. Please add that, ESRI! ... View more

Yes please. Maybe allow the user to specify the transparency as well.  ... View more

Yes, please! It sounds like this hasn't been implemented yet? Somebody tell me that I'm wrong. Has anyone built a custom widget that they can share? ... View more

I'm seeing this on an Oracle EGDB as well. I'm still using Pro 3.0.3, but 3.1.0 is available. But based on the bug report, I don't think this this has been fixed. @Robert_LeClair, it may not hurt to let the staff that are addressing the bug know that I've run into the issue on an Oracle SDE instance as well. It's happening on the SHAPE.Area field and a separate double precision field that has nothing to do with the geometry.  I'm glad that the statistics that it was reporting were so out of the park that something was blatantly wrong. Otherwise, I could have reported some bad numbers and that should never be considered acceptable. I think this bug warrants faster action than it appears to have received so far.  ... View more

Thanks for the excellent explanation, Shannon. And for confirming that the SQL Server documentation that I quoted applies to Oracle and the other Enterprise GDBs (though I imagine each DBMS may have some of its own particular details/idiosyncrasies regarding area and length calculations). I can stop scratching my head now......  Thanks again.   While we're on the topic of SHAPE.AREA, it be really nice to be able to specify the units that are displayed in these fields. As you saw above, I almost exclusively use TN State Plan HARN NAD83. The X/Y units are in feet so the SHAPE.AREA fields display square feet. Square feet is a easy to digest when you're at the building or lot level, but once you get up into dozens of acres, it's almost meaningless, like 4,535,588.22548 sq ft. I'd much rather see acres in feature classes with larger polygons. You mentioned attribute rules, but it sounds like you'd need to create a new field to store the calculate area? That could get inefficient on larger datasets. I also realize that Query Layers allow you to specify SQL that can handle this conversion, but then you can't edit the FC. It'd also be nice to have dynamic field that makes calculations beyond geometry (summing several columns of different races reported in census data). QGIS has 'virtual fields' that do just that.  ... View more

After coming across this post, I think the discrepancy comes down to how Oracle and ArcGIS are handling curves when calculating area. That post is for SQL Server, but I imagine that something similar is happening with Oracle.  ... View more

Thanks for the quick response. I believe I ran across that page in the documentation, but it's hard to remember all that I read before I decided to post here. That page starts with "The Esri ST_Geometry spatial data type.....", which implies that ESRI created it. That makes me think that ST_Geometry is used in File GDB's, but I could not confirm that after extensive web searches . Good suggestion on looking for curves in the source geometry. There are some (below). But shouldn't those transfer from Oracle to FGDB the same?     ... View more

Yes, please! I would love to be able to specify 'overwrite outputs' at the individual model level. Can this be added to a model's 'environment' settings? I also execute a number of geoprocessing models via ArcPy stand alone scripts. So the setting in the Pro interface as shown here is not effective in these situations because the scripts are executed 100% outside of the Pro environment.  ... View more