|
IDEA
|
This is from version 10.1 and 5 years later would still be nice to have automatic agents for most of the geodatabase functionality including rebuilding locators. We have automated this with python but what a pain ! Addresses and other landmarks get added, updated all day long. A replication, failed locator rebuild or failed to publish to server is just another hassle in this workflow and seems to me if it is in the database (enterprise, file, geopackage) index it and send it out. Other database and search platforms with indexes have process/workers that auto-update indexes, why not the GDB?
... View more
02-20-2018
08:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1347
|
|
IDEA
|
In Web App Builder, it is frustrating the Group Filter widget does not have the same expression capabilities as the Filter widget. Please make the same or at least support the same capabilities. The filter widget operators appears to be context specific to field data types where as the Group Filter seems to be applying a generic set of operators. For example for dates there is no "is between" expression in Group Filter which exists in Filter. So if there are a number of layers which need to be filtered by a date range & unique value it is impossible unless you add multiple Filter widget which confused the end-user and results in a bad user experience. Other examples for string fields include "is blank" or "is not blank" ' Thanks for this consideration
... View more
02-07-2018
10:46 AM
|
9
|
1
|
1951
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be really helpful if the overview tab or alternative tab could be customized for each dataset. Ideally everything has a default view but many datasets such as tables and specific spatial datasets could really benefit by charts or embedded web maps residing on the landing page of the dataset. Open data serves many different user communities and for the executive or average citizen user populations they do not want or care about much on the overview or data page. They want to see a visualization immediately so they can gain information about the dataset and how it relates to them. I see a number of agencies using ESRI Open Data for spatial and other solutions for tabular. Maybe supporting custom visualizations natively in the overview or another "tab" as the default view could solve this problem for many.
... View more
08-31-2017
12:40 PM
|
8
|
0
|
1014
|
|
IDEA
|
Thank you for the clarification regarding this idea and the current support for alternate name table. We just tested this and it worked so that can help us in some regards. I still support and vote for this idea. It would be nice if alias table was supported so we can tie our structures/landmarks data model to the point addresses so we can avoid individual locators for each structure type.
... View more
08-24-2017
02:43 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1242
|
|
IDEA
|
Thank you for the clarification regarding this idea and the current support for alternate name table. We just tested this and it worked so that can help us in some regards. I still support and vote for this idea. It would be nice if alias table was supported so we can tie our structures/landmarks data model to the point addresses so we can avoid individual locators for each structure type.
... View more
08-24-2017
02:43 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1207
|
|
POST
|
We had a very similar problem yesterday and ran into this thread. However none of the above mentioned "work-a-rounds" worked for us so we reported an issue to support this morning. The issue was replicated by support staff and they generated a new BUG for this incident which we are hoping is resolved soon. It has stopped us in our tracks and surprised it has not been reported by anyone else. BUG-000107479 - Open Data:Items shared with open data group are not there in open data site.
... View more
08-18-2017
01:03 PM
|
3
|
4
|
4120
|
|
IDEA
|
Please add this, it has been several years and something very critical for basic geocoding. The local govt data model does not have a Street Alias table but the reality is there can be multiple street names possible for a given segment. Not having this fails to locate these alternate street names (County Roads, State Highways, Historical) all can have alternative names or abbreviated forms.
... View more
08-15-2017
12:12 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1242
|
|
IDEA
|
Please add this, it has been several years and something very critical for basic geocoding. The local govt data model does not have a Street Alias table but the reality is there can be multiple street names possible for a given segment. Not having this fails to locate these alternate street names (County Roads, State Highways, Historical) all can have alternative names or abbreviated forms.
... View more
08-15-2017
12:12 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1207
|
|
POST
|
Using the arcgis python API, is it possible to restrict search results to exact matches by title? My query is title:City_Boundaries and owner:username and the search is returning other "City_Boundary" matches and would like to restrict to exact matches. I reviewed this search documentation and could not find anything related to exact matches ArcGIS REST API
... View more
08-14-2017
02:06 PM
|
2
|
9
|
13401
|
|
IDEA
|
In Pro 2.0 it does not appear it is possible to create a new map within the project. Please consider adding a method to the ArcGISProject object with the ability to create a new map with a name from arcpy. Alternatively a copy map method on the existing Map object would be a workable alternative You can copy/paste maps manually in a project so this functionality seems like a necessary addition for additional project automation.
