|
POST
|
You're gonna hate this, but this is what TS is going to have you do.....Did you reboot, and same problem? After rebooting, create a new Pro project on a network drive, close Pro. Same issue? Are you starting Pro from a template? Same issue if you start Pro using Blank Template? Are you able to add folder connections to those network drives?
... View more
07-17-2018
12:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2113
|
|
POST
|
I believe that is the intended behavior. If you have 5 layouts sourced from one map, turning a layer off in the map will turn it off in the 5 layouts. If you want 5 different layouts, just copy the map (4 times), and link each map to its unique layout.
... View more
07-17-2018
09:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
12567
|
|
POST
|
Not able to reproduce, but I'm not sure I understand your workflow. If you can make a recording with the super easy to use screentogif free application, and post it here. It will take you 2 minutes...
... View more
07-17-2018
09:24 AM
|
0
|
1
|
12567
|
|
POST
|
Ok so I was able to reproduce with graduated colors. Here's the problem: When you remove the outline color (set it to none), the outline width remains .7 Which is the line we're seeing the PDF. When you set the outline width to 0, the pdf lines disappear. This is something I've seen in Arc Map as well, depending on how you export, so I'm grudgingly not going to claim this is a bug, but a limitation of how Adobe renders the PDF. So the solution here is, when you truly want no polygon outlines, remove the color and set line width to 0.
... View more
07-17-2018
09:16 AM
|
3
|
2
|
6892
|
|
POST
|
Can you share more details? What type of change are you making? A new scale bar? Panning and Zooming? Making the change with in "Activate" Mode? A screen capture using screen-to-gif would probably get your issue solved quickly.
... View more
07-17-2018
08:57 AM
|
0
|
5
|
12567
|
|
POST
|
I'm not getting your exact problem, but something similar where the source is a 10.5.1 Feature Service, with these export settings. Can you share the exact details of the source data (type, location, format, version), how it's symbolized, and how you're exporting it, and where you're exporting it? Pro: PDF:
... View more
07-17-2018
08:56 AM
|
1
|
5
|
6892
|
|
POST
|
I get that parameters need to be set in Tool Properties. What is not clear, is, why, in Pro, is a derived parameter needed for something that alters the schema, when this was not needed in Arc Map.
... View more
07-17-2018
03:59 AM
|
2
|
0
|
4385
|
|
POST
|
In terms of data access, locally stored always is faster, in Arc and in Pro. However, with locally, there are other Pro performance issues. I just used what I think are one of your Py decorator examples to time stamp some common GP tasks. Everyone of them is slower in Pro/Pro Py. Neither behave nicely with SDE all of the time, IMHO, it's just Arc Map "chatters" less with SDE than Pro does. That much is evident from numerous traces, profilers, and perfmon counters. Back in the good old "T1 Line" Days, you couldn't even connect to a remote SDE with any ESRI product. So a lot of this is function of your WAN speed, but, like I exemplified above, even on the same LAN connection (a 7 MB VPN today), Arc outperforms Pro.
... View more
07-15-2018
12:27 PM
|
1
|
2
|
3948
|
|
POST
|
Changing symbology of a SDE point feature class in Pro 2.2: Note how long it takes. Looking at wireshark logs while this is occurring, an incredible amount of traffic is going back and forth to SDE. Why? Because in Arc Map, I can change the symbology 5 times in the same amount of time it takes to change symbology in Pro. And guess how much back and forth is occurring with SDE when I do this in Arc....not much... Performance gets even worse when you turn off caching for a map layer, which was the solution to BUG-000113527 ArcGIS Pro Attribute pane fails to dynamically update data for values calculated through SQL for published feature services. The result of the bug that I logged on this in 2.1 is "Implemented in 2.2", so I'm hopeful that others in the community are experiencing this same specific issue: "Changing symbology in Pro takes 2-10 times longer in Pro than the same exact SDE data source does in Arc" and can get some attention on this issue that, judging from the other posts in this thread, probably affects a very large number of enterprise customers. I plan to reopen the case, but expect a "cannot reproduce" outcome......
... View more
07-15-2018
11:41 AM
|
8
|
8
|
3948
|
|
POST
|
Speaking of core parking, there is a registry setting you can change that will permanently unpark them......
