|
POST
|
Currently, we're at ArcGIS Pro 3.7.1. Bug fix status is currently: In Product Plan @KoryKramer, it's been In Product Plan for quite a while on this one. Any idea when it's actually going to make it into the product? Thanks.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
22
|
|
POST
|
This post is the result of an ESRI Tech Support case that I've had open for over a month, at this point. ESRI seems to be struggling with this issue. I decided to make this post because there's so much misinformation and advice out there which doesn't work or even makes the problem worse.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
1
|
0
|
181
|
|
POST
|
Here’s background information and how to delete a Ghost Locator, a file based locator in ArcGIS Pro which keeps coming back after the user has deleted it. Here's what I've discovered about the locator problem. This problem has been demonstrated on: ArcGIS Pro 3.6.3, 3.6.4, and 3.7.1 Multiple PC's Multiple User Profiles Facts about the Ghost Locator Problem Some of this may seem wordy and repetitive. I’m just trying to get all of the concepts and issues out there. I may edit this over time. Over time, ArcGIS Pro creates multiple hidden references to a file-based locator within an APRX file. However, those multiple hidden references are displayed as a single locator in the ArcGIS Pro Catalog, and the user does not know this. If the file-based locator is moved or removed at the file system level of if the ArcGIS Pro project is moved, such that ArcGIS Pro can no longer find it, then the disconnected locator in ArcGIS Pro will be displayed with a red exclamation point in the Catalog and becomes a Ghost Locator. If a disconnected Ghost locator is deleted (Remove From Project) from the Catalog, it will remove only one of the locator's hidden references from the APRX. The other references will remain in the APRX. If a reference to the Ghost Locator is deleted from the APRX, ArcGIS Pro must then be closed and restarted in order to refresh the entry for the Ghost Locator in the Catalog and make it appear again in order to delete the next hidden reference. I have been unable to find a way to simply refresh the Catalog and make the next instance of the Ghost Locator appear without closing and reopening ArcGIS Pro. In order to completely delete a disconnected locator, it is necessary to delete it multiple times in order to delete all of the hidden references to that locator. After each delete you must close and reopen the APRX to view and delete the next instance of the Ghost Locator. It is not necessary to perform a Clear Cache to remove a Ghost Locator. If a Clear Cache is performed this will create an additional copy of the ghost locator. If a Save is performed after the Clear Cache then the additional locator will be saved in the APRX file, increasing the number of hidden references to the Ghost Locator. However, if a Save is not performed then the additional locator will not be saved. Also, if a Clear Cache is performed, then a warning popup will appear which says, "Invalid Locator: Locator is not supported." The message may pop up more than once. The number of times that the message appears is the number of hidden references to the Ghost Locator which are in the APRX. This number is how many times you will need to perform the delete in order to remove the Ghost Locator from the project. Despite claims to the contrary in many sources, Clear Cache is not necessary to delete a Ghost Locator. It’s only useful to determine how many references to the Ghost Locator are within an APRX. Attempting to remove the Ghost Locator by recreating a locator along the same file system path as the Ghost Locator and then deleting that did not remove the Ghost Locator. Attempting to remove the Ghost Locator by using the recommended Delete geoprocessing tool also did remove the Ghost Locator. How to remove a Ghost Locator from an APRX: Open the APRX file that has a Ghost Locator. Perform a Clear Cache and count the number of times the popup appears which says, “Invalid Locator: Locator is not supported." Do NOT save the project after performing the Clear Cache. Select: Project > Options > Display > Clear Cache Now > OK > OK Select OK each time the warning message appears and count how many times you do it. Close the ArcGIS Pro without saving. If it prompts you to save, select No. Repeat the following steps for the number of times that you saw the popup. Open the APRX file. Delete the Ghost Locator. Right-click the Ghost Locator in the Catalog and select Remove From Project in the popup menu. Save the APRX. Close the APRX. After you complete step 4 for each hidden reference, the Ghost Locator should be gone from your APRX. Summary: I have found that removing a Ghost Locator only requires performing the delete (Remove From Project) for the number of times that the reference to the Ghost Locator is found in the APRX file. It is not necessary to perform the Clear Cache, at all. In fact, the Clear Cache actually creates a new reference to the Ghost Locator. However, this will only be saved to the APRX file if the project is saved before it is closed. Still, the Clear Cache is useful because performing it will reveal how many hidden references to the Ghost Locator are in the APRX. This is indicated by the number of times that the warning message is displayed during the Clear Cache operation. Problems: There are two problems for ESRI to resolve to fix this and keep it from happening. Multiple hidden references to a file-based locator are created in the APRX and are not being managed well by the ArcGIS Pro software. The Clear Cache tool creates a new, additional hidden copy of a Ghost Locator, if one exists, which may be saved and added to the APRX and complicate the problem.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
1
|
2
|
192
|
|
POST
|
This seems to be resolved now. I just shared an ArcGIS Pro map in Teams and the map appears completely normal and not blacked out on the other attendee device. Please post here if you are still experiencing the problem.
