|
POST
|
We enforce enterprise login for our AGOL org, but frequently new users, especially S123 and Collector users, are confused about what enterprise login means, and will usually choose "ArcGIS Login", then "I forgot my password". They then get this email: Hello Sasquatch, You recently requested support concerning your ArcGIS password. Please contact your administrator(s) [someone], [some one else], or [nobody] to resolve this matter. Thanks, The ArcGIS Accounts Team This is an automated email. Please do not reply. What I'd like it to do is: Hello Sasquatch, You recently requested support concerning your ArcGIS password. Please follow the instructions at www.howtologin.com. Please contact your administrator(s) [someone], [some one else], or [nobody] if you continue to have problems logging in. Thanks, The ArcGIS Accounts Team This is an automated email. Please do not reply
... View more
05-31-2019
10:22 AM
|
0
|
0
|
554
|
|
DOC
|
I intended "Budget Workstation" to meet the exact scenario.
... View more
05-31-2019
09:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
35024
|
|
DOC
|
I frequently get hit up for hardware advice when folks suddenly find them selves in possession of an account that they need to zero out (quickly). I also like to have some Dell e-quotes on hand if I happen to be one of those people. In years past I send (or reply) to some email threads on this topic, figure I'd share the good stuff with everyone this year. In most organizations, there is a seasonal budget cycle where capital purchases (such as GIS workstations) fall into a pretty narrow window. As a GISer, you have to compete with other needs (A snowplow is more important than a GIS workstation), so I try to be reasonable when spec'ing out a GIS computer, and consider what the person using the computer really needs versus what the organization considers that person's productivity metric considering their job description. My "picks" are based on the user requirement that the workstation will be able to run ArcGIS Pro for a minimum of three years and limp along running Pro at up to five years with hardware upgrades. Every thing listed below is what I got with last years workstation buy, so is based on testing and experience. We only had one "Budget Workstation" be DOA, however, IT is not happy with my Thunderbolt Dock recommendations, as we have had 4 of them have to be replaced, and the replacements are still hokey. Not gonna lie, all of these builds have a little bit of sticker shock. Emphasis on what I confidently think will meet your production-GIS-shop needs to run Pro for three years. For all builds I didn't customize any peripherals, because, as a GIS person, you should be getting Carpal-Tunnel Friendly mouse and Keyboard that Dell doesn't make. Budget Laptop I targeted this one for public-safety folks (SAR, Fire), as feedback I've gotten from them is they want small and light, due to their frequent travel. My goal was to stay under 3000$. If you have some extra loot, I'd add two more sticks of 16 GB RAM (this has 4 slots, making it a good candidate to upgrade next fiscal year). If you have a lot of extra money, upgrade to the P2000 video card. I see no advantage to going to a faster hard drive or processor, as that 8850 gives you 12 virtual cores. If this is your first new laptop in a few years, the 300$ Thunderbolt dock is a must have. This is a good laptop if you're a college student getting into GIS. Power GIS Laptop Targeted for full-time GIS folks that want to do all of their work on a laptop. What sets this one above the Budget Laptop is the screen size, the beefy video card which will take advantage of some Pro CUDA capability, and the memory. The only place I see adding more to this build is more memory. I have last years version of this laptop, and love it (but hate the &**(*(*!(*@&%$$!%^&! Thunderbolt Dock). Based on experience, you will not be getting any work done on this laptop in the economy row on a plane. It simply doesn't fit. Budget Workstation Targeted for folks that do some GIS as part of their job, and for GIS folks that support these folks. I really built this one to make me happy, not the user! This results in less help desk support a GIS person has to provide the non-GIS person and here's why: The I7, the video card, and the Class 40 drive will run your basic Pro project quite nicely. You'll note I added a serial riser card to be able to connect, for example, those old Hobo Sondes. To be honest, I wouldn't put any more money into this build given the audience that's going to use it. This build worked out quite nicely for us, as it resulted in some improvement with other software that these folks use (e.g STORET, Wildlife GPS Collar Software, etc..). However, if you're full-time GIS and on a budget, this will run Pro for the next three years. GIS Workstation This is for full-time GIS folks that have an understanding supervisor. If you support either a)a lot of users that need your services or b)a product line that includes GIS making money for your org, then your chain of command will support the 4000$ price tag. I put a lot of thought into this one, and in my opinion, this is the minimum you need to run Pro and meet the use case in a) and b) for the next 3 years. Let me exemplify a few use case scenarios on this build, as this is going to be the most common one for the audience of this post: You frequently run some kind of model that produces output used in a management decision (NEPA compliance) You frequently produce complex packages of many maps (e.g consultant that does 404/401 Wetland Permits). Arc Hydro will run nicely on this build! You have ADHD and run 4-5 Pro projects at once, each project has 10 maps and 20 layouts, and you connect to several different portals at once (don't forget to vote up https://community.esri.com/ideas/16753-giant-obnoxious-and-annoying-indicator-of-what-portal-youre-logged-into-like-trunk-monkey), and essentially, you frequently get nothing done. You frequently do some kind of raster "stuff" such as working with Landsat to do some kind of classification (e.g burned area severity), feature extraction, or cutting contour lines from Lidar Point Clouds. This will also run the LAS tools nicely, as well as ERDAS. You work in Geotech and do 3D "stuff" such as bore hole extrusion. There's a lot of places you can add and remove things. I'd bump up the ram and the video card if your work includes more use of 3D or Spatial Analyst. Money Means Nothing To You This one was kinda fun to build, I initially picked the most expensive of everything, and landed at 80,000$, but I kept it real for the audience. I got something slightly less expensive last year, and here's how I justified it: I frequently run very complex models using several software tools (R, Maxent, Pro) that output data and maps that satisfy legislative requirements on short notice I frequently produce complex map and data packages that need to get pushed out to a large audience on short notice (e.g printed maps as well as Avenza PDF maps) This was cheaper than paying my salary to watch the blue circle spinning. I deal with "Big Data" (I went with a cheaper source for the extra hard drives, not Dell) I wear many hats, and need to be able to rapidly respond to enterprise issues (e.g all the GIS servers need to be upgraded NOW, says IT in response to a CVE alert) I frequently produce non-GIS content such as video/photo production/editing that is consumed by a large audience (Story Maps) I produce a lot of Tile Packages (e.g 1800 at a time) You attend Lan parties (I don't, but imagine wheeling this into your WOWC meeting on a dolly, which is the only way you're moving this) You like the sound of jet planes taking off. On reboot, this is what it sounds like What set this build aside from what I got last year is the 128 GB of RAM and the 16 GB video card. If you're looking at this build, I really like that combination as it really opens up interesting windows for you to use Pro like a champ. I also built this one to run Pro for the next four years, and you're not likely to justify the cost every 3 years. In context, I had to get 6 years out of my last Money Means Nothing To You workstation. If money really means nothing to you, I'd go with dual P5000 video cards and RAID 5 the Class 50 drive(s). You'll note I added the USB-3 riser card, as I'm seeing a lot of USB-3 devices now, and the extra ports come in handy for a power GIS user.
