Latest Contributions by erica_poisson

For those of us using Collector as a means for inspecting assets, it would be VERY nice to be able to view related information in a pop-up window, as in many cases each related record has a photo attachment representing the status of the asset at that visit. ... View more

Hi James, Is this an enhancement that is currently being considered for Workforce sometime down the road? If you are at the UC, I'd love to come find you to explain my use case to you. Thanks, Erica ... View more

It would be nice if the Survey123 custom URL scheme was honored in the "Workers" web map so that attributes from a feature layer (generated from a GeoForm), could be passed into the Survey that is integrated with Workforce. It would provide a significant time savings. ... View more

Is there any plan to integrate the Survey123 custom URL scheme within Workforce? While the current method of launching Survey123 from Workforce is nice, it would be even better if relevant attribute information from the feature layer (generated from a GeoForm) in my "Workers" map could launch a survey with some pre-populated fields. This would take advantage of existing information in the FL and help to reduce the number of fields a worker has to complete in the field. ... View more

Craig Gillgrass‌ Jimmy Bernatchez‌ has there been any update on this? I also have a use case where I'd love to have this functionality available. It would be really great for streamlining my workflow and utilizing already capture information. Thanks, Erica ... View more

Hi Jayson, This is a great blog post. Do you think you'll be posting information on the third customization (automatically submitting surveys) at some point? Thanks! Erica ... View more

The file is published as one layer, with ~14,000 points (well under the 50,000 limit). I can share the web map/layer. You can access the map here. You should notice the areas where clustering hasn't translated from individual points (left) to clustering (right). I'm curious why this large swatch has been omitted. ... View more

Hi Maria, I'm also having this same problem with some of my data. I've had no luck figuring it out so I've put in a Service Desk ticket. Have you had any luck? If not, I can post when I figure it out. Erica ... View more

This has just started occurring with one of our report templates. It was working fine about 10 minutes ago, and now we're getting this error. Has any progress been made as to what the cause of this is? ... View more

Has it been decided if this is an enhancement that is slated to be incorporated into an upcoming release/update? ... View more

Can cascading selects be used with select_multiple questions? For instance, I have one select multiple question, that I want to influence choices for a second select multiple question. See attached XLS form screen capture for example. ... View more

That's essentially what I ended up doing, and it worked fine. ... View more

I've edited via JSON before, but it makes me a bit nervous. I just exported my data to a FGDB, and the newly added domain was there in the download...it just refuses to show up in the Web Map/Collector. ... View more

Huh...interesting to know. How long of a lag have you generally noticed? I'd say it's been about 30-45 minutes, and things are still not acting as I'd hope. I'm about to give up and use ArcMap to just overwrite the service with my changes since I know that is reliable. ... View more

Have you ever experienced issues where this tool would update the domain in ArcPro, but then not translate over to AGOL? I'm experiencing something strange, where I've run the solution to modify a domain, it appears properly in ArcPro, and then when I go into AGOL, I can see the option to add (via "Edit" in Web Map) one of these new domain type features, but the new domains will not appear from the pick-list if I edit an existing feature in the attribute table. Also, when viewed via Collector, the option to add these new feature types are not appearing. I've run the solution to modify a different domain in the same layer, and that worked fine. Could it be because I not only modified, but added new domain values? Am I missing some step? I'd assumed this was seamless - run the solution and see the results immediately online. ... View more