... View more
07-15-2018
08:30 AM
|
2
|
5
|
3394
|
|
POST
|
So I logged a bug on this, and the response was "Not in Current Product Plan: When more than one symbol is selected, you can only access the basic properties of the symbols. Addressing this limitation is under consideration for a future release. See the first cell in the first table here: http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/symbols-and-styles/modify-symbols.htm". My work-around is: Set symbology to unique values, More -> Format All Symbols, pick the black circle, which makes them all black, back to Primary Symbology, pick a new color ramp, which achieves the desires result.
... View more
07-14-2018
10:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6167
|
|
IDEA
|
In Pro 2.2, one has the ability to set indexing to run even when not signed into the computer, which is pretty handy, as you can set to run every night and completely reindex everything, which gives you a very small (5%) performance increase. Very easy, just type in your account password, hit OK, you can leave work with confidence knowing that Pro will be faster tomorrow because when you hit OK, there was no error message. Everything worked perfectly...... With one major caveat. Based on ESRI responses in other GN posts, the assumption is that every Pro user has complete administrative privileges over their workstation. The opposite is reality. The trend in most organizations is Zero Trust and Least Privileged Access. The typical GIS user does not have any sort of admin access to their workstation, and IT has do all of the installation and config changes, or they have at least automated the install (SCCM). So how does that relate to our Indexing situation? The standard M$ Workstation STIG, which most organizations roll into their Group Policy, is to deny right to log on as batch job and right to log on as service. Exemptions typically include an AD group that only the central IT folks have access to, e.g a service that updates Antivirus or updates the GPO policy. Very few, if any, GIS folks are going to be in that exemption group. So what happens when you check Update even if you are signed out of the computer is a Scheduled Task is created, but fails, as the user attempting to create the task does not have permissions to create a scheduled task. This can be confirmed by editing the task that is created when you check Update Only When you are signed into the computer and change it to "Run when logged out". The problem is that Pro didn't report this task creation failure, and the user now thinks that indexing is going to run successfully every hour or every night when not logged in. In reality, indexing is now never running. In rare instances, setting the same indexing option (run when logged off) will not report failure when you set it while not logged into the network. Pro will not report failure, even though you can't schedule a task to run as a domain user when not logged into the domain. I tested this in an account configuration that is in the exemption group (which takes me two hours to login to). This idea isn't about making some change to Pro that will allow indexing to run when not logged on when the user does not have permission to create scheduled tasks. That's not possible, as few IT folks are going to put dozens, hundreds, or thousands of users in a GPO exemption group that exposes incredible security risks. Using a local or System account won't work either, as many things that Pro indexes are access controlled by AD (e.g SDE connections) and again, IT is not going to be giving local computer accounts access to network shares and SDE databases. I considered using a service account, but again, that involves GPO exemptions and visiting every computer to set it up, and currently GPO only allows service accounts NOT in an exemption group to run tasks on servers, not workstations. Getting a service account added to a workstation GPO literally would require an Act of Congress. Two things together (not separately, or just one)will make this idea "Implemented": When someone checks Update even if you are signed out of the computer, types their password, and hits OK, if task scheduler fails to create the task, the error message needs to be returned to the Pro user in an understandable text; Documentation needs reflect that checking Update even if you are signed out of the computer requires an account that has Local Log on as Batch Job privileges. When I say most, I'm well aware there are IT departments that don't ever want to hear from their GIS users and give them the admin keys to the whole network.... I know this is really Mickey Mouse but I know I'm going to have a ton of users checking that option, then 2 months later complaining about how slow Pro is, and I'll be on the phone with TS for hours trying to figure out why. I'm fine with just allowing indexing to run when logged in, I agree with the IT folks, no one in their right mind should grant everyone access to a security-risk setting. A third, hopeful but unlikely outcome of this idea is the ESRI consider how Pro is deployed in most organizations security posture,and adjust accordingly. I can assure you, the IT folks pay attention to stuff like this when they consider what software will be allowed on the network. Software that requires more work on their behalf (e.g require only IT folks, the only folks with admin rights to install service packs 4 times per yer) is going to become less and less popular. I'm toying with the idea of allowing per user installation of Pro, which mitigates some of these issues, but that raises more problems when 10 users try that on the same workstation that has a 500 GB drive (remember, each installation of Pro requires 32 GB of free space!), and I'm pretty sure IT's not going to allow it.
... View more
07-14-2018
06:52 AM
|
1
|
2
|
2462
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-17-2022 12:19 PM | |
| 1 | 03-14-2019 06:24 AM | |
| 1 | 07-12-2018 09:29 AM | |
| 1 | 06-27-2019 12:08 PM | |
| 2 | 09-23-2019 11:03 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-26-2026
07:12 AM
|