Latest Contributions by JamieLambert

Dropping the Emergency Response Guide (ERG) widget is a significant loss. This has come up several times in posts and comments. A couple of examples below. Emergency Response Widget release Roadmap for Expe... - Esri Community Alternative for Emergency Response Guide Widget - Esri Community Also, the replacement of the Situation Awareness widget (WAB), Near Me widget (ExB), doesn't allow buffers created with the widget to be saved as a feature. Do these omissions indicate Esri is moving away from emergency response support? @EsriPublicSafety  ... View more

Hi @Jianxia ,I agree with too many posts here to mention. Particularly for Emergency Response - the widgets available in WAB critical (threat analysis, emergency response guide, etc.). While ExB has some great features, we are stuck with WAB. This is a surprise as Esri have a public safety team dealing with emergency response. I believe they also share the same frustrations. I would have like to see ExB - WAB parity as the focus with respect to widgets, THEN bring in the new widgets. We can't transition until the widgets we already use are available. Many, including myself, have suggested you poll the user community regarding widget development. It's not too late... ... View more

Hi @Jianxia, Happy New Year! Great list of widget coming this year. Are there any plans for the Emergency Response Guide widget? Thanks. Jamie. ... View more

Hi @Anonymous User, I got it sorted. I had pulldata("@property",'mode') in the ‘relevant’ cell of the attribute that was not working when launched via a URL. I guess this was working (or not working) out of sequence previously. From memory... I think I did this because of how the question behaved when you opened an existing survey through the Inbox when the question type is ‘autocomplete’ - on an earlier version. Once I remove the entry in the ‘relevant’ field it works as expected. And it looks fine through the Inbox now. So all good. Thanks for the quick response. Jamie. ... View more

I don't have an expression, just an attribute that is not longer being passed (to a select_one question). Had been working fine up until yesterday... On version 3.14.237 Not all our field staff are seeing this issue, some of them are still on 3.13.xx. ... View more

The master reset button for your webpage - just to the left of the address bar in Chrome and Edge! Also required in Dashboards   ... View more

and add you choice list values to 'Choices' tab in the spreadsheet! ... View more

Hi @Jianxia, 'Add Data' is a long term roadmap item. Will we see this in 2022? Or beyond? Is the user community driving this roadmap? Thanks. Jamie. ... View more

If you are using Survey123 Connect, just update the question 'type' (from 'text' to 'select_one list_name' or 'select_multiple list_name') and republish. Its still a string type field so there is no issue. You are not changing the field type or schema, just the way the question is presented in the survey form. There should be no loss of data - easy enough to make a backup of your data before making the change. I don't really use web forms, so not sure if the process is the same or not. Jamie. ... View more

I've marked "In your Field Mapper, include the sequence_id fields.  These will be needed so it knows which features to update" as the solution as I was missing this part, as well as the sample provided thats helped me validate my configuration. I think the rest of my setup was fine, though I think it was jammed up with my output definition that I was playing around with while I was trying to make it work as i wanted (missing the sequence_id in the Field Mapper obviously didn't help!). Using the example dataset provided below (Sample.gdb.zip) and creating the service as outlined, then adding complexity one step at a time (input filter, update only, etc.) I was able to validate those steps successfully. Once I was happy the setup was correct, I deleted everything from my original service (input, output, definitions, service) and rebuild from scratch, and no issues! A frustrating lesson, though a good result. Thanks for all the help @JakeSkinner! ... View more

Thanks @RJSunderman. I'll take a look at this, though I really expected this workflow to be pretty straight forward... Jamie. ... View more

If I only have sequence id and report sent in the Input and Output Definitions, and map these two fields, nothing happens. With an Input and Output Definition with all fields, though only sequence id and report sent mapped, those two fields are updated in the Output hosted feature and all other fields are overwritten to null. I don't understand why fields not mapped are being updated. Is it even possible to update one field and leave the rest untouched? Is the Field Enricher (Feature Service) processor required? Thanks. ... View more