Latest Contributions by LindsayRaabe_FPCWA

‎10-14-2022

So seeming as how I've had no breakthroughs with my other question (Why isn't my model iterating for all features (2 iterators using sub models)) I thought I'd try another approach. Now I'm using the While Iterator to try and stop an iteration when a feature class contains X number of rows. It seems like there aren't many options. Just Inputs and Continue if True/False. I was hoping that if I put both inputs in, then when they matched, it would recognise it as True and stop. Apparently not the case. I'm guessing I need to include some sort of expression step that passes True/False to the iterator? How would this look?

‎10-13-2022

No ideas? Suggestions? I tried moving the steps in the 1st sub model preceding the iteration into the main model to reduce unnecessary processing. No discernable difference on my sample dataset (same results). I also tried using Collect Values on the iterator outputs to pass back to the main model, but I just ended up with 14 copies of the last point processed.

‎10-12-2022

Looking forward to seeing custom image symbols again, plus decent hatch symbol options!

‎10-11-2022

I have built a Model (with 2 sub-models) that is meant to follow the following logic for preparing data for use in Network Analysis route solving (Stops): - 2 input point feature classes (Origin points and Destination points) - For each Origin (i.e. A/B/C/D) and Destination (i.e. W/X/Y/Z) point combination, generate a Route Name (i.e. A_W, A_X, A_Y, A_Z). Each Origin point goes to many destinations and needs to be copied with the unique Route Name applied to each copy to match a destination point that gets the same Route Name applied. - Append all Origin and Destination points to an output feature class (Stops) The final table will have what was originally 4 Origins copied in 4 times each with the unique route name to each Destination, plus each destination point copied in 4 times to pair with each origin location (A_W, A_X, A_Y, A_Z, B_W, B_X, ..., D_Y, D_Z). Graphics below show the main model which has input parameters for selecting the Origin and Destination feature classes, then a sub-model which iterates through each Origin location, and that has within it another sub-model which iterates through each Destination location to achieve the required value creation and data copying. The issue I've found is that whilst the model works as expected for the first Origin point, generating unique Origin/Destination combinations for all destinations, it doesn't then continue on to do the same for the next Origin location (the point of the first sub-model/iterator), resulting in the output FC only having a portion of the data required. Sorry if this is very wordy, but couldn't figure out how to write it any more clearly. Ultimately, I'm trying to create the required data for generating multiple routes in one hit using Network Analyst.

‎10-05-2022

Is your script running on local feature classes or feature services in ArcGIS Online? I'd love to find a way to manage ArcGIS Online domains from centralised lists.

‎10-04-2022

Really handy and will do nicely until ESRI fix the Truncate function for feature services!

‎10-02-2022

@Mbizzy I have used that before, but still found it would time out after a a few thousand records and I'd have to hit refresh and submit the query again, repeatedly until all the records were gone.

‎09-15-2022

Pretty straight forward idea. I find that having favourites doesn't always work well, as it depends what the project I'm working on is, as to what tools I would consider "favourite". I also don't like having to set my favourites all the time, but would rather have a "Recent" section at the top of the list that gets populated with the 6(?) most recent Edit tools that I've used in the project (maybe initially based on favourites or simply empty until an Edit tool is used and populated as the list grows to a max number of tools).

‎09-08-2022

This would be a welcome addition. I've managed to write a python script that runs as a tool where you can input a value and it creates definition queries against specified layers, but it does need to be maintained if layers are renamed/added/remove, and it doesn't update or remove existing queries - they just stack up if you run it more than once.

‎09-07-2022

An additional comment after having my idea merged with this one - I would like to see a little bit more granular control over the locking mechanism as detailed above. Instead of the whole map (all or nothing), the ability to lock groups or individual layer positions (i.e. where they're more important than other layers) would be preferential.

‎09-06-2022

IDEA: Include ability to lock the order and grouping of layers in the Table of Contents in the Map (not layout) USE CASE: I've built numerous map templates with numerous grouped layers and where Models need to be run using map layers as the input parameters. If layers are reordered/ungrouped, it can break the input parameter meaning the user needs to figure out which layer was meant to be there. It would be good if I had the ability to lock the layer order and groupings in the Table of Contents to prevent unintended rearrangements, removals, groupings, etc. Something similar to the Lock/Unlock option in Map Layouts for elements but applied in the Map view. A locked layer would not be able to be dragged up/down, removed or grouped/ungrouped until the lock was disabled.

‎09-05-2022

Yeah - I thought it looked pretty buggy. I just went back to the project (which has since had the dynamic text deleted and static text put in it's place) and tried to recreate it. I'm using a newer version to my colleague (3.0 compared to 2.8) but it's still happening. I insert a new text box and copy the Plain Text view across and it works as intended. Obviously something wrong with that particular element. Not worth reporting as it's clearly not systemic, even within the project.

‎09-05-2022

Agreed. Being able to use the vehicles in-built nav system would be handy for navigation and also feature collection (though maybe this is better suited to Quick Capture but full Field Maps control through the dash would be best). It also means not having to break the law to use your mobile device while driving (at least in Australia).

‎09-01-2022

@Scott_Harris Bang on - yep. **bleep** terminology getting in the way of a good idea 😁

‎08-31-2022

Hi Scott. To clarify, I'm not talking about when creating features (that was just an example of where you can already set the default tool), but when editing existing features it would be good to change the default construction tool from Line Segment (to Trace for example).

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Wednesday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by LindsayRaabe_FPCWA

How do I make the While Iterator work in Model Builder

Re: Why isn't my model iterating for all features (2 iterators using sub models)

Re: What's Coming in ArcGIS Online (November 2022)

Why isn't my model iterating for all features (2 iterators using sub models)

Re: Change default split policy on new domains?

Re: Overwrite ArcGIS Online Feature Service using Truncate and Append

Re: Improve performance of Delete Rows Geoprocessing tool when source data is ArcOnline feature service

Add section for "Recent" in Tools section of Edit Ribbon

Re: Synced Query definition

Re: ArcGIS Pro: Lock the Map

Include ability to lock layer order in table of contents in ArcGIS Pro

Re: Why is my Text Box truncating the text inside it?

Re: [Field maps] Accessible dans Carplay ou Android Car

Re: Add ability to change default edit tool for all feature edits

Re: Add ability to change default edit tool for all feature edits - Status changed to: Needs Clarification

Re: Creating Dynamic Field Maps for Tools in Model...

Check all previous "required" questions are comple...

Re: Field Maps Smart Form Attachments Widget not O...

Show Survey123 forms as "Forms" instead of "Apps" ...

Re: Field Maps Smart Form Attachments Widget not O...

Experience Builder Tips and Tricks

Esri Forestry Group (EFG)

ArcGIS Arcade