|
POST
|
Thanks Eric, I haven't found a specific organization setting that causes this issue. However, if you wanted to try a quick test it would help confirm if it was the same issue I have seen in the past: In the organization where it is failing, go to your content and click Create > Feature Layer Select From Url and paste the following url, https://services7.arcgis.com/GH2HnPU0MTsXT4xa/arcgis/rest/services/DebrisReports_v2/FeatureServer Click Next through the next couple of pages, make the title of the item 'DebrisReports_v2' and give it any tag Click Done to create the service If the theory is right you will get an error because the org doesn't like the service name 'DebrisReports_v2'. I have found if you repeat the steps and change the title at step 3 it creates the service with no issues.
... View more
07-26-2018
12:47 PM
|
0
|
8
|
3903
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jennifer, Eric, I am wondering if this is happening for all solutions or just particular solutions? I just attempted to deploy Capital Project Dashboard to my org and everything worked successfully. I believe I have encountered this error in the past, but it only occurred in specific organization with a couple of the solutions. The issue occurred when the tool was attempting to create the hosted feature layer. I found the org didn't like the name of the layer even though a layer didn't already exist in the org with the same name.
... View more
07-25-2018
06:53 AM
|
2
|
10
|
3903
|
|
POST
|
Hi Ben, we don't have a way to leverage these already published layers . It is something we are thinking about how we can better support. The issue is if you published the layers using the same schema provided in the LGIM than everything should work, but if they don't then the maps and apps would likely be broken.
... View more
07-20-2018
07:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1089
|
|
POST
|
Hi Ben, The Solution Deployment Tool will create new feature layers if they haven't already been deployed using the tool. However, if you deploy a solution that for example uses the SiteAddresses layer today and then tomorrow you deploy another solution that uses the SiteAddresses layer it will not create another copy of the layer, it will reuse the one that was previously deployed. So you will not need to manage multiple version of the layer for each Solution. If you are seeing this please share the details of the Solutions that you deployed that resulted in multiple versions of the same layer as this would be a bug. The tool doesn't find layers that were published outside of the deployment tool, so it is true if you published a SiteAddresses or Parcels layer separately the deployment tool will create a new version which will be used in future deployments of Solutions.
... View more
07-16-2018
10:09 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1089
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi Cinthia, Domains are stored differently in hosted feature services than geodatabase feature classes. In hosted feature services every domain is defined and stored with the field. Although the domain has a name property different domains with the same name can exist in the same layer. So this is why the tool was written the way it is and asks you select the field you want to modify the domain for, rather than selecting the domain you want to modify as you would with a geodatabase. One thing you could try is run the tool 1x on a field. You can then see the result of that tool run in the Catalog pane and drag it into a new model. From model builder you could try adding a iterator to repeat for the all the fields with the same domain.
... View more
05-22-2018
05:20 AM
|
1
|
0
|
3751
|
|
POST
|
Hi James, As a troubleshooting step if you set copy_data=False during the clone does it work successfully? I am just curious if it is failing during the creation of the feature service or if the problem occurs when attempting to copy the data between the services. -Chris
... View more
05-15-2018
07:16 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2265
|
|
POST
|
I haven't done any performance testing in this regard, but my guess is it would be faster via .NET and the Pro api. This theory is simply based on the fact that there is some overhead in executing a GP tool. The things that are nice about GP such as parameter validation, messages, and cleanup when you are working with the tool through the UI can add a little time to each operation that you won't incur in .NET.
... View more
04-26-2018
06:22 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3986
|
|
POST
|
Hi Luke, This is certainly a supported approach if you want to include geoprocessing tools with your add-in. I have done this in a couple of my add-ins when I had existing geoprocessing tools that I leverage in other workflows but also want to invoke them from custom controls in the UI. To package the toolbox with the add-in you will want to add the .pyt to your project, set the build action to 'None' and the Copy to Output Directory to 'Copy always'. When you build the project the toolbox will be packaged with the add-in along with your \assembly and any other dependencies. In your add-in code you can then get the path to the toolbox on disk using the path of the executing assembly: string installPath = Path.GetDirectoryName(System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location);
string toolboxPath = Path.Combine(installPath, "MyToolbox.pyt"); Now with the path to the toolbox you can either open the tool in the geoprocessing pane or execute the tool.
... View more
04-25-2018
06:02 AM
|
7
|
4
|
3986
|
|
POST
|
Hi Brian, Please check out the thread below. In it I describe how to author the pop-up and configure the arcade expressions to support the pop-up: https://community.esri.com/thread/207970-problem-with-the-capital-projects-solution-deployment-tool I would also recommend leveraging the Solution Deployment Tool described in the getting started section of the help for the Capital Projects Dashboard solution. This will lay down the layers, webmap and dashboard in your org already configured with everything you need for the solution.
