|
POST
|
Steven, Check out the Find Dangles check in Topology Checks. Since you can enter a tolerance, this check is ideal for street data, which has valid dangles like dead ends and cul-de-sacs. Only requirement is that your road data needs to participate in a database topology. Note that depending on how many features you have in the roads feature class and others that may participate in the topology will affect the performance and you may have to validate the data systematically, area by area. Something to look forward to for 10.2.2, we are improving the Find Dangles check with better performance and removing the requirement to have database topology. Cheers, michellej.
... View more
01-21-2014
11:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2477
|
|
POST
|
Colin, just wanted to let you know that this fix has just been made for 10.2.2. Regards, michellej.
... View more
01-15-2014
03:08 PM
|
0
|
0
|
239
|
|
POST
|
Ashley, The most likely reason that you would get the message "Unable to save error geometry... Saving feature geometry" is that the check was expecting one type of geometry but was returned something different. For example, if you are looking for intersecting lines using the geometry on geomtry check, the expected return geometry is line. But it will only get a line if the lines overlap. If the lines cross, then a point geometry would be returned and therefore, return the message unable to save error geometry. When looking for intersecting lines, it expects a line error. When looking for intersecting polygons, it expects a poly error. So when an error geometry is something other than what it is expecting, you will get that error message. (BTW, we have addressed that for 10.2.1. When looking for any type of intersections, it will always return points. So you should not get that message in those situations.) You should still have a record of the error in the Reviewer table, but you won't have the exact error geometry. It's a warning message (not an error message), so the validation ran successfully. Is the data you validated in the file geodatabase the exact same as the data in SDE? If it was the same check you were running, but different set of data, that could be the reason you did not get that message. Regards, michellej.
... View more
12-11-2013
12:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
915
|
|
POST
|
Hi Colin. I have been able to verify this issue is a bug with the Browse Features dialog. I was also able to reproduce it on a newer version. (The other bug that I was referring to was with running batch jobs with an image service in ArcMap - not the Browse Features dialog.) So, either you can contact Tech support to create a bug with a NIM that you can follow. Or I can create a bug internally, but you will not have access to follow the status of that bug. If it's critical for you, I would suggest going through Tech Support. Let me know so I know whether to log the bug internally or not. The workaround at this time is to remove the image service. Regards, michellej.
... View more
12-09-2013
12:19 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1533
|
|
POST
|
This is very interesting. It looks like you have Mapping and Charting and not just Data Reviewer installed. Build 1488 is Service Pack 1 Patch 1. And the image service fix should be in there. Can you provide more detailed information regarding your workflow? What selected features are you browsing? Is this from a data check or from a map selection? Are the features from a feature class?
... View more
12-09-2013
09:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1533
|
|
POST
|
The build number you provided was not a Data Reviewer build number but rather the ArcGIS build. To find the Data Reviewer build, go to Customize > Extensions. Click on Data Reviewer and in the Description it will show the version and build number. I can determine what service pack and patch is installed based on the build number. I did find that Data Reviewer made a fix regarding having image services in ArcMap in 10.1 patch 1, which is DR build number 1246. However, I would suggest installing Service Pack 1 for ArcGIS and Data Reviewer. Also, latest patch for Data Reviewer service pack 1.
... View more
12-09-2013
07:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1533
|
|
POST
|
What Data Reviewer version, service pack, patch are you on?
... View more
12-06-2013
01:53 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1533
|
|
POST
|
Sounds like you are using ArcGIS Workflow manager. In your step when launching an ArcMap document, have you considered using a document that has been customized? Check out the following help topic, Fundamentals of saving your customizations. You can hide the versioning toolbar (but not sure if that would prevent them from adding it manually).
... View more
11-21-2013
10:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
494
|
|
POST
|
If you have ROW records in the Reviewer table, then you may want to export those to Excel so you can send to the other user. ROW records will not have an error geometry associated to it, therefore, would not get rendered when symbolizing the Reviewer feature records. You add a definition query in the Reviewer Table properties to just show the ROW records (ReviewerCategory = 0) and then use the Export Grid to Excel tool in the Options button.
... View more
11-19-2013
07:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
649
|
|
POST
|
There's a button on the Reviewer Table to "Symbolize Reviewer Feature Records". That will add the point, line, and poly feature classes to ArcMap and the records will be joined with RevTableMain so all attributes will be seen.
... View more
11-14-2013
09:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
649
|
|
POST
|
Hello. There was an issue with those features and the check could not validate them. So there would be no record in the Reviewer table for them. Without looking at those features myself, I could not say for sure. I have forwarded the message to a Data Reviewer developer to see what they have to say. In the meantime, you could inspect those features in ArcMap by selecting them by their OID, which is the number reported in the message.
... View more
11-01-2013
08:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1137
|
|
POST
|
Hello, Have you actually looked at those features? Do they have multi-parts or are there holes in them or both?
... View more
10-30-2013
12:30 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1137
|
|
POST
|
Hi timdine. I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to find. If it's FacilityIDs in your origin table that is not in your destination table, you would have to configure the table to table attribute check to find where the FacilityIDs are equal in the Compare Attributes dialog. And then turn on the "Not-find rows that do not match" option to find the records that do not have a match. Sounds like you may be working with a electric dataset. What are the features you are trying to validate?
... View more
10-01-2013
08:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
549
|
|
POST
|
Use | as the OR. For example, TR 12345-1 OR TR 12345 OR TR 1234 ([A-Z][A-Z] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]\-[0-9])|([A-Z][A-Z] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])|([A-Z][A-Z] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]) MB 000/000 SD OR MB 000/000 ([A-Z][A-Z] [0-9][0-9][0-9]\/[0-9][0-9][0-9] [A-Z][A-Z])|([A-Z][A-Z] [0-9][0-9][0-9]\/[0-9][0-9][0-9]) Cheers, michellej.
... View more
08-28-2013
09:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
895
|
|
POST
|
In regards to the first question, Batch Validate auto-resources the batch job when you open it. Therefore when you validate all, you may not see any configuration errors. Batch Job Manager does not automatically resources the batch job you open. (You would have to do that thru the Workspace button.) Therefore if your batch job is pointing to a data path that you don't have on your computer, then you would have validation errors. For the domain check, did you double check that the data being validated was the exact same resource (version)?
... View more
08-26-2013
01:52 PM
|
0
|
0
|
459
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12-15-2020 08:53 PM | |
| 1 | 07-09-2015 01:32 PM | |
| 1 | 10-13-2015 06:02 PM | |
| 1 | 07-21-2014 03:11 PM | |
| 1 | 12-29-2016 04:06 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
08-11-2025
07:51 AM
|