Latest Contributions by DrewFlater

Edit sessions in arcpy are monitored at the workspace level using functions like arcpy.IsBeingEdited(workspace)  Script tools are aware of any edits performed via an edit session in the app - both edited attributes and modified features should be in sync from the app to your script tool's execution code. The script execution should be aware of those new attributes and features. This simple execution test code shows that after starting editing, creating a new feature, the messages from execute indicate the workspace is being edited and the new features are available in the cursor.  Execution sample: import arcpy in_features = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0) workspace = arcpy.Describe(in_features).path # Return True/False message about the edit session arcpy.AddMessage(f"Workspace containing input features ~{in_features}~ is in an Edit Session: {arcpy.IsBeingEdited(workspace)}") count = 0 with arcpy.da.SearchCursor(in_features, ["OID@"]) as scur: for row in scur: count+=1 # Return count message to show new features from the edit session are available to the cursor arcpy.AddMessage(f"Count of records in input features using cursor: {count}")   Here are the output messages before doing the edits: Workspace containing input features ~Devices~ is in an Edit Session: False Count of records in input features using cursor: 3 And the messages after creating features using interactive editing tools (edits are still pending, not saved or discarded) Workspace containing input features ~Devices~ is in an Edit Session: True Count of records in input features using cursor: 4 ... View more

This defect was resolved in ArcGIS Pro 3.6: https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug/in-arcgis-pro-31-file-geodatabase-connections-on-networ-bug-000160252  If there are additional cases related to this, please let us know ... View more

It is unlikely that Arcade expressions will be broadly supported as an alternative to individual fields in all or many geoprocessing tools, due to the per-tool implementation/development cost that would need to be done per tool. There are other enhancement ideas for some specific tools, for example Append using an expression language for field mapping, which are being tracked as development issues: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/enhance-append-tool-to-allow-python-arcade/idi-p/1195885 For more broad support, we would need the entire ArcGIS system to support data reading via cursors that can do the Arcade evaluation natively, rather than at the per-tool implementation level. I'd like to refer you to this existing enhancement Idea for virtual fields that are configured and stored at the layer level and could be broadly used across ArcGIS: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/virtual-attributes-ad-hoc/idi-p/1276471 ... View more

@AmberConverse The Community needs an idea champion to log the new idea to control the behavior from an option. Then let the voting commence!  ... View more

@ZachEdwards_WDSGIS , if other software packages are able to extract the coordinates, but arcpy.GetImageEXIFProperties() fails, that is definitely a defect and I would like the opportunity to try to review and fix this case. Would appreciate an email with example image if possible. ... View more

Hi @ZachEdwards_WDSGIS can you see the comment above with troubleshooting using the arcpy.GetImageEXIFProperties() function? If this function does not work with your image, there may be a problem with the image or with the function. Esri Support would be able to help troubleshoot this. Or you can email me a sample image that causes an error for Esri development to investigate. [email protected] ... View more

It is not likely to be delivered as an excel spreadsheet like available in this Esri Community thread, but the ArcGIS Pro team is planning a documentation page or formal resource for seeing a licensing break down for all geoprocessing tools.  ... View more

Hi @HeatherAlexander  The Contour tool in ArcGIS Pro provides a Contour Type parameter to create polygons (filled contour lines) directly. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/contour.htm  Can you explain how this may not match your request?  About Feature To Polygon, it is true that this tool does not maintain attribute information without post processing, and we are working on an enhancement to resolve that, ENH-000132387.  ... View more

@Jeff-Reinhart only a subset of options are available in the Pro admin settings system, not including the option referenced above. Yes a new ArcGIS Pro Idea would be suitable in this case, and we should be able to prioritize it in the near term with your justification of how your organization will benefit from applying (and potentially locking) that option at the admin level (across many analyst machines for the org). Some of the options are quite logical why an admin would want to set it, but opening the messages seems like something more suitable to the individual user's preference. But I look forward to discussing that further in the new Idea 🙂 ... View more

@HaydeeHY This enhancement Idea is in the development team's Near Term backlog. A new tool for KML conversion, KML To Geodatabase, will be released in ArcGIS Pro 3.6 for enhanced attribute handling. Any enhancements like this one that were logged for KML To Layer will only be developed for the new tool going forward.  ... View more