|
POST
|
They are all the same reference; this has been verified in all the rest endpoints 102100 (3857). If I swap back to 3.17 there is no issue; so this is something that changed at 3.18 that is affecting it.
... View more
09-27-2016
09:28 AM
|
2
|
2
|
3615
|
|
POST
|
With the update to reference 3.18 we are now finding that we get this message returned: esri.dijit.BasemapGallery: Unable to switch basemap because new basemap has a different spatial reference. Yet if we select our Basemap toggle we can switch without issue; the problem only happens on the initial load of the page.
... View more
09-23-2016
04:08 PM
|
1
|
13
|
6524
|
|
POST
|
Shouldn't the USAddress.lot.xml from 10.4.1 be the most current?
... View more
07-28-2016
11:40 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1342
|
|
POST
|
I have a address I am working with; 323 N Fifth Ave, Sequim WA, 98382. Now I use both commercial and internally developed data that goes into a composite geocoder set in a hierarchy based on the quality of said sources; pretty standard stuff. So how can I get a result returned like this: Score: 100.0 Address: 323 NORTH ST, SEQUIM, WA, 98382 Loc_name: HERE_Points Score: 100 Match_addr: 323 NORTH ST, SEQUIM, WA, 98382 House: 323 Side: L PreDir: PreType: StreetName: NORTH SufType: ST SufDir: City: SEQUIM State: WA ZIP: 98382 Where the 'NORTH' as the street Name and 'ST' as SufType as swapped and the score of 100.0 is assigned. While further down the composite process I get this return as well: Score: 100.0 Address: 323 N 5TH AVE, SEQUIM, WA, 98382 Loc_name: HERE_Streets Score: 100 Match_addr: 323 N 5TH AVE, SEQUIM, WA, 98382 House: Side: L PreDir: N PreType: StreetName: 5TH SufType: AVE SufDir: City: SEQUIM State: WA ZIP: 98382 How can I get a 100.0 score for both of these results in my composite; where obviously the first one swapped the street elements pretty extremely. Maybe Bruce Harold , Agatha Wong or Brad Niemand can give me some insight; this is confusing us.
... View more
07-28-2016
10:34 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2097
|
|
POST
|
No, its not. You are not able to run multiple instances of ArcGIS Server on a single machine. A different option could be using different web-adapters; these can be configured in IIS for using Windows/AD security and then you can break down different AD groups to control access to services.
... View more
03-24-2016
05:29 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1192
|
|
POST
|
Take a look at the log file in the license server directory. What is it showing? I found that a recent patch from Microsoft invalidated my MachineID used in my license file. This took my service down.
... View more
03-23-2016
12:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
459
|
|
POST
|
This can all depend on the size of the data you are using; and the type of Geocoder you are building. If you are building one of the single-field types with a layer/feature with only a couple hundred rows than a couple minutes is expected; but if you are building a state-wide point layer using address elements then you could see 10-15 minutes easily.
... View more
03-15-2016
01:32 PM
|
1
|
0
|
909
|
|
POST
|
No. I am working in 10.3.1 and setting up my own basemaps using build caches, and wanting to add my reference layers similar to how ESRI does with the Light Gray Canvas basemaps.
... View more
03-04-2016
11:04 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1152
|
|
POST
|
I have and maintain several internal base maps we use across apps and we would to setup the services like we see in ESRI hosted services with the main BaseMap layer, but with one or more Reference layers/services. But I am not able to find where in Portal or ArcGIS Online I can set a item in my Contents to be a Reference layer. Suggestions?
... View more
03-04-2016
10:38 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2729
|
|
POST
|
No, there should not be a issue with that; again the key is making sure you have the paths in a similar structure for the MXD to DATA relationship; and that you have registered the data-sources properly with the server. I do this between 3 environments and have no issue promoting servers from DEV to TEST to PROD.
... View more
02-17-2016
10:05 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1028
|
|
POST
|
If your services use the same data-path structure; and you have the data folder/s or database connection/s setup in both environments using the same names; then you should be able to take the service from 1 and publish it to 2.
... View more
02-16-2016
03:46 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1028
|
|
POST
|
This is a question going out to the ESRI (Agatha & Bruce) folks; with 10.3+ you guys have gotten sub-units coming along fairly well. But have you looked at handling address prefix and suffix elements? Cases like this: 4525 1/2 S 280TH ST A652 N Placer Way SW 265B E 128th Street Unit 1 These are instances that are not with the USPS address format; or even the FGDC; but do reflect real-world locations across the US. They do not get handled the same way as the USPS putting them in sub-units since we have instances where these actual can be a split parcel with a sub-unit assigned as well.
... View more
01-07-2016
09:52 AM
|
0
|
5
|
7655
|
|
POST
|
Ok, so SQL was kicking the connection but because it was locking for a backup.
... View more
11-24-2015
12:03 PM
|
1
|
1
|
5070
|
|
POST
|
I have found this could be tied to another issue; one that results in a message like this: Underlying DBMS error [[Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0][SQL Server]The app domain with specified version id (99) was unloaded due to memory pressure and could not be found.] [<featurelayer name>] This is caused by a memory contention issue; where the SQL DB hosting machine does not have enough RAM between the running OS and the instance of SQLServer running; so when there is the contention; Microsoft fires the .Net GarbageCollection flushing the SQL Spatial Types libraries from memory and there by recycling the connections accessing them. Try looking deeper at your SQL Server logs for the time frame where you had that error logged to you and see what you see in the server side of the conneciton.
... View more
11-23-2015
08:42 AM
|
1
|
4
|
5070
|
|
POST
|
To me; its looks like you need to put in your code minimum requirements to process so you don't spend time trying to massage data that is already going to be highly inaccurate it not problematic. At the least a street address and jurisdiction name, or a address and postal-code; as you look at the various numbers of fields you can use then you can adjust according.
... View more
09-08-2015
04:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1482
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | a week ago | |
| 1 | 12-27-2025 04:14 PM | |
| 1 | 12-20-2025 03:55 PM | |
| 1 | 11-14-2025 01:27 PM | |
| 1 | 03-13-2025 05:24 PM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
an hour ago
|