Latest Contributions by NicolasGIS

Hi @GlenterpriseUK , Thanks for your reply. OK, noted. As it was generated by Portal for ArcGIS for ArcGIS for Server, I would have expected that it could at least be introspected by Portal for ArcGIS. My main problem is then how can I introspect this token ? I didn't find any other REST end point for doing so in the documentation. Thanks, Best regards, Nicolas ... View more

It turned out to be data related. Once we identified the service, we recreated all the features classes that this service was consuming and afterward we no longer faced the issue. ... View more

Did you configure include OBJECT STORE in webgisdr config file ? ... View more

Good to know. Thanks for your reply. Much appreciated. ... View more

Hello @Sarah_Hanson, Thanks for your reply. As you seem to be aware about response caching, I was wondering if you have any reply to this question: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-in-the-cloud-questions/response-caching-with-cloud-object-store/m-p/1634601#M903  Is CDN cache supported for non-hosted feature layers or in the pipeline ?   Thanks ... View more

Hello @ChrisDunn1, Any update on this issue ? Our workers are losing a lot of time on the field because of this issue as they have to scan many times the same barcode to get the proper value. Another complain from them is that the scanning area (rectangle) is much smaller than it used to be making it even more difficult to scan not easily accessible bar code.  To put it in a nutshell, Field maps > 25.2 generated a big decrease of productivity and dissatisfaction from our workers. I keep saying it will be fixed at some point but as they are using it on a daily basis, it generates a lot of frustration. What would you recommand ? Should an official BUG be logged ? Is it maybe already the case ? Thanks ... View more

Would be great to improve the placement which currently is limited to "always-horizontal". I am really missing the "Straight in polygon" option from ArcGIS Pro... MapService:   FeatureLayer:       ... View more

Hello , Thanks for your reply @ArchitSrivastava. this is expected behavior in a multi-machine ArcGIS Server site. > Don't you think it is a pitty ? Shouldn't there be something cleverer that prevent penalizing multi machines setups ? Should an idea be logged or do you think it is pointless ? To me, multi machines setup should be transparent client side specially when responses are identical ! Rather than relying on ETags, Esri recommends controlling client-side caching using thecacheControlMaxAgeproperty. > The problem is that I configured "cacheControlMaxAge" property on this service and for a reason unknown to me, it does not apply to request in the form of: https://gis.company.com/arcgis/rest/services/General/Data/MapServer/86?f=json&token=Foo It does work on 'query' request: returns: Good, this request will be cached for 30 minutes. But the request: https://gis.company.com/arcgis/rest/services/General/Data/MapServer/86?f=json&token=Foo even if "cacheControlMaxAge" is configured always returns "max-age=0" and as the 'etag' headers changes depending on machine replying, this is never cached nor getting a 302:   Any reason why  @ArchitSrivastava ? @JoshuaBixby I think it may depend on your service data source. On one service consumming data from SDE, I do have the same reply accross machines but for services referencing a file geodatabase data source, I am getting different Etag Header even if file geodatabase is identical. Might be interesting to know what is actually taken into account to generate this ETag header.       ... View more

Hi, No, I am using webadaptor on each VM and there is a front load balancer. Don’t think the issue is related to WebAdaptor as you can replicate when by passing it it. Hope it is clearer    ... View more