Latest Contributions by JamesTedrick

Hi Erick, This may be best dealt with by filing a case with Esri Technical Support.  Among other things it would be helpful to understand: - Is this a hosted service or non-hosted service?  If non-hosted, which DBMS is being used - Are you submitting via the field app or the web app - It would be very helpful to have the Feature layer JSON information as well as capture the traffic of a submission attempt ... View more

Hi Brendon, I'll note a couple of things: Normal pixel density in Word is 96 pixels per Ince.  The 720x600 (wxh) maximum in the template translates to 7.5"x 6.25"; this would nearly force the image to the next page with your current template, even without any questions taking up more room in the table Rather than count on the row automatically expanding, you may want to explicitly set the heigh of the table rows to ensure a single page layout.  Look at the Table Properties for options ... View more

Hi Felix, Can you provide some information on how the form/feature service is designed?  Is there a parent record for the building and a related record for each inspector?  If so, then you would structure this as a repeat section.  If not, this may be more difficult to generate with the current repeat syntax. ... View more

Hi Paul, I am uncertain why Tech Support advised you that you would need to publish the feature class via ArcGIS Pro; you could certainly publish it via Survey123 (with a 'master' form that includes all of the related tables), provided that all of the relationships between objects, forms, etc. follow a 1:M or 1:1 relationship model (you would technically be publishing 1:M relationships only, but can simulate a 1:1 in Survey123 by using repeat_count to restrict to 1 record). The type of workflow you are describing typically makes greater use of URLs to launch Survey123 from Collector (or Explorer) rather than use the Inbox; values are passed in the URL to a new form.  The Inbox is solely used to retrieve existing records (a scenario for that is if there's a maintenance request form with a section to be completed once the request has been completed or rejected). I would also suggest joining the ArcGIS Field Maps beta - it sounds like that might also be an appropriate solution to the workflow you are describing. ... View more

Hi Helen, Thanks for the detailed explanation.  I have a couple of questions to clarify: - How are the Context index numbers generated? - Will your workers be working in an area where they would be offline/disconnected from ArcGIS Online or ArcGIS Enterprise (whichever you use)? It is possible (through a custom javascript function) to scan through a list of values to determine which have already been submitted to the table.  There can be some coordination issues if people are offline or if 2 people ask for the next number within a short time.  The alternative would be to 'issue' numbers (like a preprinted form that has a unique id) by creating records before going out to the field, assigning them to your workers (the equivalent of handing out the preprinted forms) and the workers using the Inbox to load the pre-assigned IDs.  These processes can be very specific to the data model you have, so it's a little hard to get in more detail without better knowledge of that. Yes, repeats do represent a 1:M relationship in the form and can be used for that purpose.  I will note that image questions now support a multiline appearance to capture multiple images for a question in the parent record, but if you are wanting any metadata (description, location, etc), you should place the image question inside a repeat. ... View more

Hi Andrew, It would be helpful if you could share your form.  The scenarios presented in your points are all supported - please find the attached XLSX file that demonstrates this. ... View more

Hi Paul, Can you provide details on the token generation?  What are the parameters (referrer, etc.) you are using? ... View more

Hi Ramon, This typically indicates an issue with the CSV file.  Can you check for some common issues: - empty lines at the bottom - a single quotation mark (either single or double) occurring in text (for example, O'Brien) - non-text or numeric characters in the column headers (spaces, dashes, etc). ... View more

Hi Laurren, Could you compare the order of the original feature service and stakeholder views?  They should be same and that is the order that the export would be based on.  That being said, are you seeing the column names have their position in the sheet appended to the name of the column (as your list indicates)?  That should not be occuring. ... View more

Hi Deon, This sounds very similar to BUG-000132152, which has been reported on a Mesa 2.  The issue is being looked at; if you want to add your case to the Esri BUG, we will be able to reach out once a fix is available for testing. ... View more

Hi Reuben, Just to confirm, this is a duplicate post with https://community.esri.com/message/952395-re-survey123-feature-report-failed-to-parse?commentID=952395, correct? ... View more

Hi Christine, The Survey123 field and web apps will use the geocodes that are configured with your organization; you can select which one to use in the field app.  See Geopoints—ArcGIS Survey123 | Documentation .  Note that for public surveys, only the ArcGIS World Geocoder will be available as that is a known public geocoder. ... View more

Hi Sulette, Yes, this is a limitation with Survey123 Connect - additional values are not appended to the list of choices.  You can add them via the Item Details page of the Feature Layer by selecting the 'Data' tab and then the 'Fields' view.  See Define attribute lists and ranges—ArcGIS Online Help | Documentation for more information. ... View more

Hi Amanda, I will say we don't expect every question type to be usable in the same manner for all platforms, given the inherent limitations of screen real estate.  The issues you are highlighting were discussed during the design of the single choice grid; that being said, the main implementation platform driving that question format was the web app (generally a desktop form factor) found the design acceptable on tablets as well. Similarly, while you can create a single choice list with 50 choices using the default or horizontal appearance, we generally expect an author to use minimal or autocomplete because those appearances better meet the usability in navigating those types of choice lists. ... View more

Hi Amanda, I'm not sure that extending just the first line would work; that's a solution only if the longest word was in the first line.  Given the nature of the labels, in the particular case you're presenting it may be that a single choice grid may not be appropriate; substituting Likert, for example, yields only a little more space being taken up:   ... View more