|
IDEA
|
Hate to break this to ya...your Trimble is right behind Arc Pad on it’s way to Jurassic Park.....even if there was an ArcPad add in for Pro there’s no way for the Pro architecuture to “talk” to the prehistoric OS that is running on the Trimble.
... View more
12-22-2017
09:40 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2425
|
|
IDEA
|
I voted this up...before checking...it seems like this capability exits?
... View more
12-22-2017
07:25 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3181
|
|
POST
|
Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not seeing where it's possible to replicated the dual-UTM-ZONE grid collar as described http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=e0b0c2f2160c4812b4c11bc599e629f1.
... View more
12-19-2017
09:36 AM
|
0
|
2
|
3769
|
|
POST
|
From a workflow standpoint, this only differs from editing graphics in that you're editing features now instead. I disagree. Here's a good example why "Attribute Driven Symbology" is preventing my migration to Pro. I have hundreds of road gates to map. On our current cartographic product, we always show the gate as closed using representation, to indicate that a) there's a gate you CAN close; b)you might need a key; or c) drive a big enough fire truck to plow through a gate, should one be found locked before you. In other words, depicting gates in a common and easy to see cartographic style has a public safety need. In ArcMap, this is easy. All my gates are points, they intersect the road, I use the representation rotate tool to rotate the gate perpendicular to the road. According to this, the only way I can do that in Pro is by picking a value or direction ...which I'd have to assign to each point, after measuring the angle of the intersection of the road and the point (for some 450 gates). And yes, gates come, go, and move so I need to update this infrequently. Here's a more complex example, which, unless I'm missing a really obvious "button" or "menu", is not reproducible in Pro. Here I can move all my representation symbols away from the feature(s) being represented, align them, make them the same size, rotate them (all at once), and place them where they exhibit the least distortion from what the viewer needs to see in terms of geography. If I don't like where all 8 "symbols" are, I can select all 8 of them, once I've spent 15 minutes aligning, rotating, and scaling, I can drag all 8 around to the point where they convey that you will find these 8 services, and not cover up other geographic features. I do agree with It looks like ArcGIS Pro has not (yet) been designed for users with traditional mapping workflows It would he helpful, if Pro 2.3 or 2.whatever was the "We're focusing on cartography release" version.
... View more
12-18-2017
11:07 AM
|
3
|
6
|
2804
|
|
IDEA
|
On that note, what happened to Make Same Size/Width/Height? When aligning many elements, such as dual scale bars, text boxes, map frame insets, this is critical. I don't see how Pro can be used to create cartographic products without this ability. Is this a setting that is buried somewhere, like the page units decimal places? A turned-off tool that needs to be added to the ribbon? I see in Pro one can select multiple elements and "guess" at the Width/Height, but that requires clicking on each one first, writing down the dimensions, than experimenting which one is the one you want to apply to all elements.
... View more
12-15-2017
06:48 AM
|
5
|
1
|
8179
|
|
POST
|
This doesn't appear to have been fixed at 2.0.1 unless the "patch" is a separate download. The following runs fine as a logged in user, but fails when run as other user -> service account. The same service account has been successfully triggering 2.7 scripts for years, so it's not an OS permission issue. Never had any of these required to be authenticated to a Portal issues with 2.7, it's not clear why authentication to a Portal is required in 3.5.3 just to import a library. C:\Users\sasquatch>"C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\bin\Python\envs\arcgispro-py3\p ython.exe" C:\PRODUCTION\GRSM_DISTURBANCE\DISTURBANCE\Maps\ArcGIS\UPDATE_GRSM_DI STURBANCE_PRO.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PRODUCTION\GRSM_DISTURBANCE\DISTURBANCE\Maps\ArcGIS\UPDATE_GRSM_DISTU RBANCE_PRO.py", line 1, in <module> import arcpy File "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\Resources\ArcPy\arcpy\__init__.py", line 66, in <module> from arcpy.geoprocessing import gp File "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\Resources\ArcPy\arcpy\geoprocessing\__init__ .py", line 14, in <module> from ._base import * File "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\Resources\ArcPy\arcpy\geoprocessing\_base.py ", line 14, in <module> import arcgisscripting RuntimeError: Not signed into Portal.
... View more
12-12-2017
09:05 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2774
|
|
POST
|
I believe the question is why can’t we publish to server from Pro? “Buy another expensive application and hire a full time sys admin to run it” isn’t really helpful There are far more business requirements that call for nothing more than a REST endpoint than there are for content management and discovery. Adding Portal as another barrier to meeting that requirement unessesary.
... View more
12-09-2017
03:09 PM
|
9
|
5
|
3745
|
|
IDEA
|
Not a solution....but a workaround...Avenza lets your “display” in UTM....
