Latest Contributions by KoryKramer

Thanks for the confirmation. ... View more

Good catch.  Thank you, tormsby-esristaff‌.   ... View more

For anybody who runs across this thread and is looking for this functionality, please see Split irregular polygons into equal parts‌, add your vote and any specific user requirements in the comments. This idea is Under Consideration for inclusion as a geoprocessing tool in ArcGIS Pro. ... View more

Thank you for the clarification.  I see in our system that we have a similar enhancement request logged: [ENH-000108203: Add a geoprocessing tool to adjust raster elevation values according to a vertical datum transformation.] This is currently marked as In Product Plan. ... View more

You say that the source file is a .txt.   Commonly used locator styles—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop "In addition to a feature ID field and SHAPE field, feature classes that you can use as reference data for the locator must have a specific field that contains the unique name or value for that feature. It is this field in the attribute table that is referenced when geocoding against the reference data." If your source is just a .txt file, it doesn't have a Shape field.  I can repro the error when feeding the tool a txt source  Try converting your xy txt data to a point table first and then using that resulting table as input to the Create Address Locator tool: ... View more

Nava Sheer‌ and Dan Patterson‌ In Pro 2.1 you'll still need to check the Word Wrapping option for Labels under Legend > Arrangement.  I don't know all the ins and outs of the technical workings, but it has something to do with how Pro is creating "virtual columns" in the background in order to consider the user's settings.  In a sense, what is noted as a bug in the thread referenced above is more like a "known issue" -that is, Pro is working as designed.  However, from the feedback we're hearing it looks like there is a usability issue here so we'll make sure that the layout team is aware of it.  Thank you all for the feedback! ... View more

Thank you for the input, tpcolson‌. Alex and I communicated in October and received the project that was causing issues in layout - we passed that on to the development team so that they could investigate.  I don't have a specific response to that, but I know that they were looking into it.  At this point, since Pro 2.1 releases tomorrow, I would recommend upgrading and then test performance again. I know that you're highly aware of this, but for any others who stumble upon this thread, there are many factors that can result in performance issues for an end user.  Some of those might be in the control of ArcGIS Pro meaning that we could find an issue in how we do something, and change it to increase performance.  This is when it is very important for us to have specifics about the environment (OS, DBMS versions, details about numbers of layers, symbology, labeling, whether the issue persists in all maps/projects or not, etc. etc.)  And get some actual comparison times especially if comparing between ArcMap and ArcGIS Pro.  e.g. In ArcMap my layers in this map draw in 1 second and in ArcGIS Pro the same layers from the mxd that was imported draw in 10 seconds.  That is worth us investigating.   Because of the level of troubleshooting involved, these types of things are often best treated through a case with technical support, rather than threads in the Ideas space, or even GeoNet in general.  If you have examples where you're experiencing consistent performance differences when moving work from ArcMap to ArcGIS Pro, please help us by documenting that with support so that it can be treated in depth, and if needed, we can get these examples to the appropriate development team to investigate.  Thank you! ... View more

This behavior can be configured with the Attribute Assistant Add-in. http://solutions.arcgis.com/shared/help/attribute-assistant/ ... View more

This can be done using the Editing Attributes window ... View more

This might be accomplished using Attribute Assistant http://solutions.arcgis.com/shared/help/attribute-assistant/ ... View more

Fabric Point Move to Feature Add-in http://arcg.is/28OeXB2 ... View more

Supported as of 10.4: FAQ: Are vertical datum transformations supported in ArcGIS?  ... View more