POST
|
The value add depends on how much your organization can invest in creating (and maintaining) custom code to replace data quality workflows currently implemented using Data Reviewer’s configurable tools. Starting with the 2.3 release, Data Reviewer’s automated checks will be migrated to support Attribute rule constraint and validation workflows. Check migration will happen over a series of releases due to the number of checks to be migrated and are prioritized based on customer frequency of use. (Note: You can influence this prioritization by participating in our customer survey!) Here are some items to consider: Implementation and maintenance costs Implementation of a Data Reviewer-based Attribute rule does not require specialized programming skills and can often be done by a subject matter expert with a good understanding of the organization’s data quality requirements. This results in lower implementation and maintenance costs when compared to custom code. (Actually, there are whole host of things to consider when implementing a system based on customized commercial off-the-shelf software (COTS). For reference, here is an Esri white paper (slightly dated) that outlines patterns in COTS-based deployments.) Functional equivalency Does Arcade support the data validation requirements that are currently implement with Data Reviewer checks? Depending on the Data Reviewer checks that are used in your system this may not be an issue. Operational efficiency Support for Data Reviewer-based validation workflows is planned for the Q1 2020 release. In testing, Data Reviewer’s validation engine significantly outperforms equivalent Arcade-based validations. This improves operational efficiency that results in lower operating costs.
... View more
05-22-2019
12:15 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1291
|
POST
|
In ArcMap, you can use the Reviewer Batch Job Manager tool to duplicate checks. Here is a link to the help topic for reference: Duplicating checks in batch jobs—Help | ArcGIS Desktop
... View more
05-13-2019
09:11 AM
|
0
|
0
|
383
|
BLOG
|
Data Reviewer in ArcGIS Pro 2.3 delivers new capabilities for enhancing quality assurance when creating and editing data. One of the new quality assurance capabilities introduced at the ArcGIS Pro 2.3/ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7 release are Attribute rules. Attribute rules help to improve data quality by enabling you to automatically calculate a feature's attribute values (calculation attribute rules), reject edits which create "poor" quality data (constraint attribute rules) and identify existing features which are of "poor" quality (validation attribute rules). At the 2.3 release, many of Data Reviewer's automated checks can now be configured to validate features during editing. Watch the video below to learn more about this new capability.
... View more
03-29-2019
09:53 AM
|
2
|
0
|
637
|
POST
|
You may want to consider a couple of approaches to this requirement. If you would like to retain a history of errors that have already been fixed (to support management reporting, etc), then you may want to simply filter the list of errors presented to the user in your application. The JS ReviewerResults task supports the query of errors with an optional filter to exclude those errors you don’t want to display. This task also supports creation of a layer definition that can be applied to a map service to filter the error geometries displayed in the map. If you do not need to retain the fixed errors, then you could “move” fixed errors to a different session (using Managing Data Reviewer Records sample) and then delete the session (using Delete Reviewer Session GP tool). The temporary session can be created using the Create Reviewer Session GP tool. In either scenario, you may want to use the Managing Data Reviewer Records sample to move error exceptions to a separate Reviewer session to facilitate their management.
... View more
03-22-2019
02:43 PM
|
0
|
6
|
1317
|
POST
|
The Data Reviewer extension's Feature on Feature check supports validation of spatial relationships between features. This check can be implemented as an attribute (constraint) rule or a map-based validation rule. That said, it does not currently take Z into consideration for Z-enabled features (although you can implement a work-around if Z is stored as an attribute value).
... View more
01-30-2019
04:30 PM
|
1
|
0
|
755
|
POST
|
Have you installed 10.6.1 Update 1 for Data Reviewer for Server? If not, I would suggest installing the update and following the steps for re-registering the extension with Server.
... View more
11-12-2018
02:04 PM
|
1
|
1
|
486
|
POST
|
Thanks for sharing your example of how you are using the Non-Linear Segment check! Unfortunately, the ability to run Data Reviewer checks interactively is not currently available in ArcGIS Pro and not all checks have been migrated to the new authoring workflows (Reviewer Rules). That said, the Non-Linear Segment check can still be used to validate features in ArcGIS Pro using a Reviewer Batch Job (created in ArcMap) and then run in ArcGIS Pro using the Execute Reviewer Batch Job geoprocessing tool. Here are a couple of tutorials that document this workflow: Migration from ArcMap to ArcGIS Pro for data validation Validate address data using batch jobs Hope this helps!
... View more
08-27-2018
09:45 AM
|
2
|
1
|
1342
|
POST
|
Hey Julie, Here's the check UI in ArcGIS Pro... Better? Worse?!?! Thanks for the feedback!
... View more
08-23-2018
10:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
721
|
POST
|
Sounds like you are using a file geodatabase with your service. If so, the only operations that are supported are those which read from the workspace (such as dashboard and get results). You'll want to use an enterprise geodatabase for operations that create/write results. Here is a link to documentation that describes this limitation.
... View more
05-25-2018
01:12 PM
|
3
|
1
|
3207
|
POST
|
arxit20 wrote: Hi, Is it possible to parameter User rules (Grants and Privileges), with PostgreSQL SDE, to have users in Data Reviewer : - Administrator : all privileges - Editor : review, corrections, validations - Operator : only corrections (not review status nor validations) I use PostgreSQL 9.4 and ArcGIS Desktop 10.5.1. Thank you. Hi, I'm not clear on what aspects of data reviewer functionality you would like to restrict. Are you referring to the life cycle management of a result?
... View more
02-21-2018
03:26 PM
|
0
|
1
|
494
|
POST
|
travisjpeterson wrote: Hello. I have a desktop install of ArcGIS 10.4. I would like to run Data Reviewer, but I only have access to Data Reviewer 10.2. Can I run Data Reviewer 10.2 with a desktop installation of ArcGIS 10.2? Thanks. Hi, The version of Data Reviewer for Desktop needs to match the installed version of ArcGIS Desktop. Here is a link to the 10.4 installation guide for reference.
... View more
02-13-2018
09:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
618
|
POST
|
Hi, Reporting is not available in ArcGIS Pro (yet). There are plans to include these and other forms of reporting in future releases of ArcGIS Pro. Thanks Jay Cary yuvalrsystematics-co-il-esridist wrote: Hey there, I'm looking for an option that exists in ArcMap and was unable to find in ArcGIS Pro - Generating a report from the Reviewer results table. See attached screenshots. Thanks! Yuval
... View more
01-25-2018
09:48 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1118
|
POST
|
The automated reports are intended for use in quantifying errors on features and stand-alone tables. The metrics they report (primarily accuracy calculations) don't translate particularly well to metadata content. You can export the results to Excel (using the Export Grid to Excel tool) for reporting. Any thoughts on how you might calculate an accuracy rate on metadata content??
... View more
03-24-2017
10:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
478
|
POST
|
Sounds like you may need to start a Reviewer Session in order to persist your results in a geodatabase. Here is a link to the help topic which outlines how to start a session: http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/data-reviewer/starting-a-reviewer-session-in-a-nonenterprise-geodatabase.htm Once you have a session started, you will have the option to either interactively browse the results or write results to the Reviewer Table after running a check.
... View more
10-17-2016
02:06 PM
|
1
|
0
|
716
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-30-2024 09:26 AM | |
1 | 02-23-2024 02:34 PM | |
1 | 10-31-2023 08:59 AM | |
1 | 02-24-2023 03:04 PM | |
1 | 01-25-2023 10:58 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 hours ago
|