Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About RobertKrisher
RobertKrisher
Esri Regular Contributor
since
01-23-2015
yesterday
1028
Posts created
192
Kudos given
277
Solutions
581
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(0 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by RobertKrisher
|
POST
|
To be specific about your example, you would run an upstream trace and set a filter barrier on stop logs or on vaults that contain stop logs. This would then let you see all the upstream paths to stop logs, and if you see a path that goes all the way upstream (because there isn't a stop log) you would want to come up with a plan for how to tackle that path.
... View more
12-06-2025
02:59 PM
|
1
|
0
|
725
|
|
POST
|
@Joshua_Moreno There are three fields that are configured when using propagation, and the phases energized field store the results of the phasing that was calculated by the system. Phases energized is a symptom of the problem; the cause is that the field used for E:Phases Propagated (phasechange) is not populated. Here's a screenshot of the standard subnetwork definition for propagation: Here's a screenshot of the network attribute assignment for E:Phases Propagated. If you populate the phasechange field of all your features with the phasing value, instead of the phases energized field, then your subnetworks should start tracing. If you aren't 100% confident in your phasing, you may want to remove the propagators from your subnetwork so you can work through some of the simpler data issues first before you worry about having your phasing 100% accurate.
... View more
12-06-2025
02:45 PM
|
0
|
1
|
637
|
|
POST
|
@Joshua_Moreno if the subnetwork name isn't getting past the controller, then the phasing of your controller or lines are likely not populated or they don't match (i.e. your controller is C phase but the line is B phase). I agree with @MikeMillerGIS that without seeing your configuration with a small bit of data we can only guess about what is happening.
... View more
12-05-2025
12:38 PM
|
0
|
2
|
506
|
|
POST
|
@yockee 1. Create and manage attribute rules—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation 2. Before worrying too much about the backend (REST), I recommend you read more about the capability: Validation attribute rules—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
... View more
12-05-2025
12:35 PM
|
0
|
1
|
617
|
|
POST
|
The attribute rule is stored in the geodatabase and is exposed through a validation service to clients. There is also the ability to choose between enforcing rules client-side, or server-side only. I recommend you do some research on attribute rules and the validation service.
... View more
12-04-2025
07:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
636
|
|
POST
|
@TóthRóbert you can use the un properties extractor to extract all your field properties to a file, update them, then re-import them over a map. You can also copy/paste field properties between layers and different maps using the "Paste Properties" context menu option..
... View more
12-04-2025
07:06 PM
|
0
|
1
|
359
|
|
POST
|
@NathanHeickLACSD You will find these discussions in the intro and advanced sessions for the UN that we have at conferences, and you can find an article explicitly about the usage of filters here: Isolating failures using ArcGIS Utility Network
... View more
12-04-2025
07:03 PM
|
1
|
0
|
766
|
|
POST
|
Also, the connectivity trace ignores terminal directions and subnetwork controllers.
... View more
12-04-2025
06:59 PM
|
0
|
2
|
541
|
|
POST
|
1 - No 2 - You won't be able to run subnetwork, subnetwork controller, and isolation tracing. You will only be able to run upstream/downstream tracing with digitized direction. If you want to have attribution about tributaries, lift zones, etc you'll need to manage these using other means, since you won't have subnetworks to update. You also won't be able to use the IsConnected trace to identify disconnected elements, since it relies on traversabilty to subnetwork controllers. If you set up your treatment plant as a controller you'd be able to get most of this, you just wouldn't have the granularity to trace all of your sub-basins or any of the discharges downstream of your treatment plant (with subnetworks). 2a - Can you explain your use case around an isolation trace in a sewer system? Are you looking to isolate a pipe from its sink (i.e. simulating a blockage) or are you trying to determine how to place upstream barriers to isolate the area from upstream flow?
... View more
12-03-2025
12:19 PM
|
2
|
1
|
804
|
|
POST
|
The attribute rule is going to be more reliable and have a better user experience, especially if you're working with data that is versioned or coming in through mobile workflows. You can even make some attribute rules available to mobile users when they are offline, so even when they're editing a local copy of the data integrity is still enforced.
