Latest Contributions by ThomasColson

In the Pro-version of this script, what would be really "Bling" is an option to resize attachments.  ... View more

This "shouldn't" be happening at the latest release, so nothing to resolve, but I've had a few SDE-flavor-specific cases where wonky things happen with field calculator. Specific and reproducible steps for your workflow might result in an existing bug answer or a suggestion to call TS.  ... View more

I wouldn't consider this an "enhancement", it's a bug. Bump to the point that unversioned SDE feature classes are the norm for most enterprise users. I can't tell you how many times I've fat fingered 1 or many edits on an unversioned FC in ArcMap and thankfully had the option to Stop and Discard edits. I'm sorry, but I have to call out "...you’ll find all the same functionality available (with very few exceptions) plus new updates not available in ArcMap.". I know all the peeing and moaning about equivalency isn't adding much to the conversation, but as a program administrator with a many-years-long lead time on major IT projects, I have to look to what I'm going to be doing 5 years from now, now, and that includes planning for when ArcMap might no longer be on the approved software list due to it not being in the "General" support column. I don't think it would be very hard for ESRI to focus development efforts on the next release 100% on equivalency issues, instead of "new" features. Just once? Back in the day we called these "LAN parties". Yes, I had a Cisco switch with handles screwed on to it....... To ESRI's credit, in the same document, "It isn’t an update to ArcMap, but a totally new application...", but most customers aren't looking at it that way. We really don't have the luxury of running two desktop GIS platforms side by side for more than a few months.  ... View more

There was something specific about one of the entries, and how it was fixed (or not), that put it in "jail".  ... View more

I believe either #BUG-000085913 'Table to Domain' does not show the new domain unless the project is closed and re-opened or #BUG-000116032 When a script is run that creates domains in a feature class, these domains are successfully created. If a second script is run that creates additional domains, these domains would not appear until ArcGIS Pro is closed and relaunched is going to apply to your situation. Split your model where it's failing, run the 1st half, restart Pro, then betcha the second half won't fail now.  ... View more

I don't think there's going to be any rush for sqlite support anytime soon. Many organizations are blocking it from the network, too many security holes.  https://www.cvedetails.com/vendor/9237/Sqlite.html ... View more

What is your exact workflow, and what errors are you seeing? What type of GDB? SQL? File? On the network or on your computer? There is a known bug with assigning domains to fields in Pro, but without more details I couldn't tell. ... View more

I use something like this, that will check if a required domain exits, if the domain exists, check for required values, check if a field exists, and assign the domain to the field. It will also add things if they don't exist at all. Can be easily modified to meet your requirement.. try: # 2 Create COUNTY field and TLU_COUNTY domain if user checked box in_Field = "COUNTY" if str(isCOUNTYchecked) == 'true': TLU_COUNTYDict = {"Swain":"Swain", "Blount": "Blount", "Sevier": "Sevier", "Cocke": "Cocke", "Haywood": "Haywood", "Graham": "Graham", "Monroe": "Monroe"} domains = arcpy.da.ListDomains(gdb_name) domain_names = [domain.name for domain in domains] if 'TLU_COUNTY' in domain_names : arcpy.AddWarning("TLU_COUNTY already exists") for domain in domains: if domain.name == 'TLU_COUNTY': values = [cv for cv in domain.codedValues] if not set(set(["Swain", "Blount", "Sevier", "Cocke", "Haywood", "Graham", "Monroe"])).issubset(values): arcpy.AddWarning("TLU_COUNTY is missing a coded value pair.") for code in TLU_COUNTYDict: arcpy.AddCodedValueToDomain_management(gdb_name, "TLU_COUNTY", code, TLU_COUNTYDict ) arcpy.AddWarning("But Sasquatch took care of it.") else: arcpy.SetParameterAsText(10, gdb_name) arcpy.CreateDomain_management(gdb_name, "TLU_COUNTY", "County feature occurs in", "TEXT", "CODED") arcpy.AddMessage ("Sasquatch created the TLU_COUNTY domain") for code in TLU_COUNTYDict: arcpy.AddCodedValueToDomain_management(gdb_name, "TLU_COUNTY", code, TLU_COUNTYDict ) arcpy.AddMessage ("Sasquatch added coded domain values to the TLU_COUNTY domain") if len(arcpy.ListFields(fc_name,in_Field))>0: arcpy.AddWarning (in_Field+" exits already") else: arcpy.AddField_management(fc_name, in_Field, "TEXT", "", "", 30, in_Field, "NULLABLE", "NON_REQUIRED", "TLU_COUNTY") arcpy.AddMessage ("Sasquatch created the "+in_Field+" field and the attribute domain is TLU_COUNTY") arcpy.AssignDefaultToField_management(fc_name, in_Field) else: arcpy.AddWarning(in_Field+" field will not be created") ... View more

What is the storage format of your data? In principal, no, there is no way to propogate attribute column changes globally. Python is the closest approximation to accomplish this, either to modify an existing field or add new, to very many feature classes at once.  ... View more

What is the JSON url? Your post contains very few details about the source data and the error you are encountering. Pro does not yet support direct consumption of GeoJSON, which is very unfortunate, however, your problem may be solved by one of the many comments in https://community.esri.com/ideas/13080-arcgis-pro-direct-geojson-support ... View more

Where this came from....I have Lidar that covers  my entire jurisdiction, we very often have a requirement to do highly accurate 3D profiles, for example, to determine suitability for a rescue litter on a trail. The ESRI elevation "service" doesn't even compare to the resolution of our in-house DEM. It smooths things out too much whereas the 1 m I use can show exactly where a wheeled litter is not going to work. Just had a request last week for a profile where folks were going to be hiking up and down the same trail multiple times, and we needed to look at the safety aspect of repeat up/down hill hikes. In ArcMap, while complicated, we can produce some pretty detailed results. Not so in Pro. Hoping this existing capability gets migrated! ... View more

A couple of things going on here. Attempting to create a new FGDB for the output dialogue appears to be a little wonky, giving you no choice for FGDB name, nor any feedback that is created one in the first place. Second, upon running the tool, it does output yet another FGDB. From https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/conversion/kml-to-layer.htm, I do not see the explicit words as follows: "This tool will create an output filegeodatabase" and "there is no option to use an existing file geodatabase", so the conclusion is a tool bug or a documentation bug. I'm going with the former, as I can't fathom how you would NOT want the option of going to an existing FGDB. Didn't compare this to ArcMap.  ... View more

A couple of things going on here. Attempting to create a new FGDB for the output dialogue appears to be a little wonky, giving you no choice for FGDB name, nor any feedback that is created one in the first place. Second, upon running the tool, it does output yet another FGDB. From https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/conversion/kml-to-layer.htm, I do not see the explicit words as follows: "This tool will create an output filegeodatabase" and "there is no option to use an existing file geodatabase", so the conclusion is a tool bug or a documentation bug. I'm going with the former, as I can't fathom how you would NOT want the option of going to an existing FGDB. Didn't compare this to ArcMap.  ... View more

Are you logged into Portal or AGOL? What type of licensing? Named user or concurrent? What license level? A video grab using https://getsharex.com/ will tell the whole story very quickly ... View more