Latest Contributions by DrewFlater

Geoprocessing environments provide an output coordinate system that many geoprocessing tools will honor and use as default.  You can also specify tool parameter overrides if there is a specific coordinate system you want to be the default every time you open Project or other tools. https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/analytics/tool-parameter-overrides-in-arcgis-pro-3-3 ... View more

Notification sounds are available in ArcGIS Pro 3.5. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/user-interface-options.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_6FAA3128F0664D92817715A462FF30AE ... View more

@wayfaringrob an easter egg for an Honored Contributor: you can hold down right-shift keyboard key when clicking to open a tool, and it will open the floating tool dialog box. Running the tool in this mode also uses the foreground thread execution with blocking progress dialog, similar to ArcMap.  @SH_DH we received more feedback than the 2 kudos above that it was desired for the back button to return to the previous active pane used to open the tool. But based on your feedback we may need an option for the user to choose which behavior they prefer. Since this is the implemented idea related to navigating back to the previous non-Geoprocessing pane, it would be good for you to make a new ArcGIS Pro Idea about this option to change the behavior.  Also consider this: the Geoprocessing pane has a Recent section at the bottom with access to previously run tools, and the little menu will help you see the messages and reopen tools with parameter populated that were used previously. Internally I call this the Geoprocessing pane mini-history.    Also, rather than switching to the Catalog pane to access project toolboxes/tools, the same toolboxes are available in the Toolboxes tab of the Geoprocessing pane.    The Geoprocessing pane Recent (mini-history) and project Toolboxes were both added to keep you from needing to pane-switch as much, which would both help in the case you use the Back button since it would stay in the Geoprocessing pane.     ... View more

Closing the issue as it will not be implemented as described in the title.  A different idea could be logged with the Geodatabase label for Pro's text file workspace to support a specific column header row.  ... View more

There is no mechanism to disallow 1:m joined data. This enhancement idea is being considered to dynamically assign unique ObjectIDs when performing a 1:m join, so the result can be used as input to more/most geoprocessing tools.  https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/add-join-pseudo-objectid-row-number-as-unique-id/idi-p/1494563 ... View more

Oh and one more follow up - if you re-add the output dataset from Catalog/Add Data back to the map, you get the default/normal single symbol right? ... View more

@RTPL_AU are you running a custom or system tool that produces the messed up symbology? This looks like a BUG that we would want to resolve. When a tool operation is something like a copy (might not be an exact copy, but some modification like a Clip, but the geometry type and fields from the input are the same), the geoprocessing framework determines if the input used is a layer, and in an effort to make the new output look similar to the input layer, the input layer properties including symbology, charts, popup definitions, and more, are applied to the new output. In general this was what a lot of users were expecting and made them more productive because they didn't have to re-set the layer properties with a post process themselves. But it's clear from your example case that it is not working as expected, which should be logged as a software defect.  We can leave the Idea open as it's still a valid idea, though for your case we obviously don't want it to be messing up the grouped labels, etc.  ... View more

Use the Join one To first join operation of Add Join for a case insensitive join. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/add-join.htm#:~:text=One%2Dto%2Dfirst%20joins%20are%20not%20case%20sensitive%3B%20one%2Dto%2Dmany%20joins%20are%20case%20sensitive. ... View more

Refactoring the Calculate Field tool into a toolbar in the attribute table view is being researched for a near term release. Attribute Rules provide a lot of the functionality described above for storing a calculation expression with a field and automatically performing the calculation on data changes. Learn more about calculation attribute rules here: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/calculation-attribute-rules.htm  ... View more

@jbcypreste Spatial Join is about summarizing/transfering attributes from a join layer to a target layer based on spatial relationship of those two layers. Select By Location is about selecting features in an input layer that have a certain spatial relationship with features in the selecting layer. Spatial Join handles 1:m relationships where one target shares a spatial relationship with many join features, and you can either summarize the m attributes into one value, or get the value from the join feature that is the closest or has the most overlap. So in your parks and districts example, which layer is the input (the one that gets selection applied) and which is the selecting layer? For a spatial join it's likely you want something like the district ID that overlaps the most with the park to be transferred to each park. What is the scenario for Select By Location? The parks layer likely has dozens of parks features even for a small town and maybe a few districts, and maybe some of the parks overlap multiple districts. If the parks are the input and the districts are the selecting features, all parks are going to get selected because they all overlap districts. If you only have one park and you want to select which district overlaps it the most, that could be useful and you would set the districts as the input and the 1 selected park as the selecting features. But when there are multiple parks it is likely every district is going to get selected since each of them will likely be the district that overlaps with at least one park. Select By Location only adds a selection it doesn't in this example add the information about which district has the largest overlap with each park.  I am not sure what the expectation is here, which is why this idea is still in Needs Clarification status. ... View more

We are treating the Security warning on Refresh as a defect at this time, to be addressed in the near term.  If you only use Python Toolboxes from yourself/your organization which are all trusted, you could consider setting BlockNonSystemPythonToolbox to No. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/geoprocessing-settings.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_88A083A5D68B430D96BD4D81DBCD2D47  ... View more