Latest Contributions by NicolasGIS

Hello @ChrisDunn1, Any update on this issue ? Our workers are losing a lot of time on the field because of this issue as they have to scan many times the same barcode to get the proper value. Another complain from them is that the scanning area (rectangle) is much smaller than it used to be making it even more difficult to scan not easily accessible bar code.  To put it in a nutshell, Field maps > 25.2 generated a big decrease of productivity and dissatisfaction from our workers. I keep saying it will be fixed at some point but as they are using it on a daily basis, it generates a lot of frustration. What would you recommand ? Should an official BUG be logged ? Is it maybe already the case ? Thanks ... View more

Would be great to improve the placement which currently is limited to "always-horizontal". I am really missing the "Straight in polygon" option from ArcGIS Pro... MapService:   FeatureLayer:       ... View more

Hello , Thanks for your reply @ArchitSrivastava. this is expected behavior in a multi-machine ArcGIS Server site. > Don't you think it is a pitty ? Shouldn't there be something cleverer that prevent penalizing multi machines setups ? Should an idea be logged or do you think it is pointless ? To me, multi machines setup should be transparent client side specially when responses are identical ! Rather than relying on ETags, Esri recommends controlling client-side caching using thecacheControlMaxAgeproperty. > The problem is that I configured "cacheControlMaxAge" property on this service and for a reason unknown to me, it does not apply to request in the form of: https://gis.company.com/arcgis/rest/services/General/Data/MapServer/86?f=json&token=Foo It does work on 'query' request: returns: Good, this request will be cached for 30 minutes. But the request: https://gis.company.com/arcgis/rest/services/General/Data/MapServer/86?f=json&token=Foo even if "cacheControlMaxAge" is configured always returns "max-age=0" and as the 'etag' headers changes depending on machine replying, this is never cached nor getting a 302:   Any reason why  @ArchitSrivastava ? @JoshuaBixby I think it may depend on your service data source. On one service consumming data from SDE, I do have the same reply accross machines but for services referencing a file geodatabase data source, I am getting different Etag Header even if file geodatabase is identical. Might be interesting to know what is actually taken into account to generate this ETag header.       ... View more

Hi, No, I am using webadaptor on each VM and there is a front load balancer. Don’t think the issue is related to WebAdaptor as you can replicate when by passing it it. Hope it is clearer    ... View more

Hi @gpgisandsky, Happy to read I helped ! No news from ESRI no but if interested, I believe you should promote my Idea: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/arcgis-pro-should-allow-publishing-webmap-bigger/idi-p/1645135 and eventually contact support to have you attached to ENH-000175387 and eventually escalate it... Thanks  ... View more

Seems like it is still not fixed at 12.0 😕 https://content.esri.com/support/downloads/other_/120-issuesaddressedlist_11192025.pdf ... View more

Still not there in 12.0 😕 ... View more

hi, When using registerToken, does your token follow the typing ? https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/api-reference/esri-identity-IdentityManager.html#registerToken Pretty sure you are missing “server” from the error. At least something seems missing…   Just a wild guess    ... View more

Hi @dimesv, I am facing the exact same issue. We are trying to display our burried networks through FeatureServices and it just takes almost one minute before view is fully refreshed after having zoomed in/out. I see just like you hundred of requests spawned whenever I am zooming in/out as it is refreshing features, layer per layer, taking ages... It is clearly not supportable. We are coming from 3.X and used to display them as MapImageService but wanted to go for FeatureLayers to have more configuration client side but the basic functionnality of simply displaying the data is already not satisfactory. I would be curious to know if you made some progress on your investigations ? I am really surprised a web app built with Maps SDK for Javascript can display a webmap 10 times faster than with the bare API ! Also, you mentionned: I have a a web map with a few layers May I ask how many layers does your webmap have ? Thanks ... View more

Hello @Priya_Das, Thanks for your reply.  I confirm the tool does return "ERROR 000816: The tool is not valid.”. The thing is that I made a simple toolbox with no additional dependencies as it was not working and the error remains ! It is working successfully with default 'arcgispro-py3' environment configured but as soon as I configure it to run with the clone environment following closely: https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/latest/publish-services/windows/deploying-custom-python-packages.htm It fails. Anyway, support was able to reproduce and logged the following: BUG-000180379: ERROR 000816: The tool is not valid.” returned for geoprocessing services published from Python toolboxes (PYT) when using cloned Python environments   Now I am more looking a workaround as I guess I can't hope for a patch for that, can I ?   Thanks ... View more

Hello , Thanks for sharing @HenryLindemann. I am facing the same issue. Need to run a routine over all my users and I now have 12000. I tested your sample and on my side running: users_count = user_manager.advanced_search(query=f"{portal_id} AND !_esri", return_count=True) returns: 10000... So the hard limit remains.    I am thinking about iterating through the alphabet 'a*', 'b*', ... 'z*': users = user_manager.advanced_search(query=f"{portal_id} AND !_esri AND username:a*")   Any other (cleverer) idea by any chance ?   ... View more