... View more
04-15-2025
06:22 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1971
|
|
IDEA
|
@KoryKramer I've been using ArcGIS Pro since 2016 and I use floating maps all the time. That's not what we're talking about here. Please review my comments above about the current functionality could be improved to be equivalent of the ArcMap Overview Map.
... View more
07-26-2024
01:29 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4265
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi @KoryKramer. The linked cursor is a nice feature, but it is not an extent rectangle and does not show the extent of the zoom level of the main map. Also, the "Overview Map" should not recenter every time you pan the map that it's linked to. It should have a fixed extent or it should allow the option of either centering or not centering. If ESRI is determined not to provide the same basic ease-of-use and functionality, a one-button solution like ArcMap has, then perhaps it could expand the features of the linked map to do the same thing. So specifically, to make the linked map work like an ArcMap Overview Map it should: Provide an extent rectangle in the linked map showing the zoom level of the main map. Enable the linked map to either not pan or to pan, that is, to allow a fixed extent. Your thoughts?
... View more
07-22-2024
01:32 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4316
|
|
IDEA
|
We've got a user with a license checked out. She doesn't even know how it happened. She got a new computer that was reimaged with the license still checked out. Now it won't let her check out Pro from ArcGIS online. You mean there's no way for an admin to return a license?
... View more
07-05-2024
02:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1934
|
|
IDEA
|
Here's the ESRI Community Question with more conversation and details on this. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/is-there-a-floating-overview-map-in-arcgis-pro/td-p/398056
... View more
06-17-2024
06:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4540
|
|
IDEA
|
@EdiePunt @KoryKramer Any chance of implementing this ArcMap Equivalence issue? It's got lots of kudos.
... View more
06-17-2024
06:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4544
|
|
IDEA
|
This is an important ArcMap Equivalence issue. This is not just some new feature that users want. Why was this not implemented years ago? This issue should have been placed In Product Plan in 2019 when it was first brought to ESRI's attention.
... View more
06-11-2024
05:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1811
|
|
IDEA
|
@KoryKramer Yes, I get same result on the second try within a session as I did the first time. I refined my testing and tested in a simple ArcGIS Pro project. My initial test result of ~90 seconds was with a very heavy project with lots of layers. When I tested in a simple project, the time to generate the print job was about 30 seconds. That's much better than 90 seconds, but still 15 times longer than ArcMap's 2 seconds.
... View more
05-28-2024
08:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1039
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks @KoryKramer. It's good to have this feature. I just tested this item. It took about 1 1/2 minutes to generate a print job where I had selected 6 records out of a table of about 58,000 records. 1 1/2 minutes to print 6 records in text format seems kind of sluggish. Is there room for improvement there?
... View more
05-10-2024
08:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1090
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks @KoryKramer. I just tested this item. It took 1 1/2 minutes to generate a print job where I had selected 6 records out of a table of about 58,000 records. 1 1/2 minutes to print 6 records in text format seems kind of sluggish. In ArcMap, printing a similar selection of 6 records from the same table only takes about 2 seconds to generate the print job. Is there room for improvement there?
... View more
05-10-2024
08:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3686
|
|
POST
|
I think this is at the discretion of the author of this question. After you post a question and comments are provided, the author is is automatically asked if any of the comments provide the answer. If the author indicates that a particular comment is the answer, then it will be displayed as the answer. As the author of other questions here, I have been prompted in just this manner to indicate whether one of the responses is the answer. So, you may disagree with the author's judgement, or the author may have accidentally selected an answer by mistake, but that the state at the moment. I don't know if it's possible for an author to change their mind about their choice of a Solution. You may wish to read my response, below, as several have found it helpful. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/how-can-i-quot-store-relative-pathnames-quot-in/m-p/1031204#M37949
... View more
05-09-2024
10:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5004
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 02-15-2021 12:16 PM | |
| 1 | 03-21-2024 02:58 PM | |
| 1 | 11-07-2023 06:17 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|