|
IDEA
|
It does give me al ist of fields, but when I select one, another blank line appears and I have to drop the list down again and pick the next field, and then again and again and again... No check boxes appear as in your picture (which is what I want).
... View more
05-24-2021
01:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5510
|
|
IDEA
|
Yep - still coming up with a table in a GDB. And that is straight through Pro (not in Model Builder).
... View more
05-24-2021
01:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5551
|
|
IDEA
|
Nope - I don't see that layout at all. (Yes - running 2.8)
... View more
05-24-2021
01:04 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5571
|
|
IDEA
|
So I'm in the process of creating a model in Model Builder and are using the Delete Fields tool. Currently, I need to select each field I want to delete one at a time by selecting from a drop down list and scrolling through all the available fields (and non-available fields - would be good if these were hidden too). It would be much more efficient if instead of having to select fields from a drop down list, one-by-one, all the fields were listed with blank check boxes, so I could rapidly check the ones I want to delete and hit OK (unavailable/system fields greyed out).
... View more
05-24-2021
12:13 AM
|
0
|
6
|
5603
|
|
IDEA
|
@NaicongLi Thats unfortunate to hear. Hopefully a solution can be found and it is put back in the Product Plan. Reading through the support ticket, at least for the majority of our users, I don't expect there to be too many issues as most people wouldn't be sharing the files their storing in OneDrive (it's mostly that personal folder and backup option).
... View more
05-23-2021
05:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2364
|
|
IDEA
|
Maybe a mesh system could potentially also be utilised for data transfer between offline devices (in a similar manner to the way these devices work)
... View more
05-12-2021
05:50 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2677
|
|
IDEA
|
@TrevorMillen no harm in creating a new idea (can always reference/link this one in your post) with your additional feature requests. Would likely help ESRI track these feature requests better if they decide to implement them.
... View more
05-04-2021
07:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2029
|
|
IDEA
|
This is definitely something that I wish we were able to do as well. It seems odd that Copy and Paste is enabled in one way for editable data, but then in a different way for non-editable data.
... View more
04-28-2021
06:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
5405
|
|
IDEA
|
I find many apps now allow you to let your mobile device remember your login details and instead use your biometric infomation (fingerprint/facial recognition/iris scan). This would be a useful feature for logging into Field Maps instead of having to retype your username and password everytime.
... View more
04-27-2021
12:00 AM
|
9
|
2
|
1582
|
|
IDEA
|
When logging into your ArcOnline account (and I assume Enterprise accounts have the same problem), a lot of users struggle to enter their Password correctly the first (second and third) time as it only shows the most recent leter you've pressed. Many login functions have a check-box to "Show Password" so you can review it in full before hitting submit. Whilst on a PC or larger device, typing is relatively easy, mobile devices can be more difficult, especially for less tech savvy users with "fat finger syndrome".
... View more
04-26-2021
11:54 PM
|
3
|
0
|
734
|
|
IDEA
|
This would be a handy feature (along with an always on display) for use in a vehicle when navigating.
... View more
04-26-2021
05:25 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2062
|
|
IDEA
|
Background: After using Collector Classic, Collector and now Field Maps for quite a while, of all the technical support requests we get in the GIS team from our Field Staff who are working with offline areas, the majority tend to be solved by removing an offline area that they have had on their device for an extended period of time and downloading a new offline area. Over time, small changes and tweaks to maps and feature services (and sometimes ever where no discernable changes have occured) can result in long-held offline areas no-longer matching the online environment 100%. Unfortunately, users don't become aware of this until they try and save a feature and instead get an "Unable to save" type error. This may occur in one layer, but not another layer. Despite myself and my colleagues telling people they need to regularly remove offline areas and start "fresh" with a new copy, especially if they haven't used an offline area in a while, it falls on deaf ears or just isn't thought about. My proposal: Include the option at an organisational level to include an expiry timeframe for offline areas. For example, I set in the org settings an offline time limit of 90 days. Any offline area taken will automatically expire and be removed after 90 days. Warnings could be "pushed" to users devices or email address (automatically) annoucing when an offline area is X days from expiring. Offline areas with features yet-to-be syncronised could be set (org level) to either sync automatically prior to expiry, prompt user to sync/discard and then the offline area expires, or discarded automatically upon expiry. Bonus Functionality: An org setting that enables the automatic background renewal of offline areas upon expiry (remove it and redownload using the same settings in the background) with the option to occur only when connected to Wi-Fi or Cellular data (are data caps really an issue anymore?). Upvote away people 😉
... View more
04-18-2021
06:42 PM
|
18
|
1
|
2186
|
|
IDEA
|
@LeviCecil I don't know about on iOS but on Android it would depend on the how the user has their device setup. You can allow apps to auto update but you may also have it set to require prompting by the user. It would be best to notify all users to do the update if it's important and provide a link or other options for guidance (I don't know about you, but not all our field users are overly tech-fluent).
... View more
04-18-2021
06:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3272
|
|
POST
|
Yep - I am having the same problem since upgrading when I save a project for the first time (i.e. start with blank template, add a map, add data and Save). Once saved, any further saves happen at a speed I would call "normal" (i.e. a couple/few seconds). I've been on with tech support and the current state of affairs is "waiting"...... I have a new laptop on the way (current one is dodge) and will see what happens when I get it. If it continues to be a problem with the clean install, I will reopen the tech support case. I'm using a different laptop at present and just did a test save and it still took 30 odd seconds to save (blank template - insert new map - add 2 simple layers - save) and that was after it threw an "Unspecified Error" as well. Definitely seems to be something not quite right with this version in my experience. A colleague had similar issues with a previous version of Pro (2.7.1) and the resolution (after discussing with ESRI support) was upgrading to 2.7.2 and now it works as expected. I was fine on 2.7.1 and now have issues with 2.7.2.
... View more
04-11-2021
08:04 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2271
|
|
POST
|
Hi Brains Trust. I'm working on a model and starting to delve deeper into parts I've not really used a lot before - especially not in combination. Here's the scenario. I have a feature class that contains a field called DateS which contains date stamps formatted like this: 2020-11-16T00:02:58.096Z I want to be able to iterate through all the different dates in that column (easy enough using Iterate Field Values), extract the Year and Month (I assume that will be Get Value) and then run a formula to calulate the Australian Financial Year (July - June) that the date range falls in. Example of some output values; Input from DateS - Output as Financial Year (YEAR-Y1) 2020-11-16T00:02:58.096Z - 2020-21 2020-06-16T00:02:58.096Z - 2019-20 2019-10-16T00:02:58.096Z - 2019-20 2019-03-16T00:02:58.096Z - 2018-19
... View more
04-11-2021
07:17 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2642
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Monday | |
| 3 | a week ago | |
| 2 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | 05-19-2026 05:02 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
9 hours ago
|