Latest Contributions by Andrew-Bowne

‎08-30-2024

I have an Experience Builder App that has the following widgets: Map Widget - pointing at a Web Map with a definition query for a subset of facilities Floor Filter Widget - wired up to the map widget Branch Version Management Widget - wired to a feature service configured with version management enabled. What I am encountering is that while in the Experience Builder "Live View", the floor filter widget displays as expected: AndrewBowne_0-1725031202405.png When I preview the draft app in a browser, or view the published app, the floor filter widget is grayed out: AndrewBowne_1-1725031281371.png Dev Tools tells me I need to have a Facilities and Levels layer for the floor filter to work. I Definitely have those. AndrewBowne_2-1725031960591.png Is this an issue with Branch Versioned data not being compatible with the Floor Filter widget? If I remove the Branch Version widget, it works fine.

‎08-30-2024

Is it possible to create an Indoor Viewer Configurable App with data from a branch version? We have a facility with data that currently lives in a branch version. We do not want to move it to default yet but we would like to stand up a viewer for them to use. Is this possible?

‎08-30-2024

Thanks @MarceloMarques this does answer my question. Does the same stand true for Traditional Versioning? That can also only be done on an Enterprise GDB?

‎08-29-2024

Recently we have been doing more work with Hosted Feature Layers. Is it possible to branch version a hosted feature layer? I've only been able to do it with feature layers published from an Enterprise Geodatabase.

‎08-28-2024

"In Review" when I check the bug on my.esri.com.. last updated: 2/13/2017.

‎08-20-2024

Hi @GauravJobanputra I run Update Occupants once a week. Spaces aren’t assigned anywhere else other than Space Planner so we won’t know where any of these people are located until they are assigned using Space Planner. The hope was that once their job title was updated when running Update Occupant Features, they would then show up “automatically” as unassigned employees since they are no longer meeting the filter criteria. Our workflow is not that of a typical organization as there is no formal space assignment policy or workflow. Employees sit wherever there is space, and move at their, or their supervisors, discretion. It’s definitely not the best workflow but it’s what we have to deal with.

‎08-19-2024

Thank you for the feedback, @MichaelJenkins and @GauravJobanputra It sounds to me like filtering through the web map is not something that is supported in Space Planner. @GauravJobanputra - I would be hesitant to assign all these employees to a home office. It is very possible, and does happen often, that some of these people may take another job within the organization where they could be assigned an office. So, if they were assigned to a Home Office, they would need to be unassigned then reassigned. my intent was to filter them by job title so if they changed title, they would then appear as unassigned employees. It sounds like I may need to create a filtered feature layer of people to be used in Space Planner only.

‎08-16-2024

I have a tricky one here so I will do my best to illustrate what I am experiencing: My occupants (people) feature class includes several people which will never be assigned a location. In an effort to thin out the overall number of people in space planner, I filtered out these people by job title in the web map that Space Planner Uses. In Space Planner, complete # of people: 6069 records. My People Feature Class: 6070 records. My filtered People Feature Class: 4127 records. Employees with an Assignment: 1153 records. I have no employees assigned to hot desks or hotels. Now the questions: In the Screenshot... The number of "not assigned" people (1) does not make sense. 6069-1153 = 4916 (not 4926). Also, If I am filtering the people in my web map to not include certain employees, shouldn't it be reflected withe like the filtered value of 4127-1153= 2974? Shouldn't this number (2985) be reflected as the same (incorrect) number in the left hand column (4926)? My assumption is that they are both reflecting the number of unassigned people. Also, this number seems to be closer to the filtered record count (4127) - Assigned Employees (1153) = 2974. This is 11 records off of what is being displayed (2985). This number (6069) appears to be listing ALL records (minus 1 for some reason) whether they are assigned or not. Also, it's not reflecting the filtered value (4127). Shouldn't this column be listing only what people are assigned? And, why is it not reflecting the filtered value? I'm no mathematician but these numbers don't seem to be jiving. Something also seems buggy with how the numbers are represented regarding whether they are filtered or not. Anyone care to try and decrypt this mystery??? @GauravJobanputra AndrewBowne_0-1723833121538.png

‎08-15-2024

Easy Fix: Go into the configuration of your Space Planner app & navigate to the last step in the config. Here is where the field for unit name is defined across the app. If you were to change it here, you'll achieve what you are looking for. Note: When doing this, you'll change the way the unit names are displayed across the app. AndrewBowne_0-1723725356959.png

‎08-15-2024

Yes, just make sure they are drawn at the right elevation and are connected to other pathways. You'll also need to rebuild your network.

‎06-27-2024

Were you ever able to get this figured out? I'm running into the same issue where Make (Integromat) doesn't seem to recognize my WHERE clause.

‎06-26-2024

It'd be nice to be able to pass URL Parameters to filter floors through the widget also.

‎06-14-2024

Having the same issue here with 11.1

‎06-13-2024

YES! This would be particularly helpful when sorting days of the week.... I can't tell you how many complaints I get about the days of the week being in alphabetical and not logical order.

‎05-08-2024

I face the same issues with performance when displaying our details. We have very detailed... details..😄 for some very large facilites. What I have found to be the most helpful (but still not great) is to do the following: merge details by use type (if you have different use types) then merge each use type by level Run the Dice GP tool on each use type of each level. This will create "strips" of your details. I use 10,000 verticies per "strip". Store your details as a hosted feature layer or a File Geodatabase. Do not store and serve from an Enterprise GDB. It just can't handle it. Hopefully some day there will be an improvement for this. Vector Tile layers sounds like it might be the answer but they are not (yet) floor aware. That could be a game changer.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎09-24-2025 09:52 AM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by Andrew-Bowne

Experience Builder Floor Filter Widget with Branch Versioned Data

Indoor Viewer with Branch Versioned Data

Re: Can you version Hosted Feature Layers?

Can you version Hosted Feature Layers?

Re: Support Layers with Definition Query

Re: Space Planner - Incorrect Number of People Listed

Re: Space Planner - Incorrect Number of People Listed

Space Planner - Incorrect Number of People Listed

Re: Indoor Space Planner Units Display Not Holding Web Map Configuration

Re: Hand Draw Indoors Routing Pathways?

Re: Update hosted feature service using Integromat (Make)/webhooks

Re: Allow actions to select the floor filter

Re: Adding attachments in Map Viewer during feature create fails @ 11.1

Re: Provide setting for sort order of Filter Widget values lists

Re: What is the best way to store Detail data?

Re: Blank Map Viewer for All Web Maps After ArcGIS...

Re: Mapping assets in Indoors

Frequently needing to clear browser cache - Experi...

Re: Edit Widget- Submit button is missing

Re: 11.5 upgrade cache issues

GIS Leadership User Group