|
POST
|
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to help in the instances where we are having this issue.
... View more
01-07-2020
07:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2528
|
|
POST
|
Hi Josh, It has been over a year with no update to that bug. Do you have any estimate for when this will be corrected? It seems to affect any related tables, not only those generated via Survey123 Connect. Thanks, Erica
... View more
01-07-2020
07:09 AM
|
0
|
1
|
4316
|
|
POST
|
Is there any way to get this escalated? I have been trying to move all my field collectors into Collector and away from Classic, but this issue is preventing that from happening. It also means many people have to know when to use Collector and when to use Classic which can get confusing.
... View more
12-05-2019
04:46 AM
|
3
|
0
|
1672
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks Alex, I will give that a try. Do you happen to know if this works when appending data directly into an AGOL feature service?
... View more
11-25-2019
04:46 AM
|
0
|
1
|
8107
|
|
IDEA
|
It is critical to be able to maintain GlobalIDs when transferring data from one feature class to another. As an example, we are moving ArcGIS Online accounts right now and I am re-building surveys and appending data. I am unable to run the Append tool with the "Maintain GlobalDIs" checked - I get the 999999 error. My input data is local, and the target is an editable ArcGIS Online feature layer with an exact schema match. There are 377 related records that depend on the GlobalID being maintained, and it's not possible.
... View more
11-19-2019
07:19 AM
|
0
|
1
|
8111
|
|
IDEA
|
Currently, it is possible to sum the values across one repeat using the syntax sum(${survey_question}) within your XLS form. I would like to see the ability to create an equation that can deal with multiple sum statements, allowing survey designers the ability to add/subtract the total value summed across one repeat field with the total value summed across another repeat field. For example: sum(${survey_question1}) + sum(${survey_question2}) sum(${survey_question1}) - sum(${survey_question2}) sum(${survey_question1}) + sum(${survey_question2}) - sum(${survey_question3}) Esri Technical Support stated "since there is already a workflow to reach our end goal (able to sum one field) we don't think the enhancement will go far." I'm hoping that others out there would also like this ability so this gets some traction with the Survey123 development team.
... View more
11-05-2019
09:36 AM
|
8
|
6
|
5113
|
|
BLOG
|
For anyone interested in tracking this issue, it has been logged as BUG-000126498.
... View more
11-05-2019
04:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
48671
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi Ismael Chivite, Is it possible to export attachments other than photos into a report template? I realize that within a webform this is what users see - - explicit instructions to choose an image file. However, they are still able to select other types of files as long as they are below 10MB, and some users want to select PDFs. Should users be able to attach files like a PDF? Should I just tell my users to only use image files? As a related issue, it also seems as if non-image files (a PDF in this case) also cause edit mode of the webform to fail. If the edits were made and the PDF was removed, edit mode works as expected. Is this failure with an attached PDF expected behavior? Thank you! Erica
... View more
10-31-2019
08:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
33733
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi James, This is encouraging. Do you have any sort of timeline for when this will be corrected? I will also submit a ticket to lodge an official bug. Best, Erica
... View more
10-23-2019
02:15 PM
|
0
|
0
|
48671
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi James, The calculation for the point is: concat(substr(${Building_Name},0,10)," ",substr(${Building_Name},-10)) The survey is set up so that this point calculation takes affect if the answer to a previous question is met, and a location is selected from a select_one list. If the answer is not met, then the user can select a unique location on the list. It is the unique locations that are not carried through when editing the survey via edit mode. I've added the portion of my XLS below where you can see this. Thanks, Erica type name label hint constraint constraint_message required required_message appearance default readonly relevant calculation select_one request_type Request_Type Request Type yes minimal compact select_one yesno Work_at_Building Is work to be completed located at a building? yes likert select_one building_name Building_Name Building Name <i>Select the building's name from the list.</i> horizontal-compact ${Work_at_Building} = 'Yes' geopoint Work_Location Work Location <i>Select the location at which work needs to be completed.</i> yes concat(substr(${Building_Name},0,10)," ",substr(${Building_Name},-10))
... View more
10-17-2019
04:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
48671
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi, I'm using the Operations Dashboard instructions and generally, the editing works great. One issue I've noticed is that the geopoint is not carried through from the original survey into the "edit mode" survey. This only happens when the geopoint is selected by the person completing the survey. For context - We have a question "is work to be completed located at a building?" If the person answers 'yes', they pick a building from the list that appears, and the geopoint is populated with X/Y based on their selection. This works great in "edit mode". When they answer that question 'no', they get to enter their own geopoint. This is what does not get preserved in "edit mode". Is this expected? Is there a way we can get around this? We don't want to loose the location, just to update a few fields within the survey. Thanks, Erica
... View more
10-10-2019
09:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
48671
|
|
POST
|
Hi Owen, Is it possible for me to send you the URL to our Story directly, to avoid posting it here? Thanks, Erica
... View more
10-09-2019
04:33 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1212
|
|
POST
|
Hi, I have a webmap embedded in a sidecar within my StoryMap. One of the layers within this map is experiencing some mysterious issues. For some reason, only one of the polygon features (out of two) is showing - the other is not visible. This layer displays properly within the web map (when viewed within the web map viewer) and in any other application. I double checked the filters, visibility range, transparency, and the hosted feature layer itself and there are no issues. I also created "Story Map Basic" with this web map and my features show up fine. We also tried adding this web map outside of the sidecar and the same issue was present. Are there any known issues with layer settings not being honored within StoryMaps? Other than transparency issues, which I did find a post about. Thanks, Erica
... View more
10-08-2019
10:55 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1344
|
|
BLOG
|
Hi Reed, I did not post an Idea, however I did log an official enhancement request through technical support. The enhancement request is - ENH-000125836. Best, Erica
... View more
10-08-2019
08:59 AM
|
3
|
0
|
61076
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-06-2022 09:14 AM | |
| 6 | 10-24-2024 12:04 PM | |
| 1 | 04-28-2021 09:14 AM | |
| 3 | 09-06-2022 11:53 AM | |
| 1 | 01-17-2024 05:18 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
02-14-2025
01:16 PM
|