|
POST
|
Definitely log a case with support, if there's aren't any other sessions validating default you shouldn't be seeing that error. It is interesting that you get the error with an ArcGIS Pro 3.7 client, but not an ArcGIS Pro 3.6 client.
... View more
05-22-2026
05:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1040
|
|
POST
|
In ArcGIS Pro each network diagram has its own set of layer definitions, which is essentially its own map. When you are creating a web map to view network diagrams in the web, you should ensure the web map you're using has a similar set of symbology and label expressions. You could try opening the network diagram in ArcGIS Pro, pointing the layers at the feature service for your network diagrams, fixing any issues with labeling/symbology, then publishing that as a web map used by your network diagram viewer app. Are you using a custom application to view the network diagrams in the web?
... View more
05-22-2026
05:51 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1709
|
|
POST
|
@DavidColey I'd start by logging a case with support since it may be a bug. If no one else is validating default on the server then you shouldn't see this error. How are you calling validate? Does validating manually via ArcGIS Pro or a geoprocessing tool work? Does this error happen immediately, or does it take a little while? Presumably this is in default, or is this in a named verion?
... View more
05-21-2026
05:04 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1112
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the info! It looks like this could be BUG-000184727, which is currently scheduled to be included in the next 11.3 patch. Support should be able to confirm the details of the bug, patch, etc. especially if you have a reproducible test case.
... View more
05-21-2026
04:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
422
|
|
POST
|
I don't see any append statement sin here. Is it possible you had the "Load Data" box unchecked?
... View more
05-21-2026
08:03 AM
|
0
|
7
|
1071
|
|
POST
|
@EdwardBlair if you really need to hide that feature you can add an output condition to the trace that will explicitly hide it. In this case, adding an output condition where the category is not equal to E:Fuse. I apologize for using screenshots of water data for this issue, I was having issues finding a spot in the electric project I was using where the fuses had terminals.
... View more
05-21-2026
07:15 AM
|
1
|
1
|
777
|
|
POST
|
I ask about the terminal thing because that is a designed behavior of trace, where we include the device as a barrier if it has terminals, even when the include barrier features option is not selected.
... View more
05-21-2026
06:47 AM
|
0
|
3
|
784
|
|
POST
|
Does the fuse have terminals/does this only happen when the fuse has terminals?
... View more
05-21-2026
06:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
785
|
|
POST
|
Log an issue, this is a bug. What version/patch level is ArcGIS Enterprise?
... View more
05-21-2026
05:49 AM
|
0
|
2
|
489
|
|
POST
|
Please include a log from the apply asset package and make sure you have the "load data" box checked. If you do need to manually append, set the field matching type to use field map. There are a few intentional field differences between the AP and a live utility network.
... View more
05-21-2026
05:45 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1107
|
|
POST
|
You can find the comprehensive list of which changes require disabling the network topology or are not allowed on utility network management tasks page. Schema changes that do not affect the utility network do not require disabling the network topology. Adding or removing a new field to a class the belongs to a utility network does not require disabling the network topology, as long as those fields don't have any network attributes associated with them.
... View more
05-20-2026
08:28 AM
|
2
|
1
|
447
|
|
POST
|
@gis_KIWI4 btw, this feature is now available in ArcGIS Pro 3.7. You'll need to upgrade to ArcGIS Enterprise 12.1 in order to use this with feature services. It does not require upgrading your utility network version.
... View more
05-20-2026
06:45 AM
|
1
|
0
|
582
|
|
POST
|
Even if you could intercept that call, I'm not sure how you would achieve what you're looking for? A simpler approach in this case might be to create an attribute rule that runs on create and update on the subnetwork line that reads the user partition information from the first active subnetwork controller for the subnetwork.
... View more
05-19-2026
06:47 AM
|
0
|
1
|
498
|
|
POST
|
You'll need to weigh the business value of having more granular network with the time it takes to manage all the individual networks. Individual subnetworks will trace and update quickly, but the biggest problem with managing a dataset with many thousands of subnetworks is the amount of time it takes to update ALL your subnetworks. This means you need to account for this additional time when you first go live, and every time you need to disable/enable your network topology to make schema changes. An alternative would be to only model subnetworks at the transformer level, and for the fuse-level transformers use something like the batch trace tool to calculate the individual fuse-level circuits. Note: ArcGIS Pro 3.7 introduces an optimization that allows the first time you run update subnetwork to be significantly faster, that will help with your initial deployment. I recommend you test this.
... View more
05-19-2026
06:38 AM
|
1
|
0
|
469
|
|
POST
|
Stop points are only used by the Path trace. We describe the Path trace and the new parameters you're seeing in this article: What's new for ArcGIS Utility Network with the 2026 Network Management Release
... View more
05-19-2026
06:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
503
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | Monday | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 1 | a week ago |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
4 hours ago
|