Latest Contributions by MikeMillerGIS

I would advise against calling First and then looping over the featureset.  That could cause you to miss the first feature.  Try this   // Attribute Rule for Deleting Split objects // Arcade Version 1.29 // Rule Version: 1.0.1 Separated Merge and Split Scripts // 11/26/2025 // RUN PARAMETERS // Triggers : Update // Trigger Fields : Shape // Exclude From application evaluation: True var splitLayerName = 'RCL_SPLIT'; var rclSplit = FeatureSetByName($datastore, '<RCL_SPLIT_GUID>',['*'], false); var deleteArray = []; for (var feat in rclSplit){ Push(deleteArray,{ 'globalID': feat.globalID }); } if (IsEmpty(deleteArray)){ return; } Console('Split: Deleting ' + Count(deleteArray) + ' Features: ' + deleteArray); var result = { 'edit': [{ 'className': splitLayerName, 'deletes': deleteArray }] }; Console(result); return result; ... View more

The asset package does convert the GlobalID field to a Guid and disable editor tracking.  You might want to delete the GlobalID field(type GUID) and re-add it.  Also enable editor tracking. ... View more

Attribute Rules can only access tables in their own database.  But there is a trick - https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/creating-attribute-rules-to-access-feature-classes-in-a-000032146 ... View more

Can you recreate the rule using the new templated AR and see if that changes anything? ... View more

Take a look at the templated rule - Generate ID.  It has a option "Sequence by lookup" that could use an unique seq for grid.  The templated rule writes the arcade, which you could modify to also get an ID field from the intersected layer. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/generate-id-attribute-rule.htm#LI_A9FBB4CFF1C5407D9F9A092ABDF2FC3A ... View more

Phase Change or the Network Attribute configured for phase propagation should only ever be set at locations where phase changes or deviates.  This allows the system to calculate the downstream phase without the editor have to make downstream edits.   ... View more

BTW, if you want that valve in the results, you can use a Find Connected Trace instead of the Isolation Trace. ... View more

Ok, that picture helps.  That valve is isolated by closing the other valves.  So to isolate that area, that valve going into the cul-de-sac does not need to be closed.  Now field operations, might choose to close that value, so the pipe is not drained and then does not have to be disinfected.  But that valve is not required to be closed to isolate the area. ... View more

What do the results look like if you return all isolated features? ... View more

Hmm.  Well it could be two things A: Using Phases Normal instead of Phase Change could be setting the phases energize.  I do not think it is this though.  That should only be set if the propagator can reach the asset, which it appears it cannot since the subnetwork trace stops B: Since the value was set and now the propagator cannot reach it, it does not know it has to reset it.   ... View more

If you do a subnetwork trace, does it select that downstream line?  If you place a barrier pass that line?  We need to find if there is a loop somewhere. ... View more

What is the other unit?  Do both units have a phase change set?  If the other unit does not and not open, that is allowing the phase to push through.   ... View more

are you modeling units in that switch?  Are the units open? ... View more