IDEA
|
Found this idea in frustration of seeing the cursor; I complete agree.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
167
|
POST
|
@AmberConverse you should try disabling the local indexing to see if that makes a difference for you. It was immediately faster to rename after doing so.
... View more
09-20-2023
07:48 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1264
|
POST
|
I found this thread and disabled indexing. This worked for me.
... View more
09-06-2023
08:33 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1296
|
IDEA
|
Is this not what you are after? I could be reading into this wrong. I followed the comment above and it did work for me. You share the map, make it copied to server instead of referenced, and split each layer from your TOC into it's own web feature layer. I end up with individual rest endpoints for each layer, with exactly one layer in each one.
... View more
09-01-2023
07:10 AM
|
0
|
0
|
543
|
IDEA
|
I'm always amazed when I find good, reasonable ideas that have been here for years. Take this for example, it's got a good use case, it's been suggested as an idea, a few people have liked it, but here it sits 7 years later! Suppressing messages needs to be implemented in model building.
... View more
05-17-2023
10:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
199
|
POST
|
First run the Split Line At Vertices. Then add a field to the result called curveCount. Then Calculate Geometry to it using the Number of Curves option. The result will be 1 for curve or 0 for not curve.
... View more
02-10-2023
12:24 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2531
|
POST
|
I am using the getWebLayerSharingDraft --> exportToSDDraft --> StageService_server --> content.add --> item.publish method of updating a hosted feature layer with new data. This has been working perfectly. Now, for no reason so far as I can tell, my SD file will upload to AGOL but the next publishing step fails with "Job Failed". One note - after a successful publish, the code goes on to delete the Service Definition item. The service definition file appears to be delete protected now. I see both the hosted feature layer and the service definition file in my AGOL content. In ArcGIS Online, the Feature Layer (hosted) item says it was updated Feb 7, yet in the Details section on the right panel, it says "Data updated: Jan 28. Log result for below: Creating SD file exportToSDDraft Connecting to https://arcgis.com/ GIS @ https://pottcounty.maps.arcgis.com version:10.3 added Job failed. sharing_draft = mp.getWebLayerSharingDraft("HOSTING_SERVER", "FEATURE", sd_fs_name)
sharing_draft.summary = ""
sharing_draft.tags = ""
sharing_draft.description = ""
sharing_draft.credits = ""
sharing_draft.useLimitations = ""
sharing_draft.offline = True
sharing_draft.overwriteExistingService = True
## # Create Service Definition Draft file
print ("exportToSDDraft")
sharing_draft.exportToSDDraft(sddraft)
## # Stage Service
try:
arcpy.StageService_server(sddraft, sd)
warnings = arcpy.GetMessages(1)
print(warnings)
except Exception as stage_exception:
print("Sddraft not staged. Analyzer errors encountered - {}".format(str(stage_exception)))
print("Connecting to {}".format(portal))
gis = GIS(portal, user, password)
print(gis)
#######
item = gis.content.add({"overwrite": True},sd)
print ("added")
published_item = item.publish(overwrite=True)
print ("published")
... View more
02-07-2023
07:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
290
|
IDEA
|
@Sarah_of_Lubbock I have found a work around that does the job. In ArcGIS Online, go to Organization -> Settings -> Security -> Information Banner. You can style something here to make it obvious!
... View more
02-07-2023
06:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1181
|
IDEA
|
*Edited for correctness: That's true. Python 2.7 did eventually work, but only after repairing the paths.
... View more
09-09-2022
09:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2514
|
IDEA
|
@ChestonDobbins the issue is about paths. Declared variables, field maps for appends, etc are all broken by this change. Parcels = "\\\\files\\GIS\\Scripts\\Database Connections\\ParcelFabric.sde\\ParcelFabric.DBO.ParcelEditing\\ParcelFabric.DBO.ParcelFabric_Parcels"
arcpy.Append_management("Subdivisions", "Sub_FabricExport", "NO_TEST", "Sub_Name \"Sub_Name\" true true false 255 Text 0 0 ,First,#,\\\\files\\GIS\\Scripts\\Database Connections\\ParcelFabric.sde\\ParcelFabric.DBO.ParcelEditing\\ParcelFabric.DBO.ParcelFabric_Parcels"
... View more
09-09-2022
06:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2533
|
IDEA
|
Thank you for the reply. I am aware that this is new, expected functionality. However, it furthers my suggested idea. The GP tool that performs this upgrade, in my opinion, should warn SQL Server users of this change in the documentation, as it affects every single enterprise SQL database prior to v11. I do not think the release notes are in peoples minds as they are referencing this tool's help; they weren't in mind. It is a major change, one worthy of a note in the documentation. I think it will save other customers from facing major problems like I had.
... View more
09-06-2022
11:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2609
|
IDEA
|
I recently upgraded a version 10.8.1 enterprise SQL Server geodatabase to version 11 using ArcGIS Pro 3.0 Upgrade Geodatabase GP tool. Doing so, come to find out by design, altered the way the geodatabase items are named. In v11 it no longer uses the [databasename].[schema].[tablename] format and is now only [schema].[tablename]. This change broke all of my enterprise paths in models and python scripts for things like feature class paths, field mapping paths, etc. I wasn't expecting that, and it was a big chore to repair. Please update the documentation to warn of that change when upgrading between geodatabase versions prior to v11. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/manage-sql-server/upgrade-geodatabase-sqlserver.htm
... View more
09-06-2022
11:15 AM
|
6
|
22
|
4289
|
POST
|
Interesting @jcarlson! So I have to ask, if @anna_garrett is using the enterprise variety of the Fabric, would WAB Parcel Drafter allow her to configure the Future_parcel type polys and lines that she's created as inputs? Do the base fabric feature classes that are published contain all the required fields/types needed for Parcel Drafter? Or does it require specific hosted feature layers to be configured?
... View more
08-16-2022
07:59 AM
|
0
|
2
|
983
|
POST
|
Thank you for the long answer. Using a different parcel type like you will work very good for me. I hear what you are saying for the construction process. I will try your steps! I am going to leave this without accepting your answer as the solution for now to see if any additional good ideas come in. That said, your answer was great, and I will mark it.
... View more
08-16-2022
07:05 AM
|
1
|
1
|
990
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 09-20-2023 07:48 AM | |
6 | 09-06-2022 11:15 AM | |
1 | 08-16-2022 07:05 AM | |
1 | 09-14-2020 12:49 PM | |
4 | 02-11-2022 10:23 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|