Latest Contributions by CraigGillgrass

Mark, You should be able to workaround this by ensuring that all fields are added to the feature template, prior to publishing the data.  This is the bug in Field Maps, we're only looking at the list of fields in the feature template when populating the list of fields under Default Values. If this doesn't work - please let me know. Craig ... View more

Sounds like this will continue to be a known issue in the Online Data tab but we'll address it in Field Maps. The Update privilege is the one you want to enable for this to work once we address the bug. Craig ... View more

Robert, can you also check what the field lengths are for the Workforce field and the field you're trying to integrate with in Survey`123? ... View more

@RobertAnderson3 can you send a screenshot?  Is the error now appearing in the Integrations dialog for Workforce? ... View more

@MikeOnzay I dug in to this a bit more.  You'll need to add the Administrative privileges > Content > Update privilege However, even when you do that, there's a bug in Field Maps (and probably Online) in that, we're not honoring that privilege to allow you to update the List (i.e. Coded Value Domain) I've got an issue in our backlog to address for the Fall release of Field Maps. Craig ... View more

@ShannonJ maybe we can take this offline and setup a call to discuss?  I've got something questions on your workflow that would be best talked through on a call.  Can you reach out to me at cgillgrass@esri.com thanks, Craig ... View more

@MikeOnzay Is the user able to manage the list through the Data tab on the Item Details page for the Feature Layer in Online?  We're following the same rules re: updates to feature layers as Online is.   I believe I've got a user set up like yours, my user is unable to edit the List in either Online or Field Maps. I also believe this is by design for the time being: https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/share-maps/create-groups.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_12B3CD7ADAF843DB90182A01824B3152 I have reached out to a few people to ask if there are any plans to change this. Craig ... View more

I stand corrected @elpinguino we have supported these devices, which one in particular are you looking to use? ... View more

@elpinguino Have you identified the edits you've made to the Assignment Integrations table as the cause of the failure? Do you have another Workforce project without those edits that you can test to see if this is a failure also occurs with it? There are logs that you can look at for the Map Area creation failure, these are steps you would take in the browser to determine the reason for the failure.  This is a good topic that walks through the steps https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-blog/offline-packaging-quot-failed-quot-how-to-attain/ba-p/1103312 ... View more

Hi @ShannonJ  Yes, based on our current thinking. Field users would be able to see unassigned assignments, self-assign or choose to pick them up, so they can complete the work. Would this help with your use case?  Do you think this would satisfy the request to assign an assignment to multiple field users? thanks, Craig ... View more

This is on our list to address for the Fall release of Field Maps. ... View more

@ShannonJ we do have it on our roadmap to allow field users to see all unassigned assignments; the timeline for this will be after Workforce is integrated into Field Maps, the timeline for that work is next year. We don't have any plans to include the ability to assign a single assignment to multiple field users. Craig ... View more

Workforce is not certified on this type of device. ... View more

@KatieGaut @JustinReynolds  We're working on mitigating this for the Fall release of Field Maps, we'll have a progress indicator during Save so that you'll be unable to continue editing the form until the save completes. We're looking to continue to improve this after the Fall release to ideally make the Save operation asynchronous so you can continue editing while a save is occuring. Craig ... View more