Latest Contributions by AZendel

It looks like ESRI has revoked the ability for us to use an avatar of our choosing since we can't upload an image any longer (unless  I missed something).  ... View more

Yes, please. I would also like this when reviewing a point layer by scrolling through the attribute table. Clicking the area circled in red zooms  to the point feature. I'd like the ability to set the scale while doing this.    ... View more

Yes, please! ESRI, this would be nice addition.  ... View more

I think I'm still having this issue because our county's ArcGIS Server is still at 10.81 and my Pro version is still 3.03 due to a different compatibility issue with the server.  For anyone who still runs into this, try this ArcPy script to remove "USER_" from each field name. You can add it to a toolbox and use it like any other geoprocessing tool.  # Import arcpy module import arcpy # Script arguments inLayer = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0) if inLayer == '#' or not inLayer: inLayer = "C:\\TEMP\\ArcGISUpload.gdb\\Test" # provide a default value if unspecified fld_list = arcpy.ListFields(inLayer,"") for fld in fld_list: thisField = fld.name if "USER_" in thisField: newFieldName = thisField[5:] arcpy.AddMessage("Removing USER_ from " + newFieldName) try: # Process: Alter Field arcpy.AlterField_management(inLayer, thisField, newFieldName, newFieldName) except arcpy.ExecuteError: arcpy.AddWarning("An error occurred when trying to remove USER_ from " + newFieldName + ". It probably exists elsewhere in the table. SKIPPING")   ... View more

That appears to have fixed it! It's listing the contents of a FGDB feature class.  I'm on Pro 3.03 because our county's outdated version of ArcGIS server apparently doesn't play nice with anything > 3.0.x. Now to test this with our Enterprise GDB. Thanks for your help! ... View more

Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, I ran the solution without modifying anything. Then I navigated to a *file* geodatabase, clicked the Open button and got the MsgBox that read: "No tables or feature datasets read". I tried that with a FGDB on my C drive and on a network drive with the UNC path and the mapped drive "letter". The exception that triggered the above occurred on the line that read: using (Geodatabase gdb = new Geodatabase( new FileGeodatabaseConnectionPath(new Uri(_gdbPath, UriKind.Absolute)))) { The exception had this description: "External component has thrown an exception." Unfortunately, that doesn't help me troubleshoot much at all. Something more descriptive like "error checking out a license" would have been much more helpful!  And that was a very similar message that I got in my previous post on a very similar line that attempted to 'connect'/open the geodatabase.  Thoughts? ... View more

Thanks for the suggestion. I just tried arcpy.env.overwriteOutput = True and it does work.  ... View more

I ran into the exact same issues. Access won't support joins on "long text"/"memo" fields. I used to update attributes of feature classes (i.e., a shape field was present) very frequently. That is hard (maybe impossible?) to do in Access/ODBC because the libraries to handle geometries are not installed. It's probably moot to be spending more time on typing this. I think it's pretty clear that this ship has sailed......   I've been using "Personal ArcSDE" on SQL express for SQL access to my data. It helps alleviate a lot of this pain, but it's not perfect. And AFAIK, you still cant create a new geodatabase in this environment in Pro. You must use ArcCatalog. It's free (at least for now while it's available), but you're limited to 5 read connections and 1 edit connection. That makes it hard to run geoprocessing models and examine the output at the same time.  ... View more

I'm also experiencing this on 3.0.3 as well. I'm using query layers to display polygons as points SELECT FILENUM, (sde.st_centroid (SHAPE)) AS SHAPE FROM MY_FEATURE_CLASS Pro version 3.3.1 is available, but we can't upgrade due to a compatibility issue with our enterprise geodatabase. I hope this is fixed in 3.3.1. The bug documentation doesn't mention a resolution.  ... View more

I just started having similar issues today (6/4/2024). I've been intermittently developing a custom app using version 4.29 for a couple of months now. Users can click/tap a bus stop that is going to be discontinued. This click opens a popup that tells them where the closest alternative stop is - and it features a button that says "show me where". When they click the button, I used map animations to zoom to the alternative stop. Once the animation ends, a pop up opens on the alternative stop that displays more information.  Because most bus users will not be using a laptop nor desktop, I've been testing this functionality in Chrome and Firefox on my Android (Galaxy S20 Ultra) pretty regularly. I haven't had many problems at all. Then this morning I added a few more feature layers to the map and changed the base map png (not vector) tiles that are served from our county's ArcGIS Server. I tested things a number of times on Chrome on my desktop and didn't notice any issues. But when I tested it on Chrome on my phone, I saw some flickering when the first pop up is displayed. It was weird and a little annoying, but the app is still usable. But now when I click the 'show me where' button, the map zooms to the alternative stop, the pop-up displays and the map goes completely blank. I also can't interact with the map at all until I close the popup which is 'docked' on the bottom part of the map. Since the original poster mentioned that he was using Edge on Android, I installed Edge on my phone for the first time just now. The flickering is more pronounced on Edge than it is on Chrome. And the map goes blank when the second pop-up appears, just like Chrome. When I change (downgrade) from the JS API from version 4.29 to 4.28, (note the 8): -- Chrome (Android): the flickering seemed to be present the first few times I loaded the map, but it appears to be gone now. The map does NOT go blank when the second pop-up appears. My app is usable again! -- Edge (Android): the flickering is more frequent than Chrome. The map does NOT go blank when the second pop up appears. It's a little annoying but my app is usable.  Additional notes: I did not experience any issues on my Windows 11 Desktop using Chrome, Edge and Firefox. When testing on these browsers, I opened the Dev panels and simulated the app on phone sized screens. I also didn't have any problems with Firefox on my phone.  Browser versions/builds on my phone (none are development or beta versions, as far as I can tell): Edge: 125.0.2535.72 Chrome: 125.0.6422.146. According to this site, version 125.0.6422.140 was released on 5/30/2024. I don't think that I tested my app between then and today (6/6/2024), so it seems plausible that this Chrome release may have caused the issue. Firefox: 122.0 (Build #2015998391) At least my web app is working. I doubt many people are using Edge on Android, so my level of concern is not super high. I hope this information helps.  ... View more

This strikes me as pretty crazy as well. I think the functionality should allow you to create the feature, then set the attributes (including the required domain(s)), then save edits. If the attributes don't meet the validation rules, then Pro should refuse saving the edit until the needed value is supplied. You can't change the attributes before the feature is created! If you have multiple domains on multiple fields, then your editing template would have to be very long to accommodate every possible option. Maybe I'm missing something or misunderstanding the problem, but pigeonholing us into this situation doesn't make sense. In my case, the feature class is stored in SDE (Enterprise Geodatabase) and has map services pointed at it. So I can't change the schema to allow nulls or set a default value without disabling the map service. The link to the help file that  @CarsonG suggested did allow me to disable the validation. I wish that this setting was available at the project level (allow this on some Pro projects, not the others) or at the feature class level within a project. This validation could be helpful on feature classes with only one domain.  ... View more

Thanks for all of the follow ups! ... View more