... View more
08-11-2017
12:57 PM
|
60
|
15
|
20556
|
|
POST
|
This is an old thread but have any of you tried removing all quotes conveniently added by the tool? #NIM102585 In ArcGIS Desktop 10.2.2, the quotes have to be either removed or modified in the Expression column of the Make Query table tool to run the tool successfully.
... View more
07-28-2017
03:20 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2776
|
|
IDEA
|
Hosted Feature Services in Portal/AGOL seem to create feature records without respecting the data model behind the feature class. Please fix this functionality so the platform does not commit a database record unless all constraints are dealt with by the user. At this time both Portal and AGOL platform's allow the creation of feature records when NOT NULL constraints exist. This defeats the purpose of data integrity and the very reason we want to set NOT NULL constraints. Feature Class definition - prior to publish Hosted Feature Layer The current experience is ArcGIS Online will prompt the user for fields which are NOT NULL with an exclamation icon indicating the value is required, however the user can just close the window and the record is saved. The result is a "space" is saved in the NOT NULL field. This goes around the entire data model and is not desirable as it leads to messy data collections and allowing users to by pass required fields. Granted they could type a space in as well but the platform should not do this by default. The experience is the same in Portal 10.5 except it does not show the exclamation point to the user in the fields window. Tracing the activity in Portal shows the record is actually created in the database once geometry is defined (applyEdits) and then an edit window pops up for the end user which then passes another applyEdits. Querying the hosted feature service rest end point shows the records are being created with spaces in the NOT NULL fields even if the user does not interact with the feature. Please fix this so no records are saved in the database unless a user has completed entering values, do not bypass NOT NULL fields with automatic space values which by passes the feature class field constraints.
... View more
06-29-2017
02:48 PM
|
8
|
1
|
1040
|
|
IDEA
|
Hosted Feature Services in Portal/AGOL seem to create feature records without respecting the data model behind the feature class. Please fix this functionality so the platform does not commit a database record unless all constraints are dealt with by the user. At this time both Portal and AGOL platform's allow the creation of feature records when NOT NULL constraints exist. This defeats the purpose of data integrity and the very reason we want to set NOT NULL constraints. Feature Class definition - prior to publish Hosted Feature Layer The current experience is ArcGIS Online will prompt the user for fields which are NOT NULL with an exclamation icon indicating the value is required, however the user can just close the window and the record is saved. The result is a "space" is saved in the NOT NULL field. This goes around the entire data model and is not desirable as it leads to messy data collections and allowing users to by pass required fields. Granted they could type a space in as well but the platform should not do this by default. The experience is the same in Portal 10.5 except it does not show the exclamation point to the user in the fields window. Tracing the activity in Portal shows the record is actually created in the database once geometry is defined (applyEdits) and then an edit window pops up for the end user which then passes another applyEdits. Querying the hosted feature service rest end point shows the records are being created with spaces in the NOT NULL fields even if the user does not interact with the feature. Please fix this so no records are saved in the database unless a user has completed entering values, do not bypass NOT NULL fields with automatic space values which by passes the feature class field constraints.
... View more
06-29-2017
02:48 PM
|
8
|
1
|
782
|
|
IDEA
|
Isn't this what Windows folder shortcuts are for? ArcGIS Desktop has never supported folder shortcuts or the standard windows application file system navigation. Either way why not have both options? Add support for Windows folder shortcuts for those who already have a folders of places they want to go and can share with users. Keep the connect to folder for those who want the project style connections
... View more
06-05-2017
03:34 PM
|
3
|
1
|
2306
|
|
IDEA
|
Simple point feature service layer for collecting hazardous events. Once the location is collected it would be wonderful to have a reverse geocode to determine approx address, as well as intersection with polygon layers such as response zone, City Name from a variety of sources. Expression & GenerateID would be helpful since the ID could be based on response type or geographic area. The following can support a number of workflows with very simple data models. Reverse Geocode Intersect Expression Generate ID
... View more
04-24-2017
05:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
7302
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 08-18-2025 08:52 AM | |
| 2 | 03-04-2025 10:51 AM | |
| 1 | 01-04-2024 08:13 AM | |
| 2 | 12-07-2022 01:27 PM | |
| 1 | 02-03-2023 08:49 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|