IDEA
|
Even if we could create a query with parameters for the user to complete, that would be helpful.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
156
|
IDEA
|
Our organization has the same needs as @TonyContreras_Frisco_TX
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
101
|
BLOG
|
I especially appreciate point 6! Expanding on, "they cannot possibly know everything" about a domain, I would add that it's okay to say you don't know the answer to something. For students, this is particularly relevant in job interviews, which can be very intense! There is pressure to "ace" an interview, but it's likely there will be a clever question that throws you off. A response that indicates you know how and where to find an answer can be almost as good as a correct answer. If you make an effort to utilize some of the sources mentioned by @JosephKerski, you'll know exactly how to respond to a question you don't know the answer to.
... View more
12-03-2024
10:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
181
|
POST
|
I also got this error in ArcGIS Pro 3.3.1 when trying to load all 139,396 rows in the attribute table of a feature class in a 10.8.1 enterprise geodatabase running on Oracle 19c. Failed to retrieve a page of rows. The event class for this subscription is in an invalid partition (0x8004020F) After clicking OK on the error, the attribute table closes. Trying again yields the same result.
... View more
11-13-2024
09:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
501
|
POST
|
@Wei_Ying I'm attempting to use the Feature Info widget as a replacement for the regular pop-up. When I add multiple layers and click on the map, the Feature Info widget only includes content for the first one highlighted instead of everything from the hit test of the click (like the pop-up does). Is there a way to get the Feature Info widget to display pop-up content from all the configured layers at once (like the pop-up does)?
... View more
09-17-2024
07:31 AM
|
0
|
1
|
643
|
IDEA
|
My first attempt to work with the query and filter widgets was to implement a way for the user to build their own SQL. The app I'm building has many layers that have different ways to search so it's not reasonable to build out every combination of SQL statements. Using the Search widget is not reasonable because the users need to specify more complex logic with AND/OR operators. Please consider adding this functionality in Experience Builder.
... View more
09-13-2024
03:36 PM
|
0
|
0
|
544
|
POST
|
I have noticed this too. @Jianxia, can you confirm if this is expected behavior in Experience Builder?
... View more
09-03-2024
04:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
172
|
IDEA
|
I would support the idea proposed by @AlfredBaldenweck. I think the idea is not to propose functionality that isn't possible, but rather to have the list functions follow a similar pattern to most other functions and have a parameter to explicitly set the workspace. It feels odd that you need to use arcpy.env.workspace (primarily) only when dealing with a list function, but not for most other things.
... View more
08-29-2024
12:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
536
|
POST
|
What product are you trying to connect to your license server?
... View more
08-28-2024
10:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
311
|
POST
|
Creating a circle line feature in Pro (3.3.1) exports to this Esri JSON: {
"displayFieldName" : "",
"fieldAliases" : {
"OBJECTID" : "OBJECTID",
"Shape_Length" : "Shape_Length",
"MyCustomField" : "MyCustomField"
},
"geometryType" : "esriGeometryPolyline",
"spatialReference" : {
"wkid" : 3008,
"latestWkid" : 3008
},
"fields" : [
{
"name" : "OBJECTID",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeOID",
"alias" : "OBJECTID"
},
{
"name" : "Shape_Length",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeDouble",
"alias" : "Shape_Length"
},
{
"name" : "MyCustomField",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeString",
"alias" : "MyCustomField",
"length" : 255
}
],
"features" : [{"attributes":{"OBJECTID":3,"Shape_Length":37416.412812405986,"MyCustomField":null},"geometry":{"curvePaths":[[[409829.45079999976,6584678.9290999994],{"a":[[409829.45079999976,6584678.9290999994],[404882.20972270775,6587993.5806217846],0,1]}]]}}]
