POST
|
From our limited use ArcGIS for AutoCAD seems to shine creating new features or editing existing GIS features from an ArcGIS Feature Service. However we have a lot of data in native CAD format and this tool does not appear to allow classifying or promoting existing CAD features to GIS features. This is unfortunate because we really do not want to redraft things which already exist in CAD. Maybe this enhancement will be considered in the future. This means we continue to use shapefile exports from AutoCAD map as well as FME when the drawings are more complex or contain related data.
... View more
09-25-2018
02:17 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2387
|
IDEA
|
I like this idea but how about the ability to display a basic table, I cannot even find that option?
... View more
07-11-2018
03:31 PM
|
7
|
0
|
3711
|
IDEA
|
Some workflows require obtaining multiple datasets from an open data provider and downloading them one at a time is a pain, especially when consuming the File geodatabase format. The result is the end-user obtains a number of zipped file geodatabases for each dataset, requiring unzipping and then they contain a single feature class so merging them into a single datastore is also required. Consider adding a cart option so all datasets could be added to a cart. Once the user is ready they execute the cart and a single download is generated for them in the format specified. A zipped file of all spreadsheets, KML's, shapefile A zipped geodatabase of all datasets
... View more
04-10-2018
10:00 AM
|
7
|
1
|
804
|
POST
|
Adding SET NOCOUNT ON works for me to be able to call stored procedures using arcpy.ArcSDESQLExecute. This was last tested with version 10.5.1
... View more
04-04-2018
05:16 PM
|
3
|
0
|
2083
|
POST
|
The API reference above is correct. There is a search method which should do exactly what you need.
... View more
04-03-2018
06:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
10632
|
IDEA
|
This is from version 10.1 and 5 years later would still be nice to have automatic agents for most of the geodatabase functionality including rebuilding locators. We have automated this with python but what a pain ! Addresses and other landmarks get added, updated all day long. A replication, failed locator rebuild or failed to publish to server is just another hassle in this workflow and seems to me if it is in the database (enterprise, file, geopackage) index it and send it out. Other database and search platforms with indexes have process/workers that auto-update indexes, why not the GDB?
... View more
02-20-2018
08:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
528
|
IDEA
|
This is from version 10.1 and 5 years later would still be nice to have automatic agents for most of the geodatabase functionality including rebuilding locators. We have automated this with python but what a pain ! Addresses and other landmarks get added, updated all day long. A replication, failed locator rebuild or failed to publish to server is just another hassle in this workflow and seems to me if it is in the database (enterprise, file, geopackage) index it and send it out. Other database and search platforms with indexes have process/workers that auto-update indexes, why not the GDB?
... View more
02-20-2018
08:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
392
|
IDEA
|
In Web App Builder, it is frustrating the Group Filter widget does not have the same expression capabilities as the Filter widget. Please make the same or at least support the same capabilities. The filter widget operators appears to be context specific to field data types where as the Group Filter seems to be applying a generic set of operators. For example for dates there is no "is between" expression in Group Filter which exists in Filter. So if there are a number of layers which need to be filtered by a date range & unique value it is impossible unless you add multiple Filter widget which confused the end-user and results in a bad user experience. Other examples for string fields include "is blank" or "is not blank" ' Thanks for this consideration
... View more
02-07-2018
10:46 AM
|
9
|
1
|
1429
|
IDEA
|
It would be really helpful if the overview tab or alternative tab could be customized for each dataset. Ideally everything has a default view but many datasets such as tables and specific spatial datasets could really benefit by charts or embedded web maps residing on the landing page of the dataset. Open data serves many different user communities and for the executive or average citizen user populations they do not want or care about much on the overview or data page. They want to see a visualization immediately so they can gain information about the dataset and how it relates to them. I see a number of agencies using ESRI Open Data for spatial and other solutions for tabular. Maybe supporting custom visualizations natively in the overview or another "tab" as the default view could solve this problem for many.
... View more
08-31-2017
12:40 PM
|
8
|
0
|
647
|
IDEA
|
Thank you for the clarification regarding this idea and the current support for alternate name table. We just tested this and it worked so that can help us in some regards. I still support and vote for this idea. It would be nice if alias table was supported so we can tie our structures/landmarks data model to the point addresses so we can avoid individual locators for each structure type.
... View more
08-24-2017
02:43 PM
|
0
|
1
|
523
|
IDEA
|
Thank you for the clarification regarding this idea and the current support for alternate name table. We just tested this and it worked so that can help us in some regards. I still support and vote for this idea. It would be nice if alias table was supported so we can tie our structures/landmarks data model to the point addresses so we can avoid individual locators for each structure type.
... View more
08-24-2017
02:43 PM
|
0
|
1
|
474
|
POST
|
We had a very similar problem yesterday and ran into this thread. However none of the above mentioned "work-a-rounds" worked for us so we reported an issue to support this morning. The issue was replicated by support staff and they generated a new BUG for this incident which we are hoping is resolved soon. It has stopped us in our tracks and surprised it has not been reported by anyone else. BUG-000107479 - Open Data:Items shared with open data group are not there in open data site.
... View more
08-18-2017
01:03 PM
|
3
|
4
|
1657
|
IDEA
|
Please add this, it has been several years and something very critical for basic geocoding. The local govt data model does not have a Street Alias table but the reality is there can be multiple street names possible for a given segment. Not having this fails to locate these alternate street names (County Roads, State Highways, Historical) all can have alternative names or abbreviated forms.
... View more
08-15-2017
12:12 PM
|
0
|
1
|
523
|
IDEA
|
Please add this, it has been several years and something very critical for basic geocoding. The local govt data model does not have a Street Alias table but the reality is there can be multiple street names possible for a given segment. Not having this fails to locate these alternate street names (County Roads, State Highways, Historical) all can have alternative names or abbreviated forms.
... View more
08-15-2017
12:12 PM
|
0
|
1
|
474
|
POST
|
Using the arcgis python API, is it possible to restrict search results to exact matches by title? My query is title:City_Boundaries and owner:username and the search is returning other "City_Boundary" matches and would like to restrict to exact matches. I reviewed this search documentation and could not find anything related to exact matches ArcGIS REST API
... View more
08-14-2017
02:06 PM
|
2
|
8
|
8927
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 01-04-2024 08:13 AM | |
1 | 12-07-2022 01:27 PM | |
1 | 02-03-2023 08:49 AM | |
2 | 10-25-2022 11:32 AM | |
6 | 09-01-2021 10:15 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|