... View more
12-08-2017
11:22 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2626
|
|
IDEA
|
half-way there: The "real" metadata is there now if I go to Catalog -> View Metadata, however, the "Map"(?) metadata is still blank (output), where it is populated (source).
... View more
12-07-2017
12:03 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1250
|
|
POST
|
When export a PDF out of Arc, I can subsequently edit text elements in Acrobat: The same imported map in Pro -> Export to PDF -> Attempt to edit any text element results in the following: Is this by design?
... View more
12-07-2017
10:39 AM
|
1
|
24
|
10601
|
|
IDEA
|
In Pro, when running a GP tool (e.g Clip) on a feature class that has detailed metadata, there is no metadata in the output. Arcmap GP tools do not strip the metadata from the output. And since Pro has no way to import metadata....
... View more
12-07-2017
08:30 AM
|
2
|
4
|
1347
|
|
POST
|
A very disappointing response from ESRI, as the lack of support for this tool in Portal is not documented. I wouldn't have gone through all the trouble to deploy it, then spend months troubleshooting it, and hours on the phone explaining the problem. Why aren't GeoJSON and GPX supported in Portal? Isn't Portal the same platform as AGOL? The status of Esri BUG-000104018 - When Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS (Developer Edition) is configured with Portal for ArcGIS, adding a .gpx file using the Add Data widget fails. - that you have been associated with has been changed to Not in Current Product Plan. Public Explanation: GeoJSON and GPX files are not supported in Portal for ArcGIS backend.
... View more
12-06-2017
04:26 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2557
|
|
POST
|
Will since you have an EGDB.....this is another one of those "Tech support will disown you" hacks #if they catch you doing it but... In SQL Management Studio, change the object_flags to 4 (from 256) and sde_type to 14 (from 12) for the GlobalID column in SDE_column_registry for both feature classes. Then do you move. Remember to change them back!
... View more
12-05-2017
09:13 AM
|
3
|
3
|
21021
|
|
IDEA
|
In Pro, when recalculating a spatial index where the index had originally been set to a custom geography or geometry grid (in my example Geography Auto, 1028 cells per grid), Pro will automatically kick that down to 16 cells per grid. Pro should have the ability for the user to select Geography or Geography Auto, and specify the cells per object, which will have drastic effects on performance, as point, line, and poly feature classes are very sensitive to tessellation when they have thousands of features.
... View more
12-05-2017
08:21 AM
|
4
|
1
|
1283
|
|
POST
|
Scott Stopyak I found the issue behind ""User cant overwrite this service, using this data, as this data is already referring to another service."". From Updating your hosted feature services with ArcGIS Pro and the ArcGIS API for Python | ArcGIS Blog , the item search is executed with: sdItem = gis.content.search("{} AND owner:{}".format(sd_fs_name, user), item_type="Service Definition")[0] Replace that with: sdItem = gis.content.search(query="title:"+ sd_fs_name + " AND owner: " + user)[0] The original search string was somehow causing the search to go boolean, which may or may not return the service name you had set with sd_fs_name, because it wasn't restricting the search to the item title. For example, if your service title was "BIG SASQUATCH", using the original search string would return the first item that had "SASQUATCH" any where in the title, tags, summary, or description, in my case, it would always return "SASQUATCH TRAINING". Accessing and creating content | ArcGIS for Developers provided some insight on the correct way to format the search. Here's how I tested this: import arcpy import os, sys from arcgis.gis import GIS sd_fs_name = "SASQUATCH" portal = "http://www.arcgis.com" # Can also reference a local portal user = "yabbayabbadoo" password = "sasquatch" print("Connecting to {}".format(portal)) gis = GIS(portal, user, password) print("Searching for SD on AGOL...") sdItem = gis.content.search("{} AND owner:{}".format(sd_fs_name, user), item_type="Service Definition")[0] print("Found SD: {}, ID: {}".format(sdItem.title, sdItem.id)) print("Search for HFS on AGOL...") hfsItem = gis.content.search("{} AND owner:{}".format(sd_fs_name, user), item_type="Feature Service")[0] print("Found HFS: {}, ID: {}".format(hfsItem.title, hfsItem.id)) print("Search for HFS on AGOL using simple search...") sshfsItem = gis.content.search(query="title:"+ sd_fs_name + " AND owner: " + user)[0] print("Found ssHFS: {}, ID: {}".format(sshfsItem.title, sshfsItem.id))
... View more
12-05-2017
04:32 AM
|
8
|
3
|
9433
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-17-2022 12:19 PM | |
| 1 | 03-14-2019 06:24 AM | |
| 1 | 07-12-2018 09:29 AM | |
| 1 | 06-27-2019 12:08 PM | |
| 2 | 09-23-2019 11:03 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-26-2026
07:12 AM
|