} Creating an ellipse line feature in Pro (3.3.1) export to this Esri JSON: {
"displayFieldName" : "",
"fieldAliases" : {
"OBJECTID" : "OBJECTID",
"Shape_Length" : "Shape_Length",
"MyCustomField" : "MyCustomField"
},
"geometryType" : "esriGeometryPolyline",
"spatialReference" : {
"wkid" : 3008,
"latestWkid" : 3008
},
"fields" : [
{
"name" : "OBJECTID",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeOID",
"alias" : "OBJECTID"
},
{
"name" : "Shape_Length",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeDouble",
"alias" : "Shape_Length"
},
{
"name" : "MyCustomField",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeString",
"alias" : "MyCustomField",
"length" : 255
}
],
"features" : [{"attributes":{"OBJECTID":4,"Shape_Length":43604.943501478185,"MyCustomField":null},"geometry":{"curvePaths":[[[399919.55800000019,6592293.0635000002],{"a":[[399919.55800000019,6592293.0635000002],[403892.76152614655,6591110.3424503561],0,1,1.2814744564857963,9244.3980018598413,0.44843380967153262]}]]}}]
}
... View more
08-28-2024
10:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
107
|
POST
|
If you don't choose the "Output to GeoJSON" option and let it make "Esri JSON", it preserves the true curves. Here's a full example to test with a FeatureSet. {
"displayFieldName" : "",
"fieldAliases" : {
"OBJECTID" : "OBJECTID",
"Shape_Length" : "Shape_Length",
"MyCustomField" : "MyCustomField"
},
"geometryType" : "esriGeometryPolyline",
"spatialReference" : {
"wkid" : 3008,
"latestWkid" : 3008
},
"fields" : [
{
"name" : "OBJECTID",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeOID",
"alias" : "OBJECTID"
},
{
"name" : "Shape_Length",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeDouble",
"alias" : "Shape_Length"
},
{
"name" : "MyCustomField",
"type" : "esriFieldTypeString",
"alias" : "MyCustomField",
"length" : 255
}
],
"features" : [{"attributes":{"OBJECTID":2,"Shape_Length":21456.640390208202,"MyCustomField":"my value"},"geometry":{"curvePaths":[[[258018.72869999986,6677229.8190000001],{"c":[[268339.47780000046,6681063.2401000001],[260595.32177711991,6686102.864274309]]}]]}}]
}
... View more
08-28-2024
07:29 AM
|
0
|
2
|
588
|
POST
|
Using the Features to JSON gp tool and choosing the "Output to GeoJSON" option creates a file with .geojson extension. I just tested and I got fully completed JSON. Herer's an abbreviated example. {"type":"FeatureCollection","crs":{"type":"name","properties":{"name":"EPSG:3008"}},"features":
[{
"type":"Feature","id":1,"geometry":{
"type":"LineString","coordinates":[
[235902.8376000002,6695217.4102999996],
[235915.07869883571,6695060.7613401897],
... SNIP ...
[235928.1163439769,6694904.1766636735],
[218505.00329999998,6689909.5965]
]
},
"properties":{
"OBJECTID":1,
"Shape_Length":401574.90631927003,
"MyCustomField":"a value here"
}
}]
} The JSON you posted is all empty. It should have values. EDIT: I just noticed that Feature to JSON is simplifying the geometry into straight line segments instead of a curve. Sorry.
... View more
08-28-2024
07:14 AM
|
0
|
3
|
589
|
POST
|
Have you tried loading the JSON into a FeatureSet and copying it to a new feature class like the original solution suggested? fs = arcpy.FeatureSet()
fs.load(r'C:\path_to_your_json_file.json')
arcpy.management.CopyFeatures(fs, r'C:\some_folder\test_workspace.gdb')
... View more
08-27-2024
10:32 AM
|
0
|
5
|
623
|
POST
|
Yes, you can use the same method for creating regular (non-curve) polyline features. As for how to construct your GeoJSON, I don't have experience doing that with curves. I recommend reading the documentation. For practice, you can manually create sample features (with curves) in ArcGIS Pro, then export them to GeoJSON to see how the structure changes for different geometries.
... View more
08-26-2024
12:29 PM
|
0
|
7
|
667
|
POST
|
It looks like the geometry object in arcpy does not support the creation of true curves. Any true curves in the geometry will be densified into approximate curves in the WKT string. A possible workaround seems to be to create your feature as GeoJSON and load it in a FeatureSet, then copy the features.
... View more
08-26-2024
07:47 AM
|
0
|
9
|
701
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 10-24-2023 01:43 PM | |
2 | 08-23-2024 03:20 PM | |
2 | 07-31-2024 09:15 AM | |
1 | 07-29-2024 11:40 AM | |
1 | 05-21-2021 03:18 PM |