Latest Contributions by AdrianWelsh

This sounds very interesting and I'd love to see the final product! My guess is to not use the WKID but to use the official title of the coordinate system from the details I haven't tried this but that would be what I would suspect. I am curious to hear what you find out from this!  And, you have to be sure that you are using a Spatial map series for this. Looking at this documentation, that is the only support for coordinate systems. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/layouts/map-series.htm   ... View more

Good question and I don't have a good answer. I would suggest making an ArcGIS Idea for this enhancement.  ... View more

Apparently so! By being in the MVP group, I am also a moderator on the site, which allows me to create blog posts and such. Sorry about that! ... View more

Ugh, that is annoying. It looks like someone else came across this error. While there is an active BUG out there, there are potential solutions and work arounds. I would start with trying a Repair Geometry to see if that helps. Here is the old post with this issue https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/feature-layer-inconsistently-not-editable-in/td-p/1500631  ... View more

That is pretty annoying and I hope that Esri Support can find a solution. I suppose it does not sound too unusual that you are having issues modifying a line from a hosted feature service since that sounds like there would be extra complications there. I have issues in regular ArcGIS Pro when I modify a curved line (like messing with the vertices and such - it sometimes completely blows up my line). My advice would be drawing the lines separately and merging them back in (and of course, cutting out the old ones with the split tool). It is kind of a pain but it's a workaround. ... View more

Sorry about that, Dave, I did not realize that blog creation was somewhat restricted. @MErikReedAugusta made a suggestion to the Esri Community folks about this post and a few others and I think that the Community folks will be reaching out to you about this and helping you to turn these into official blogs.  ... View more

I am not sure that can be accomplished in one single geoprocessing operation. I am guessing a one to many would result in giving you more features (municipalities) than what you started with, thus it makes sense that each one is 1 or 0. You would likely need to perform a Summary Statistics process to make a table counting all the points within your municipalities, then tabularly join that table back to your spatially joined feature class. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/analysis/summary-statistics.htm  Unless I am not fully understanding the issue here. ... View more

What happens if you go to this link https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-blog/bg-p/arcgis-pro-blog and click on New Article?   ... View more

Dan, my first guess would be that it does not have a GPS fix and cannot actually get a lat/long without this fix. Are you able to verify that there is a GPS fix and the device should be able to tell its location? ... View more

I also forgot to mention changing the wording of the "No Data" to something more valuable to the user:   ... View more

Yes, you are facing a common issue with dashboard filtering. Dashboards filter well but there isn't an 'indicator' showing that a filter is active. There are a couple of ways to perhaps mitigate this. 1. Have a gauge widget that shows total records and then selected records. This will let the user know that there is a filter in place. (label these values too)   2. Allow dashboard reset so users can reset all the filters easily:   3.  Put really good info in a splash window to explain how to use the dashboard.    These are just some ideas that could help. ... View more

I could not find this in the documentation! Thanks for posting this. (saved me a bit of headache, but also, I wish that I could see deviceid, or something similar, on the web form). ... View more

Wow, this is an excellent post. I am glad that you followed the rule of never using WGS84 Web Mercator to calculate anything! When you first mentioned having all your polygons be spatially joined with the local StatePlane and then manually calculating each region individually, it made me wonder if you could run that in ModelBuilder with an iteration that looped through each feature and used a field of Coordinate System that would have the exact wording of the StatePlane name. Then you brought up geodesic... I honestly had never though twice about that and am very curious to know what the experts have to say about that. If geodesic is the answer, then this is a huge game changer! I am tagging @MelitaKennedy and @BojanŠavrič to see if they have any insight on this. ... View more