Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About MikeMillerGIS
MikeMillerGIS
Esri Frequent Contributor
since
07-04-2014
Tuesday
2302
Posts created
22
Kudos given
328
Solutions
714
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(0 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by MikeMillerGIS
|
POST
|
That device is the barrier, so one side is techincally energized, so it gets the phases energized field. Even if you turn off "Include Barriers" in the subnetwork definition, since it has a multi terminal configuration, it will still get the energized value. The features downstream are reporting De-Energized, correct?
... View more
11-10-2025
08:36 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1422
|
|
POST
|
I would need the source and target database in a fgdb. Do not need the Geometric network. Also the data mapping spreadsheet.
... View more
10-29-2025
09:12 AM
|
0
|
1
|
883
|
|
POST
|
If you can package up a repo case(schema only), I can look a look. Reviewing the source, it has something to do with the source to target mapping and subtypes. It should be looking at the subtype name. Do you have subtypes who description is a number?
... View more
10-29-2025
07:36 AM
|
0
|
3
|
917
|
|
POST
|
I believe those are the only fields added. They can be deleted as they are only there to provide a link back to the source data.
... View more
10-24-2025
10:04 AM
|
1
|
0
|
480
|
|
POST
|
You should focus on subtypes, removing them, will remove the asset types(domain codes) and all related UN properties. So set all items in the subtype section that you do not want to Always Remove
... View more
10-15-2025
02:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1109
|
|
POST
|
According to the sql, which is NOT (AssetGroup = 18 AND AssetType IN (0,301,302,305,306,309,310,311)), the config table is removing that item.
... View more
10-15-2025
09:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1128
|
|
POST
|
With a config table, it applies a sql query to exclude asset groups and types that are no longer valid in the target. If you run that query against your asset package(select by attribute), do you get any records? Also, you will see much faster times running locally. Running with source and result on a network share drastically slows down performance.
... View more
10-15-2025
09:18 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1136
|
|
POST
|
In the AP Workspace folder, can you share the log file? When you say delete, the data or schema?
... View more
10-15-2025
05:19 AM
|
0
|
6
|
1154
|
|
POST
|
I would run Asset Package To Geodatabase(File or Mobile gdb) and then the Error Analysis Tools(https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/utility-networks/analyze-network-data.htm)
... View more
10-09-2025
05:29 PM
|
1
|
0
|
436
|
|
IDEA
|
I believe this behavior is based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DE-9IM
... View more
10-08-2025
02:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1011
|
|
POST
|
The standalone atbx will not be upgraded to 3.5 and only works in 3.3. The tools are part of ArcGIS Pro in 3.5. If you have the old toolbox in your project, you need to delete it. Pro could load this first, and when you try to use the 3.5 version, it will try to use the 3.3 version since it detected it first. That is why you are getting that errors. When upgrading to 3.5, make sure to delete the stand alone migration atbx.
... View more
10-08-2025
02:12 AM
|
3
|
1
|
682
|
|
POST
|
Yes, that is the reason. Couple issues we have seen with them in the UN - Visualization: Many times, we want to see abandon assets separately. This has lead to duplicating the UN layers with def queries to remove/show abandon features. This is not a good practice and can cause issues with the UN tools. - Errors: abandoned features in the UN can still generate errors. - Offset/Snapping: the abandoned features still participate in the topo. So if you replace a pipe, but want to keep the old pipe, you need to move its Z so it does not conflict with the new pipe.
... View more
10-06-2025
04:30 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1161
|
|
POST
|
The pipe connection and/or manhole channel that the rule is creating requires a value for active volume. So you can either make the field nullable(and adjust the network attribute), or adjust the rule to include a value in the return edits. We could also define a default value on those subtypes in the data model. That might be the easier fix.
... View more
10-03-2025
09:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
612
|
|
POST
|
We prototyped an Attribute Rule that would move copy/move features to an abandon layer. You can try it out and see if it meets your needs. There is a GP tool in this toolbox to set up the attribute rules. https://esri.github.io/arcade-expressions/docs/3.3/AbandonRows.html https://github.com/Esri/arcade-expressions/tree/master/attribute-rules/attribute_assistant
... View more
10-01-2025
04:24 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1261
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 2 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 4 weeks ago |
Activity Feed
- Posted Re: Update Subnetwork not updating Isconnected and Subnetwork Name on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. yesterday
- Got a Kudo for Re: Update Subnetwork not updating Isconnected and Subnetwork Name. Tuesday
- Posted Re: Update Subnetwork not updating Isconnected and Subnetwork Name on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Tuesday
- Posted Re: Update Subnetwork not updating Isconnected and Subnetwork Name on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Tuesday
- Posted Re: Create Street Name Validation on Attribute Rules Questions. Thursday
- Posted Re: Create Street Name Validation on Attribute Rules Questions. Thursday
- Posted Re: Create Street Name Validation on Attribute Rules Questions. Thursday
- Posted Re: Create Street Name Validation on Attribute Rules Questions. a week ago
- Posted Re: Create Street Name Validation on Attribute Rules Questions. a week ago
- Posted Re: Create Street Name Validation on Attribute Rules Questions. a week ago
- Got a Kudo for Re: Utility Network – Why is “Station” modeled as a Device instead of an Assembly?. a week ago
- Got a Kudo for Re: Utility Network – Why is “Station” modeled as a Device instead of an Assembly?. a week ago
- Got a Kudo for Re: Junction-Junction Associations require to_terminal. a week ago
- Posted Re: Junction-Junction Associations require to_terminal on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. a week ago
- Posted Re: Utility Network – Why is “Station” modeled as a Device instead of an Assembly? on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. a week ago
- Got a Kudo for Re: Dirty Area: The geometry for the network feature is empty.. a week ago
- Posted Re: Please suggest the Data dictionary path for Telecom domain Network (TDN) on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. a week ago
- Posted Re: Create Migration Workspace - The domain was not found on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 2 weeks ago
- Posted Re: Tracing issue when tracing across tier with an added a filter barrier - Exterprise 11.5 on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 3 weeks ago
- Posted Re: Water Utility Profile Tool on Water Utilities Questions. 3 weeks ago
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Tuesday
|