POST
|
Lots of good stuff on this topic in this article by Noah Meyer Deployment Patterns for Exposing ArcGIS Enterprise... - Esri Community including the link to the Customer doc on the trust.arcgis.com site ArcGIS Enterprise Web Application Filter Rules
... View more
11-01-2021
07:49 PM
|
4
|
0
|
3141
|
POST
|
maybe Dan's solution could be achieved by first publishing your three "secret" layers as a map service in AGOL /Enterprise, then add this service to your Project before saving as PDF
... View more
10-31-2021
11:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1003
|
POST
|
Hi Mohammed, The questions the others are asking are likely relevant in certain circumstances, but can you first fully explain what you are trying to do? Are you attempting to register an Enterprise Geodatabase (e.g. SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL) as a data store in your Portal? or are you trying to register/validate ArcGIS Relational Data Store associated with your ArcGIS Hosting Server?
... View more
09-23-2021
06:44 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2649
|
POST
|
@DougSims_GT Did installing updated web adaptor solve your problem? If yes could you please mark this as solved?
... View more
09-07-2021
03:34 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1726
|
POST
|
Hi Joe I have personal experience where we have been able to route to https://portal.domain.com/portal/home without a web adaptor, but only within Azure using Azure Gateway, in AWS using ALB we cant do it because you need a URL rewrite functionality that AWS ALB does not provide.
... View more
08-22-2021
11:42 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1296
|
POST
|
@Jay_Gregory Did you get a resolution? Which way did your organisation choose to go?
... View more
08-15-2021
05:29 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1306
|
POST
|
The simplest solution may be to just use the "Measure" tool This will snap to existing features - and you can set the units as you desire. Another option you may be able to use is the Point Distance tool https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/analysis-toolbox/point-distance.htm Of course, these both only provide the 2D distance.
... View more
07-27-2021
07:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1679
|
POST
|
Hi William yes - the upgraded site needs its Web Adaptors to be upgraded as well. This actually means uninstall existing and install/configure new. You can get the WA installer from MyEsri You should also install the latest Patch for Web Adaptor before reconfiguring with the portal and server (this does not show up with the patchfinder tool or auto patching ) You can get it from https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Enterprise/arcgis-web-adaptor/arcgis-web-adaptor-iis/10-8-1#downloads?id=7855
... View more
07-27-2021
12:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1931
|
BLOG
|
Sorry, I did miss that you were talking only about the internal Load Balancer. Well - you could - as you say (and as the Esri diagram shows) use :7443/:6443 as incoming for the internal LB, but, as your IT group are not keen on that - you could instead use the strategy I suggested - as you have F5 that is capable of url rewrite, direct requests coming in on gisadmin.organisation.com/portal to the portal servers on :7443 and for gisadmin.organisation.com/server to the server site machines on :6443 you will need to set up the Health Checks for these as Noah's article suggests
... View more
07-26-2021
09:32 PM
|
2
|
0
|
13205
|
BLOG
|
Hi, are you locked in to the idea you want to direct traffic by using the ports? This would mean you need to allow incoming requests in F5 on :6443 and :7443, I am not surprised your Security team are unwilling - this would definitely not be a recommended practise in any site facing the public web. If it is a new site and you have not yet locked in to using those paths, then With F5, you could setup forwarding/rewrite rules that sent any requests for https://gis.company.com/portal to portalmachine1:7443/arcgis & portalmachine2:7443/arcgis and requests for https://gis.company.com/server to agsmachine1:6443/arcgis & agsmachine2:6443/arcgis The WebContextURL for the Portal and the Server would need to be set to gis.company.com. You could choose to have just the one load balancer in the DMZ and use its public address for the federation privatePortalURL and ServerAdminURL and allow users and machines to communicate via this path. or use an internal load balancer for the federation admin URLs that has the same targets, but uses admingis.company.com as incoming URL To have this work to allow administrative tasks (including re-publishing or updating an existing service) to be performed from client machines in your network, the admingis.company.com address would need to be resolvable from your client desktops as well as from the servers in your data centre. If you are however stuck with using the /arcgis paths It is possible to setup a list of addresses to look for to be routed to the :7443 portal targets (e.g. /arcgis/home, /arcgis/portaladmin, /arcgis/sharing) and :6443 server targets (everything else) I hope this has not been too convoluted
... View more
07-26-2021
08:17 PM
|
1
|
0
|
13214
|
POST
|
Hi Benjamin yes your HA configuration will work fine. Todd's suggestion is useful in specific AD configurations - check with your organisation's AD Administrator to be sure.