... View more
12-03-2025
12:17 PM
|
0
|
2
|
660
|
|
POST
|
When you do an upstream or downstream trace, you must either choose to use a domain/tier or you must choose digitized direction. You can run a digitized direction trace in an area of the network that has subnetwork controllers, but the trace will ignore the controllers to determine flow. A section of your network can belong to multiple subnetworks (within the same tier), as long as the controllers themselves can't connect to each other. In your example, if that manhole normally bifurcates flows, even when it is not under significant flow, then the area upstream of a manhole that bifurcates flow would belong to multiple tributaries and therefore multiple subnetworks. If the bifurcation only occurs when there is enough flow in the system, then the area upstream would only belong to a single subnetwork since under normal conditions water cannot flow to the second tributary.
... View more
12-02-2025
09:59 PM
|
1
|
2
|
860
|
|
BLOG
|
@dcoll86 the add-in was compiled and is provided as is with ArcGIS Pro 3.5. If you want to use it in a different version or have any issues with the tool, you will need to download and compile the calculate flow arrows community sample to meet your requirements. Having said that, the add-in does work on my ArcGIS Pro 3.6 install.
... View more
12-02-2025
06:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
394
|
|
POST
|
@crogis I'm not 100% sure exactly what's going on without seeing exactly what you're doing in your map. I recommend you read these two sources to understand the limitations around the different types of layers and the Add Join tool: Work with subtype group layers and tables—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation Add Join (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation If you think you're within the parameters of what we say we support, please log a case with support so they can step through your workflow with you and see exactly what you're donig.
... View more
12-02-2025
06:20 PM
|
0
|
0
|
772
|
|
POST
|
The field is updated when you run update subnetwork, but if you're using the standard ArcFM model you will only see that field updated when you run the tool in default. If you are not seeing this, please open a case with support.
... View more
12-01-2025
05:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
308
|
|
POST
|
Please log an issue with support for this to get a bug created so you can be notified when we release the patch that correct it.
... View more
12-01-2025
05:14 PM
|
0
|
1
|
188
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | Sunday | |
| 2 | Wednesday | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago |
Activity Feed
- Got a Kudo for Parsing Utility Network Diagnostic Logs. yesterday
- Got a Kudo for Re: Power Outage Trace. yesterday
- Posted Re: Power Outage Trace on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. yesterday
- Got a Kudo for Re: UN version 7, ArcGIS Pro 3.5.4 validation errors - a showstopper?. Monday
- Posted Re: Clipping of Utility Network Workflow on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Monday
- Posted Re: User interface is stuck when creating features (UN) on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Monday
- Posted Re: Update subnetwork not updating supported subnetwork name on a Electric Assembly feature on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Monday
- Posted Re: UN version 7, ArcGIS Pro 3.5.4 validation errors - a showstopper? on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Sunday
- Posted Re: Update subnetwork not updating supported subnetwork name on a Electric Assembly feature on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Sunday
- Posted Re: Migrate to utility network and Apply error resolution on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Sunday
- Posted Re: Migrate to utility network and Apply error resolution on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Saturday
- Posted Re: Source VS Sink tier tanks on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Saturday
- Kudoed Re: Best practices for UN client visualization for JasonDrost_FPUA. Friday
- Kudoed Re: Best practices for UN client visualization for gis_KIWI4. Friday
- Got a Kudo for Re: Change fields to uppercase. Thursday
- Kudoed Re: Anyone had Error 160277: The row contains a bad value while running load data using workspace? for BrettRosso. Thursday
- Got a Kudo for Re: Anyone had Error 160277: The row contains a bad value while running load data using workspace?. Thursday
- Got a Kudo for Parsing Utility Network Diagnostic Logs. Wednesday
- Got a Kudo for Re: Anyone had Error 160277: The row contains a bad value while running load data using workspace?. Wednesday
- Posted Re: Anyone had Error 160277: The row contains a bad value while running load data using workspace? on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. Wednesday
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|