|
POST
|
Yes. In this case, the problem parcel is the one next to the parcel with the long easement. It is about 3/4 of an acre too large. That is where discrepancy comes in. I think my main area of confusion is how to handle all of the lines and points. When I disable topology and move the parcel, the lines and points naturally stay where they are. Is the intended workflow to have to manually move each line and point as well? On some larger parcels this could result in quite a few manual movements. I figured that there has to be a way to avoid doing that.
... View more
10-13-2022
12:33 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1709
|
|
POST
|
I think the core of my problem comes around the confusion on what to do with the lines and point layers in this scenario. I did as you suggested and cut off the topology, and that works. It allows me to move the parcel without adjusting it's shape, but I'm left with all of the original lines and points in the original position. Is the best practice to move each one of those individually? In some cases that could be dozens of lines and points, so I'm thinking I must be missing a step. Is there a way to have the lines and points regenerated after moving the parcel?
... View more
10-13-2022
12:28 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1890
|
|
POST
|
I've tried alignment as well. It snaps the lines together but also doesn't shift the rest of the parcel. I need to move the parcel and all of its linework without modifying it's shape at all.
... View more
10-13-2022
12:12 PM
|
0
|
5
|
1906
|
|
POST
|
I have tried the tranform parcels tool. When I do that, it shifts the polygon but not the lines and points. So I'm left with a confusing mass of lines that I'm not really sure what to do with. Moreover, when I "Build" the lines for the parcel in its new position, it doesn't do anything. I would think it would have created new lines and points for the new western boundary, but it doesn't appear to. Edit: I should also have clarified. I am using the fabric in ArcGIS Pro. Not ArcMap.
... View more
10-13-2022
12:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1925
|
|
POST
|
I have looked everywhere and can't find what I am looking for, most likely because I'm not searching the right terms. I just migrated the parcel fabric this week, so I am still figuring out how the best practices. Here is my problem. I received a resurvey of 3 existing parcels that had outdated linework. Nothing was changing as far as adding or merging parcels. Just needed to update the linework to better reflect reality. I shrank the parcels to seeds and deleted the interior lines. I then sketched in the new parcels. The new boundary overlaps an existing parcel. The problem is that that parcel is correct in terms of it's acreage. It just needs to be shifted westward. Here is a screenshot attempting to illustrate the issue. I need to shift that parcel westward while preserving the same area, most importantly, the little cutout for the driveway. What is the best way to accomplish this?
... View more
10-13-2022
11:34 AM
|
2
|
19
|
3691
|
|
POST
|
Thank you for the response. This is very helpful! For the most part, the layers are fairly unrelated other than the fact that they are all requested public layers. If you don't mind me asking, how do you share yours out? The Kendall County GIS hub is pretty much exactly what I am going for, so I imagine your setup would work well for us. Do you just have a script for truncate/append set up for a regular basis on certain layers? The only layers we have the change with any degree of frequency is our zoning, parcels, centerlines, and point addresses. I will look into the truncate/append process. I am an amateur at best when it comes to python, so it will take me some time. Is this script similar to your setup?
... View more
10-11-2022
05:24 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1414
|
|
POST
|
To follow up on this, ESRI has logged it as a bug. (#BUG-000152548 if you want to track it). They have given no eta on getting it fixed. Hopefully next patch, I suppose. The ??? issue was resolved for me in patch 3.02, however.
... View more
10-07-2022
12:17 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1720
|
|
POST
|
We are looking to deploy an Open Data Hub initiative in ArcGIS online. I want to have all of our publicly shareable layers readily available for the public to download. We have quite a few layers, so manually keeping the data up to date would have been a huge headache. I have about 30 feature classes that I am looking to publish and keep updated on a weekly basis. To get ahead of this issue, I have used this excellent post (Thanks @JonahLay!) to customize a python script that will publish and overwrite the layers from an input arcgis pro project to an AGOL service on a weekly basis. When publishing services to AGOL, are there any best practices regarding publishing multiple feature classes in one service versus publishing them as single feature class services? I have worked with ArcGIS Online data for a long time but have never seen a concrete answer for this. Would you run into bottlenecks by publishing too many feature classes in one service? If so, is there a rule of thumb for how many? Is one way more "efficient" in terms of credit consumption? I know whatever we publish is going to consume credits, which is fine. Just not sure if one method is more efficient than another. Would appreciate any insight that you can provide. Thank you!
... View more
10-07-2022
11:34 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1632
|
|
IDEA
|
@MarkMansell1 Mark, To answer your question, yes, it should be able to be run as a standalone script. That being said, even if you schedule it using arcgis Pro's GP scheduler, it should still function, even with arcGIS Pro closed. All the Geoprocessing scheduler does is add an entry into Windows task scheduler for you with the correct settings. I've gotten this working on several scripts, so feel free to reach out to me if you have other questions!
... View more
09-28-2022
06:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2161
|
|
IDEA
|
It would be very helpful to have a geoprocessing tool for publishing and overwriting services in portal and arcgis online. It is possible to manually create one using this method, however not everyone has the time or knowledge necessary to make it up. This would be a helpful solution to esri's no/low code options. It would allow users to quickly automate the update of online data using modelbuilder.
... View more
09-28-2022
06:32 AM
|
1
|
2
|
892
|
|
POST
|
YES! I am so glad you replied. I was going crazy thinking that I was the only one having this issue. I also just tried to export the traverse as well and also got the ??? issue. I have a support call with ESRI this afternoon to work on this issue, so if I find anything, I will be sure to let you know.
... View more
09-21-2022
11:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1762
|
|
POST
|
@ThomasHervey1 I am having this issue again with a freshly created hub initiative. It isn't finding any of our organization's data layers. Edit: For those that were still having this issue like I was, the fix is to go into the Share settings of the Hub site (the small icon of two people next to the save button at the time of writing this) and ensuring that the Groups that were created when you deployed the initiative are listed under the "Group Sharing" buttons. You then need to share those layers with the group from that layers details page. Once I did that, it started showing up for me. @Gewobari @MarcCarullo @meganfraser @jp503 Maybe I just haven't found it, but some documentation on deploying this and setting it up would be very helpful. I have seen no mention of needing to add any data to groups and judging by this thread, many others haven't either. Considering the cost of Hub Premium, the deployment process should have much more documentation and resources available.
... View more
09-20-2022
11:56 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1711
|
|
POST
|
Yeah, it would be possible. I just liked the idea of having an editing and production environment separate from each other. So is replication not practical for this? I can write scripts for automating most of the admin tasks if necessary. Just trying to figure out if replication is a feasible solution.
... View more
09-20-2022
11:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
836
|
|
POST
|
Did you ever figure this out? I am having this same issue now.
... View more
09-20-2022
11:48 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1414
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 5 | a month ago | |
| 1 | 10-02-2024 07:04 AM | |
| 1 | 05-23-2024 02:54 PM | |
| 1 | 07-29-2025 01:09 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|