|
IDEA
|
For me the attribute table is where this issue exists. But really any where the Record GUID appears in the context of a parcel or parcel line. i.e. retired by: Record Number or name created by: Record Number or Name is more useful information to display in my workflow than the Record GUID. Historic Parcels same story. I think it should be the default behavior, as the Parcel Fabric is Records-Driven and as a user, I certainly care more about the Name/Number I have assigned a record than the Record GUID that the system assigns for me automatically. Below in Green I have highlighted a sample of my table of the field view. It's my parcel layer. Thanks for the links about adding this info to a popup. I will try that too. The active record doesn't display the GUID, similar story for the attribute editor displayed in your message.
... View more
11-24-2021
07:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2917
|
|
IDEA
|
Add a toggle switch that reduces the available layers to only the selectable and/or editable layers for both the Target and the Source drop-downs within the "Field Mapping" setup for the Attribute Transfer Tool.
... View more
11-23-2021
02:31 PM
|
1
|
9
|
3147
|
|
IDEA
|
Display Record Numbers/Names in Parcel/Parcel line Fields that depict "Retired by" and "Created by" attributes instead of GUID of the Record. The GUID is definitely less useful when trying to determine parcel lineage to a user.
... View more
11-23-2021
02:18 PM
|
0
|
14
|
3638
|
|
POST
|
and to be clear, the misclose distance in Pro is 0.01 feet, and graphically it looks like it closes too within the Parcel Drafter tool. Anyway I guess I wonder if the error displayed in the tool is a bug of some kind. I have tried to build the polygon with a chord-bearing/distance instead of the curve in this description. And that seems to close properly. Other practice descriptions close when curves or arcs are not included. Thanks for any and all insight.
... View more
09-16-2021
02:53 PM
|
0
|
0
|
960
|
|
POST
|
Here is my version of the Web App Builder with Parcel Drafter Tool. https://archuletaco.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappbuilder/index.html?id=8852136f9dde44c7a331500110ccb4b1 I am adding a legal description highlighted between the Green highlights: In the below image I have added the calls for the Legal Description. Graphically it closes, (and adding it in ArcGIS Pro using the Traverse tools, it also closes). But I have highlighted in the image below that the Drafter tool indicates that the Misclose distance is 39.49 feet at an angle of N 0-00-00E. The legal description does not contain specific information about the arc’s Chord bearing and so those details have been calculated using *tb and assuming tangent bearing from the previous line. And it does seem to match our existing parcels as shown in Orange. To allow the Parcel Drafter tool to close and create the purple polygon as shown below, I have configured the app to allow very large closing error/misclose ratios.
... View more
09-16-2021
12:13 PM
|
0
|
1
|
971
|
|
POST
|
The Layout's orientation, Color setting from Pro should override the default printer setting by default. Why is that such a scandal? it would be nice if I didn't have to look this problem up.
... View more
11-04-2020
08:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3508
|
|
POST
|
as a work around, Running the notebook in Jupyter notebooks (not Jupyter Lab) the Mapview displays properly. There does seem to be a mapview.jupyter_target variable that's listed on the arcgis.widgets module api reference that is read_only. though it can be set to "lab" or other string if you force it. But that doesn't seem to help anything. Also prior to setting it as I show below, reading the data produces an empty string. I don't understand if this variable is just not set, but it also seems like it should be set based on the IDE you're using. Is that the disconnect here? This seems like the problem variable but again how to reset a read_only variable is elusive to me right now.
... View more
04-17-2020
10:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4905
|
|
POST
|
I have had the same experience of restarting Pro and "fixing" the issue.
... View more
04-17-2020
10:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
34443
|
|
POST
|
For me, our organization switched to a different web security provider not because of this issue, but for other reasons. So I haven’t experienced the problem since then. I reckon if you’re dealing with the uncontrolled zoom out it hasn’t been fixed; but I haven’t seen anything in particular to confirm or deny a fix.
... View more
02-20-2020
09:53 AM
|
0
|
1
|
4485
|
|
POST
|
At some point during my use of ArcGIS Pro 2.3, I confront with this image. It comes when I have tried to open a data table from a feature class that's in my project. My feature classes link to a SQL Server table that's immutable. Anyway, is the issue that my data linkages are unindexed? The ole' turning it back off and back on again (restarting ArcGIS pro) seems to fix the issue at least temporarily.
... View more
02-12-2019
02:34 PM
|
8
|
13
|
39052
|
|
POST
|
I would just like to confirm that I am also using Webroot. It's an intermittent issue. I can't pinpoint the action or set of actions that I engage in that cause the behavior. but I am interested in this Webroot bug as an explanation, and of course resolution.
... View more
05-20-2018
07:11 AM
|
2
|
0
|
9561
|
|
POST
|
This is typical of the error message that I get trying to open the Atttribute Table for my joined parcels data in Pro. and additionally if I import a map document from an .mxd the join seems to import too. However too many changes or manipulations to the attribute table in pro gives the above message. Prior to this message I had re-arranged a few fields that I am interested in within the attribute table fields view.
... View more
04-25-2018
09:10 AM
|
0
|
0
|
963
|
|
POST
|
it's 64-bit. The above is from SQL Server Management Studio. Properties of the Server.
... View more
04-25-2018
08:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
963
|
|
POST
|
Running Pro 2.1.0 and Microsoft SQL Server 12.0.5203.0. Wishing to join on a field between SQL and Parcels' layer. The particular table that I am joining to in SQL Server is a View of another table, but in ArcGIS it shows up as a table. Anyway Join eventually fails, though this behavior works properly in ArcGIS Desktop.
... View more
04-24-2018
03:17 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1105
|
|
POST
|
I have just reverted to 2.1.0, and the issue seemed to be resolved, or at least I could avoid it. I didn't do anything specific, and I would say that this issue was at 2.0. Next time I will note it more carefully.
... View more
04-24-2018
02:58 PM
|
3
|
1
|
9561
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 08-13-2024 05:20 PM | |
| 1 | 05-14-2025 11:24 AM | |
| 3 | 08-13-2024 05:14 PM | |
| 2 | 06-26-2022 11:45 AM | |
| 1 | 11-23-2021 02:31 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|