Latest Contributions by LanceCole

@SamComo, Looks like ESRI broke a few thing on their website.  The Bug is still listed as Confirmed/In Review" as of the moment in my ESRI.  Even that site is having issues.  I will check the link again on Monday to see if it is back up or if it needs updated.   ... View more

@dgregory_coconino, The database version can be found in ArcGIS Pro by right clicking on the SDE connection in Catalog and selecting Properties then General > Geodatabase Version. I would reach out to ESRI support.  They are great to work with and often call within minutes of posting a support ticket. Old Question: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/arcgis-pro-3-2-drawing-alerts-returning-state-id/m-p/1349945 New Question: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/re-arcgis-pro-3-2-drawing-alerts-returning-state/m-p/1515226#M86477 Sorry, I can pull out part of a question to a new one but not create a new title. ... View more

@dgregory_coconino, I moved your reply to a new question as I believe this is a different issue and the original question was closed. 1) Have you tried updating your Microsoft ODBC Driver 17 for SQL Server to the newest version compatible with the SQL and ArcGIS version you are utilizing in your environment.          ArcGIS 11.3 and ArcGIS Pro 3.3 requirements for Microsoft SQL Server 2) You may want to try using Microsoft ODBC Driver version 18.  You do need to address the encryption settings on your database to do so.          Encrypted connections to SQL Server databases  3) You noted you are running MS SQL 2017 and 3.3.1, what version is the database?          Client and geodatabase compatibility 4) Are  you having any network issues or limited resources on your SQL server   ... View more

@JackHardwick4, Unfortunately, this was determined to be a "Known Limit".  The details and noted solution of using annotations in ArcGIS Pro 2.x or moving to ArcGIS Enterprise 11 is listed in BUG-000151842 resolution.  We have subsequently moved to ArcGIS Pro 3.3.1 and ArcGIS Enterprise 11.3. ... View more

Just noted this morning BUG-000165670 and BUG-000163841 now included the issues are addressed in version 3.4 and 3.3.1.  Appears ESRI is planning an additional patch release before 3.4.   ... View more

@EarlMedina, Thanks for the post.  In ArcGIS Online we can export a File geodatabase (zipped) that contains the related data and use this to update a different feature service with the same schema.  However, ArcGIS Enterprise Portal does not support the use of a File geodatabase (zipped) for updates of feature services. Add and update features from a file (AGOL)  Add and update features from a file (Portal)  We are able to open this File geodatabase in ArcGIS Pro but have no way to update the related service on our Portal with the data and related tables.   ... View more

@Yarrr, Is this for imagery/raster or vector data? For our imagery and raster data, we created source mosaic datasets in their original coordinate system then used the source mosaic datasets to build a reference mosaic dataset in WGS84.   This allows multiple transformations to be applied and is reprojected on the fly in publishing out data to AGOL and building tile sets.  Source, derived, and referenced mosaic datasets I apologize, I do not remember the exact workflow we used for the vector data.  We did get it to work dynamically.  We since moved to NAD83(2011) which AGOL can transform in a single transformation without issue. I believe we applied a transformation on the map the feature data was published from to an intermediary coordinate system that AGOL could transform directly to WGS84.  For example, published the feature/map service from NAD83(86) to NAD83(HARN) then AGOL was able to correctly transform that to WGS84.  This workflow allowed us to keep or data in our coordinate system while dynamically publishing to AGOL with correct transformations. Taking control of transformations with hosted feature layers If you are generating your tile cache in Pro and exporting. It does not appear you can apply transformations as part of these geoprocessing tools.  However: 1) You can try modifying the transformation applied to the map you are generating the tiles from including a few combination transformations.  The default for WGS84 to NAD 83 is (WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983).  Try a few others such as: (WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983_HARN + NAD_1983_HARN_To_HARN Florida) (NAD_1983_HARN_To_ WGS_1984 + NAD_1983_To_HARN Florida) 2) Use the Project (Data Management) tool,  which allows the application of multiple/combination transformations to be applied, and create a temporary feature in WGS84 to generate your tiles from.  This may be the best option for you since you are generating and exporting your tile sets in Pro. The selection of the applicable transformations really depends on the coordinate system of your original data and how to get it to WGS84.  AGOL automatically applies a single transformation to the source data and it does its best to select the correct transformation.  Currently, AGOL cannot apply multiple transformations, combination transformations (noted above) and will not apply any transformation if it cannot determine the correct one to apply. I hope this helps and have a great evening.   ... View more

@Yarrr,  What is the coordinate system of your original data?   Are you projecting your data to WGS84 before publishing?  If so, are you using the correct transformation(s). AGOL basically only works with the WGS84 coordinate system and will do its best to project source data to that coordinate system.  However, with a limited number of transformations available.  For example, we store all or data in Ohio North State Plane, US FT, NAD83/86.  If I use this data in AGOL we will see a 1.5-2.0 shift in the data because it applies the NAD83 to WGS84 transformation by default.  However, if we project our data to WGS84 using the NAD83(86) to NAD83 Ohio HARN transformation first then the NAD83 to WGS84 transformation it is spot on.  Unfortunately AGOL does not currently have the ability to apply multiple transformations. ... View more

@BrandenHarding,  I updated the BUG-000166278 link above to the correct public format.  It is still showing as under consideration.  As the bug has not yet been prioritized, I would recommend reporting your issue through ESRI support. ... View more