... View more
03-13-2018
06:47 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1657
|
|
POST
|
Hi Michael, You found a bug in the solution. The original intent was that you set the status to Analysis and Review in the Capital Project Plans. The project would then show up in Capital Project Review and you could use this application to set the Funded Project to 'Yes' and update the status to Board Authorized when it was ready to move forward. This field wasn't exposed in the application. I updated the this on our side so if you delete the Capital Project Review web map and web application and re-deploy Capital Project Review you will get the update. Otherwise you can edit the pop-up to make the field visible and editable and edit the Funding and Status widget to expose the Funded Project field. To edit data in the Capital Project Review select one of the drawing tools in the Funding and Status widget and select one of the projects. This will pop up a dialog where you can edit attributes on the feature. The nice thing about this widget is you can select multiple projects and update their status all at once and you can use the filters in the app to narrow down the visible projects.
... View more
01-18-2018
10:07 AM
|
0
|
7
|
5256
|
|
POST
|
Hi Michael, I apologize you are having trouble with the Solutions Deployment Tool, I took a look at your support incident and it looks like you identified the issue with the firewall and will be working to setup a dedicated machine to deploy the solutions. In regards to your question about the pop-up configuration. The solution is using a custom pop-up attribute display. You will want to add the following html: <font face="Avenir Light">The <b>{PROJNAME}</b> project will accomplish the following: <br /><br />{PROJDESC}<br /><br /></font><font face="Avenir Light"><b>Schedule</b><br /><br />Planned Start Date: <b>{PLANSTART}</b><br />Actual Start Date: <b>{ACTSTART}</b><br /><br />Planned Completion Date: <b>{PLANEND}</b> <br />Actual Completion Date: <b>{ACTEND}</b><br /></font><font face="Avenir Light"><br />
<span><b>Phase</b></span>
<table style=" border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 6px 4px; width: 100%; table-layout: fixed;">
<tbody><tr height="16">
<td style="{expression/expr2}"></td>
<td style="{expression/expr3}"></td>
<td style="{expression/expr4}"></td>
<td style="{expression/expr5}"></td>
</tr>
<tr height="24" style="text-align: center;">
<td>PreDesign</td>
<td>Design</td>
<td>Construction</td>
<td>Closeout</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</font><font face="Avenir Light"><b>Budget</b><br /> <br />The project is </font><b><font face="Avenir Light"><font color="#228b22">{expression/expr0}</font><font color="#ff0000">{expression/expr1}</font><font color="#000000">.<br /> </font></font></b><font face="Avenir Light"><br />If you have any questions, please contact:<br /><br /><b>{POCNAME}<br /></b>T: {POCPHONE}<br /><a href="mailto: {POCEMAIL}" target="_blank">{POCEMAIL}</a> </font> Next you will need to add some attribute expressions: First add an attribute expression called Under Budget if ($feature.actcost <= $feature.estcost) {
return Text(Abs($feature.actcost - $feature.estcost), '$#,###') + ' under budget'
}
return Add an attribute expression called Over Budget if ($feature.actcost > $feature.estcost) {
return Text(Abs($feature.actcost - $feature.estcost), '$#,###') + ' over budget'
}
return Add an attribute expression called PreDesign if ($feature.projphase == 'PreDesign') {
return 'background-color:#1987bb'
}
return 'background-color:#DDDDDD' Repeat the previous step for the phases Design, Construction, and Closeout replacing the text in the code with the appropriate phase. This should be everything you need to define the custom pop-up display. I see in the technical support incident you also had a question about how to change the project to funded and then after that how you edit the actual start date, actual cost, project phase or other active project information. To edit the project phase you are going to use the Capital Project Review application and to edit information about the active projects you will want to use the Capital Project Reports application.
... View more
01-18-2018
07:44 AM
|
1
|
9
|
5256
|
|
POST
|
This bug has been resolved in the latest version of the X-Ray add-in. -Chris
... View more
08-02-2017
07:18 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2733
|
|
POST
|
Thanks John, so were you able to get the add-in to work by adding an exception for that folder? I also wanted to note for anyone else who might come across this post in the future that this AssemblyCache folder is used by all add-ins so if you are having an issue with add-ins causing ArcGIS Pro to crash, this might be the cause.
... View more
08-01-2017
07:03 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1493
|
|
POST
|
I am wondering if it specifically doesn't like writing .dlls to that folder. Could you try changing the add-in file extension to .zip and then extracting the contents. Next inside the install folder copy/paste everything into the AssemblyCache/{a8c04e88-6d5d-498d-ad00-b76b409b5cd3}. It should paste successfully and not prompt you to run as an administrator.
... View more
07-31-2017
10:46 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1493
|
|
POST
|
Do you see the folder called {a8c04e88-6d5d-498d-ad00-b76b409b5cd3} in the assembly cache folder? If not could you try creating it, and are you able to create a new text file in that directory? If it still fails could you send me the new crash dump?
... View more
07-31-2017
09:05 AM
|
0
|
5
|
6616
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06-16-2026 06:03 AM | |
| 1 | 03-05-2026 06:12 AM | |
| 1 | 02-06-2026 09:24 AM | |
| 1 | 11-07-2025 07:59 AM | |
| 1 | 11-06-2025 07:04 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Friday
|