POST
|
OK, I can work with that. I just need to add the item size to a list and sum the list. Using something like this... item = gis.content.search(item_name)[0]
item_id = gis.content.get(item.id)
item_size = item_id.size/1024/1024 and total = 0 for item in content: total += item_size return total I'll see if I can get it working and post back.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
1
|
0
|
161
|
POST
|
Very slick. I'll keep that in mind if I ever get to the point I can justify the budget. Anyone else have a more cost-effective solution specifically for Group content? I basically had to make a list of all the feature services in a group and cross reference them in the stock Storage report from AGOL.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
2
|
202
|
POST
|
I'm wondering if other AGOL administrators have found a way to generate a report of storage (and the resultant credits usage) by Group within your org. I would like to find a way to estimate how much storage a particular group needs, and hopefully estimate how many credits they would require to host their content in their own AGOL org. I have tried the standard reports available, as well as those available from GEO Jobe, but have not found a way to break the storage out by Group.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
5
|
242
|
IDEA
|
I understand that Anzu Raptors are essentially DJI licensed designs, produced by a US-based company outside of China that use more secure software (Aloft). They state on their website that they have an SDK available. This could be a good option for ESRI users with a limited budget that are trying to avoid the potential pitfalls of DJI drones.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
2
|
1
|
140
|
BLOG
|
Any plans to support the Anzu Raptor? I understand that those are essentially DJI licensed designs, produced by a US-based company outside of China that use more secure software (Aloft). They state on their website that they have an SDK available. Maybe a good option for ESRI users with a limited budget that are trying to avoid the potential pitfalls of DJI?
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
453
|
POST
|
Update - I've fixed my issue and verified that there is NOT a 255 character limit for the instance_name cell.
... View more
05-22-2024
10:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
202
|
POST
|
Hi Nick, I'm racking my brain from 3 years ago, but I don't think I found a solution using ArcGIS Online. I can't remember if I gave up, and/or tried an entirely different approach, possibly using a combination of Excel and ArcGIS Pro. Let us all know if you figure something out!
... View more
05-22-2024
10:44 AM
|
0
|
0
|
94
|
POST
|
Did you figure out how to get your whole statement working? I am having a similar issue where only part of the statement executes in the Inbox. I see that there is a 3-line limit to the instance_name cell in XLS forms. My expression is on a single line. Do we know if there is also a character limit that will be read and executed in XLS? Such as 255?
... View more
05-22-2024
09:57 AM
|
0
|
1
|
209
|
POST
|
I'm using Connect 3.19.116 and was seeing this issue without uppercase file extension letters (.png). It looks like removing spaces from my thumbnail file name has fixed the problem.
... View more
05-03-2024
09:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
93
|
POST
|
Update: I found that I could export the point features I want to append to the Survey123 feature class as a file geodatabase, zip the file, go to the item details page for the feature class, go to the Data tab, and select “Update Data”. This let me map the field names and add the features via a web browser. I tried a number of things in Pro to make the Append work, including disabling Z and M values on the input dataset, but they all failed with the same message. I suspect it is because the destination dataset says it has a filter applied, but the only filter applied is a time filter, which I did not setup and cannot be changed (the controls are grayed out in Pro). When I go to the feature service definition, time is disabled. This may be a bug in Pro, as I was able to append in ArcGIS Online directly.
... View more
04-08-2024
06:24 PM
|
0
|
0
|
283
|
POST
|
I have a point layer I want to be the basis of my Inbox for my inspectors. I used this layer, published as a feature service, to create a new Survey123 form. I added a lot of customization, including repeats to allow additional geotrace and geoshape questions that will be related to the original point layer. I could not publish the updated form from Survey123 Connect using the submission_url and form_id, because Survey123 cannot find the related layers that store the repeats. I removed the submission_url and published a new empty set of feature classes for the form instead. I then brought the newly published feature service into ArcGIS Pro and attempted to use Append to add the existing points/attribute to the form's main feature class. But I get warning "000594: Input Feature #: Function not implemented" on every point when running the Append tool. I have verified that the Output XY Domain is "Union of Inputs" and that both feature classes are in WGS1984. Am I going about this correctly? Please show me how to get my existing points into the Survey123 form feature class so I can use them in the Inbox.
... View more
04-08-2024
04:06 PM
|
0
|
1
|
315
|
BLOG
|
I'm also getting this behavior, seemingly at random, while testing in Survey123 Connect (I have not published yet). It was working, now it is reverting back to the default naming convention on some image questions but not others. My survey is based on a pre-existing feature service, and I am using the OBJECTID field (bind::esri:fieldType = null) as a prefix to the question name and timestamp. Survey123 Connect Version 3.19.115
... View more
04-08-2024
10:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1460
|
POST
|
LOL! I was not making this logical leap! You can paste the image right into the doc in the conditional statement the same way you enter a text string. No calling of external media required. And you can get the format/size perfect without having to guess at pixel width. That is better than publishing the image as an item in ArcGIS. Thanks for pointing this out! I'll mark this as the solution with the clarification that the answer is "No, you can't access the Media folder from the form, but you CAN do this."
... View more
02-20-2024
11:24 AM
|
1
|
0
|
478
|
POST
|
I have looked at that section. My current, less than optimal, solution is to call the $image | src: expression within my IF statement. This works for now with a small number of users, but is not very scalable. I have to load the images to BOTH the Media Folder in Survey123 connect and update the survey choices with the media::image name, AND I have to publish the images as items in our ArcGIS Online organization, then update the Report code to use the generated item URL. It would be preferable if I could just call the media::image file in the report, since it has already been published to ArcGIS Online along with the form. I just don't know where the Media folder files get hosted when you publish a Survey123 form. Should I make this an enhancement request? Are we sure there is no way to access the Media folder files in ArcGIS Online?
... View more
02-20-2024
09:34 AM
|
0
|
1
|
488
|
POST
|
I'm trying to place images stored in the Media folder on my Report template. The image would be displayed if the inspector chose that displayed image from a select_one choice question. (I am using the media::image field in my choice list to specify the image file). All of the examples I am finding are for placing the attached image from an image question in the report. Does the Survey123 Report have access to the Media folder for a form? I'm thinking the syntax in the word document template for my report should be something like: ${if Inspector | selected: "Hancock"} ${ Inspector | get{media::image} | size:400:0} ${/} Or maybe I can call the media file name directly from the folder? I tried this: ${if Inspector | selected: "Hancock"} ${JohnHancock.png | size:400:0} ${/} But I get: Failed to parse ${JohnHancock.png | size:400:0} since png cannot be found in the current parsing scope. FYI: I am sideloading higher resolution image files of my inspector's signatures to the form for use in the report, as they find the appearance of the Signature question to be too sloppy when it appears on our final reports.
... View more
02-15-2024
03:48 PM
|
0
|
4
|
618
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
2 | 2 weeks ago | |
1 | 2 weeks ago | |
1 | 02-20-2024 11:24 AM | |
1 | 10-05-2022 04:56 PM | |
1 | 10-06-2022 09:44 AM |