Latest Contributions by Marc_Graham

Yes that is good practice. ... View more

Does this diagram help explain? You need internal and external web adaptors.  These all need to be registered with portal and server using their machine names to allow multiple web adaptors.  You then set the webcontexturls in portal and server to the proper url. https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/web-adaptor/latest/install/iis/configure-multiple-arcgis-web-adaptors.htm       ... View more

ALL Widgets in Experience Builder that are able to access layers should be able to access multiple layers. Even better would be the ability to access multiple layers across multiple maps, with the available layers being filtered by whatever map is being interacted with. ... View more

it doesn't appear to be documented anywhere except for in relation to webhooks: https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/events/conferences/2020/federal-gis/administering-arcgis-enterprise.pdf https://developers.arcgis.com/rest/users-groups-and-items/create-webhooks.htm ... View more

EDIT: Oh I see that is a slightly different endpoint in the documentation. I still confirmed it is there at 10.7 in our old portal:   It should be there - according to the docs it was introduced at 10.7: https://developers.arcgis.com/rest/users-groups-and-items/user-license-types.htm I can confirm that on our deprecated 10.7 portal it is there.   ... View more

Hi Gareth, I have created a workflow in FME that allows users to "check out" or "return" a license without having to ask an administrator.  The workflow requires us to update the role and the license type in two steps. there are two options - if the user checks out a license I set their named user to fieldWorkerUT and the corresponding custom role and if the user returns a license I set them to viewerUT and the corresponding custom viewer role. First update License Type: Request URL: $(arcgis_portal_url)/$(arcgis_portal_webadaptor_context)/sharing/rest/portals/0123456789ABCDEF/updateUserLicenseType Method: POST Parameters: token: token users: $(portal_username) f: pjson userLicenseType: $(new_user_type) new_user_type = fieldWorkerUT or viewerUT Second update User Role: URL: $(arcgis_portal_url)/$(arcgis_portal_webadaptor_context)/sharing/rest/portals/0123456789ABCDEF/updateUserRole Method: POST Parameters: token: token users: $(portal_username) f: pjson role: $(new_role) new_role = 7Wqt2kdDEMSska9w or 3Fg8KwpdZknhNZE6 depending upon which one matches the license type that was selected first.   I hope this helps, Marc ... View more

Hi @Andrew--Johnson, Thanks for the update. I'm glad this is getting some attention internally.   The only reservation I have about using integrated mesh as part of the ground layer is would this result in the texture being lost?   For example we might have aerial imagery and a DEM of a building site and have multiple mesh models  from Drone photogrammetry in place on the site.  I would not want to have the mesh textures replaced but the aerial images. Thanks again for taking the time to look into this.  Marc ... View more

Ah I see that each user at this URL: https://dnsname.com/portal/sharing/rest/community/users/username?f=pjson has an attribute: "provider": "oidc_Ej271aNSub40Wb9Q", which you can query. ... View more

I am having the same issue. I went throught he Sharing API and tried there using this URL: https://dnsname.com/portal/sharing/rest/portals/0123456789ABCDEF/oidc/Ej271aNSub40Wb9Q/unregister and got the following error:  Unable to unregister OpenID Connect provider as there are still user(s) from this provider. Error: 400 Question: How can I find out which users are linked to this provider? Thanks, Marc ... View more

Apologies, I guess it's the whole ecosystem right? The interaction between the tile layers and mesh layers appears to be consistent across ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Enterprise/Online.  I'll create a new idea for ArcGIS Pro if you prefer and cross-reference to this one. ... View more

Hi there, I just loaded a slpk into ArcGIS Pro 3.1 and I see that no progress has been made on this issue.  The mesh layers are still showing when they should be hidden behind draped tile layers.  This makes the whole 3D visualisation look like trash, and also makes it hard for the user to interpret the relationship between different layers. I have highlighted areas of the mesh that should be obscured by the basemap but aren't. @Andrew--Johnson in your recent what's new with scene layers post you asked for ideas for future releases - This is my idea from nearly two years ago that needs to be implemented asap.   Cheers, Marc     ... View more

Thanks so much for updating this thread with what you found. 😀 ... View more

hi there @MichailMarinakis1 , did you manage to sort this out? We have done everything you have except for updating the couchdb specific certificate and are getting the same 001887 error. ... View more

Hi, Are there any plans to support email integration with Office 365 through modern auth. Our administrators have disabled smtp basic authentication and will not turn it back on.  ... View more