... View more
05-31-2019
09:13 AM
|
4
|
17
|
39970
|
|
POST
|
Despite the warning, are you still able to make the edit?
... View more
05-31-2019
06:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1101
|
|
IDEA
|
I get the same user when logged into Portal and AGOL, and even with your screen shots, it's obvious that they're different, but still can't tell what you're logged into based on the user name, unless you can remember (which I can't).
... View more
05-30-2019
01:09 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2211
|
|
IDEA
|
I just spent many minutes looking for something in my on-prem Portal while in Catalog Pane, only to discover I was logged into AGOL. I use enterprise login for both, so there is no "obvious" indication of what Portal I'm logged into unless I move my mouse over the name in the upper-right of the Pro UI and click on it. I think it should look like this when you're logged into Portal: And when you're logged into AGOL
... View more
05-30-2019
12:30 PM
|
9
|
5
|
2495
|
|
POST
|
"checked all the specs with Esri requirements". That only means Pro will start. In order to do anything else (e.g project via wifi), in my experience, requires significantly more juice. I wonder if your OS is defaulting to the generic windows video card driver when you wifi project?
... View more
05-29-2019
03:55 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2956
|
|
POST
|
At start up, if you have catalog view activated, excessive calls to "Living Atlas" are being made. Fire up Wireshark when you're Pro install is starting up.
... View more
05-29-2019
03:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1930
|
|
POST
|
At 8 GB of Ram, you're in the "Recommended" hardware range (https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/get-started/arcgis-pro-system-requirements.htm), which means Pro will simply start. However, 8 GB is not enough for Pro to actually do anything (e.g open a project, save, etc...). From ESRI "The system requirements listed for ArcGIS Pro are the minimum requirements to open and run the software. " It has been our experience that 16 GB of RAM barely runs Pro, 32 "get's the job done", and if you spend your entire day doing GIS, sport for 48 or 64. If you're using the same machine as in this post (https://community.esri.com/thread/164355), I'm pretty confident that your video card (driver) is no longer compatible.
... View more
05-28-2019
04:36 AM
|
1
|
1
|
3371
|
|
POST
|
You might be encountering #BUG-000118068 ArcGIS Pro projects stored in the My Documents folder hosted on a network file share with an offline feature service takes up to 20 minutes to open.
... View more
05-28-2019
04:26 AM
|
1
|
0
|
5104
|
|
POST
|
Kory Kramer see my thread in the EAP on this topic.
... View more
05-22-2019
10:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2639
|
|
POST
|
Hmmm....from https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/sharing/overview/export-a-map-or-layout.htm "TIFFs also support georeferencing information in GeoTIFF tags or in a separate world file for use as raster data." suggests that you get the tags and wordfile in layout or map view, which suggests that what you are experiencing is a bug. I can't repro the extent issue, do you get the same problem with the same project on a different computer?
... View more
05-14-2019
11:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2355
|
|
POST
|
Sounds similar to https://community.esri.com/message/848906-re-arcgis-pro-224-exporting-only-square-central-portions-of-the-map-view-to-tif-or-pdf?commentID=848906#comment-848906, and for which I suspect the only solution is a call to tech support. Last comment in https://community.esri.com/ideas/3492 might also be the culprit. I am a bit surprised that you can't export tags in layout view in Pro, but you can in ArcMap (yes I have production mapping license on both), and wonder why that is disabled? Nor can you export a world file from Pro layout view?
... View more
05-14-2019
10:56 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2355
|
|
POST
|
So that's actually going to give you 16 virtual cores. I got dual 12 core xeons on my last workstation, having all those cores IMHO does more for Pro performance than memory.
... View more
05-09-2019
10:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5603
|
|
IDEA
|
I would caution...to make this an option. There are many use cases that support having the atty table from multiple maps open at once.
... View more
05-09-2019
09:22 AM
|
1
|
0
|
6573
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-17-2022 12:19 PM | |
| 1 | 03-14-2019 06:24 AM | |
| 1 | 07-12-2018 09:29 AM | |
| 1 | 06-27-2019 12:08 PM | |
| 2 | 09-23-2019 11:03 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-26-2026
07:12 AM
|