... View more
07-25-2021
06:11 PM
|
2
|
1
|
1651
|
POST
|
Hi Jay, are you sure it is CIFS ? That's a pretty old protocol name (see https://www.varonis.com/blog/cifs-vs-smb/ and https://blog.fosketts.net/2012/02/16/cifs-smb/) Are you actually meaning SMB? or SAMBA publishing a Linux share as SMB? SMB v1 (CIFS) is generally not recommended - but in a pinch, you can use it provided you disable OpLocks as this causes many issues with Service Publishing If using SMB2 or SMB3 - the conservative recommendation is to set Leasing Mode to "None" and Caching Here is a link to a Microsoft page providing a Powershell command to do this https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/smbshare/set-smbshare?view=win10-ps
... View more
07-22-2021
04:18 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1412
|
POST
|
Hi William, Is your Portal security set to use Web Tier Authentication ? If yes, the upgrade process may have lost that when it reinstalled the Web Adaptor. When you go via port :7443, you are bypassing the Web Adaptor. As you can login by that route, it means the Portal Site Administrator account is still working OK. When you say you can login to the Server Manager - do you go via the Web Adaptor ? https://<yoursite.domain.com>/server/manager - or direct to the ArcGIS Server? https://<yoursite.domain.com>:6443/arcgis/manager
... View more
07-22-2021
03:51 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1951
|
POST
|
Hi Evan, I dont know of a comparison page, but... There are a lot more ST_ functions provided by PostGIS than there are with the sde.st_ function set. The ones with common names serve the same purpose (syntax may be different) The Esri reference set is: ST_Geometry SQL function reference and https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/manage-data/using-sql-with-gdbs/a-quick-tour-of-sql-functions-used-with-st-geometry.htm PostGIS equivalent is: https://postgis.net/docs/reference.html hope this is somewhat useful
... View more
07-22-2021
12:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2636
|
POST
|
Hi @BenjaminBlackshear There is an excellent post on this topic here that is well worth a read. https://community.esri.com/community/implementing-arcgis/blog/2020/04/30/planning-load-balancer-configuration-for-highly-available-arcgis-enterprise In a nutshell, you need a HealthCheck for each target (VIP) endpoint configured with the Load Balancer. If there are Web Adaptors, you only need to check that the Web Adaptors are available. In your setup, with Portal & Server Web Adaptors on the same machine, I guess you have LB set to share all incoming requests to one "target group" with two Machines. In that case, you only really need a tcp availability health check for the Web Server hosting the two Web Adaptors. You do not need to use the Portal or Server healthCheck REST endpoints. (The Web Adaptors use these behind the scenes). If you use separate targets for the portal and server Web Adaptors, you could try just simple html checks for the healthCheck addresses. But... this only tells the Load Balancer that the Web Adaptor on that machine is working and that at least one of the portal/server sites is responding ok. The healthCheck endpoints are not always super fast to respond, so allow some more time and a few more retries than you may expect (as per the blog article) Hope this helps
... View more
07-21-2021
11:00 PM
|
2
|
0
|
3050
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 3 weeks ago | |
1 | 08-05-2024 11:10 PM | |
1 | 07-25-2024 07:01 PM | |
1 | 07-24-2024 06:50 PM | |
1 | 07-24-2024 10:52 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|