|
POST
|
Hmmmm....this sounds like moving into model builder or python space. I'm not sure how you would go about splitting merged lots out again as you normally need a feature to split by which you wouldn't have. Using Model Builder, you could iterate through each dissolved lot (held in a temporary dataset) and determine if the new merged area is too large or not. Then based on the outcome either the original lots or the temporary merged lot would be appended to an output dataset. Would be a few steps to make all that happen, but thats what comes to mind if I was attempting to do it.
... View more
08-14-2024
05:25 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1558
|
|
BLOG
|
This has been an enlightening (and concerning) bit of reading!
... View more
08-13-2024
10:28 PM
|
0
|
0
|
7878
|
|
POST
|
That was an enlightening (and also concerning) read! Time to reach out to our Esri Liaison I reckon!
... View more
08-13-2024
10:27 PM
|
1
|
2
|
4437
|
|
POST
|
Always ask the question - we've had a few scenarios where things were "not possible" that later have seemed to indeed be possible (with some wrangling).
... View more
08-13-2024
10:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
5719
|
|
POST
|
So we've just finished migrating from one ArcGIS Online org to another (US to APAC hosting) and with it our licenses have changed a fair bit to try and make use of effiencies. We are Mobile Worker heavy with a few Creators and Contributors thrown in for good measure. All bar 1 of our Creator licenses are actually from having Single Use and Concurrent Desktop ArcGIS Pro licenses. We've heard rumours that the Concurrent licenses may be phased out in future licenses model updates. I'm wondering if anyone can comment on what the future holds in this regard. Are they likely to disappear? WOuld they be replaced 1 for 1 solely by Creators (which would be interesting given the makeup of Single Use, Primary Concurrent and Secondary Concurrent licenses and their differing prices). Because of the June changes to the User Types and Roles, we now have 9 Creator licenses in ArcGIS Online that we can't assign to anyone because we have no compatible user types. Thinking we'll have to convert them back to Single Use licenses if we want to use them. Additionally, we have Network Analyst and Spatial Analyst extensions that can only be accessed by Concurrent licenses. Would these be swapped to Add-On's that can be used by anyone (like in Concurrent mode) or must they be assigned to particular users?
... View more
08-13-2024
07:23 PM
|
0
|
4
|
4475
|
|
POST
|
I assume you have a value in mind for what deems a lot as undersized? I would do it one of 2 ways: 1. Add a field and calculate a value based on that lot area. Each Lot gets assigned either "Acceptable" or "Undersized". Next, Use the Dissolve tool and set that required fields as "Dissolve Fields" (including the one just added). If you only want contiguous undersized lots, then make sure you don't check the "Create Multipart features" option. 2. Instead of adding a field and calculating values, simply select all lots that are below the threshold area, then run the Dissolve as per above. Next, select all the lots that are above the threshold in the original dataset and append them to the output from the Dissolve to get a complete dataset. Dissolve (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
... View more
08-12-2024
08:36 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1608
|
|
POST
|
It sounds like you've looked in the obvious places: - Map properties > General > Background colour - Map frame properties > Background colour We've had instances of projects deciding to not export particular areas correctly for no apparent reason, and the only way of fixing it has been to rebuild the project from a blank start (copy over layers and layouts). Not ideal. My only other suggestion (which sounds like you may have also tried) is to switch to exporting as an image if not already.
... View more
08-12-2024
08:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1783
|
|
POST
|
My other tip would be to try holding the Ctrl button plus clicking the refresh display button at the bottom right of the map window. Holding Ctrl forces the cache to be cleared.
... View more
08-12-2024
05:32 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1314
|
|
POST
|
Might be helpful to post a screenshot or something. Hard to decode what's happened. My first instinct was that you zoomed to a feature that isn't located correctly (i.e. scale of 1:100,000,000 and out of position with the rest of the world based on incorrect coordinates or something like that).
... View more
08-12-2024
05:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1314
|
|
BLOG
|
This was a nice find in my inbox this morning. Thanks for the update!
... View more
08-12-2024
04:48 PM
|
5
|
0
|
3371
|
|
POST
|
The below GIF runs you through the tool creation and use, but if you would prefer to see it in full resolution and without so much cutting, watch it here on YouTube. The code used in the video is posted below. Even better - sample toolbox attached! #
# GP Script tool - Message
# for use in ModelBuilder
import arcpy
# Two text parameters:
# 0) Message type: ERROR, WARNING, INFORMATIVE
# 1) Message text
msgType = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0).upper()
msgText = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(1)
# Return msgText and format based on msgType parameter
if msgType.upper() == "ERROR":
arcpy.AddError(msgText)
elif msgType.upper() == "WARNING":
arcpy.AddWarning(msgText)
else:
arcpy.AddMessage(msgText)
... View more
08-01-2024
07:29 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2179
|
|
IDEA
|
Agree that it should remain visible at all times, not just when changing the zoom level. We have similar scale issues working in forestry where there are less "well-defined" features that you can judge scale from.
... View more
07-31-2024
05:51 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3840
|
|
IDEA
|
No worries. To be fair, I knew these settings were there but finding the relevant documentation pages still took a few searches!
... View more
07-31-2024
05:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1524
|
|
IDEA
|
This sounds like the Search function (set up in the WebMap Settings page) or even the filter function (configured in Field Maps Designer). Would these not do what you need?
... View more
07-31-2024
05:30 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1537
|
|
IDEA
|
@LyonMNGIS Great suggestions - especially marking the deprecated tools used in a model (little exclamation mark on a corner of the tools icon in the model flow instead of colour). Some way of bulk replacing deprecated tools with their newer counterparts would be very welcome!
... View more
07-02-2024
05:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3084
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Wednesday | |
| 2 | a week ago | |
| 4 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 2 | 2 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|