IDEA
|
Hi, with the announcements around Gaussian splat support in ArcGIS pro 3.6, can we please get an update on what file formats are supported, including industry standards such as ply and spz. i hope that ArcGIS pro will be interoperable with other reality model generation tools that are outside the Esri ecosystem. thanks, Marc
... View more
Monday
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
POST
|
Hi, I have to say "Adding this functionality to Scene Viewer is in our backlog but not yet planned for a specific release." is pretty disappointing. ArcGIS Online was released in 2012. That's 13 years ago. To still not have simple support for line labelling in the platform's 3d viewer is unfortunate, to not even have it planned for release is outrageous. Surely basic functionality such as labels for standard GIS data types in your "premier" 3d gis viewer should be top of the list. To this question: "Could you please share any insights to your workflows or use cases you are trying to solve?" - we need to be able to label 3d contours for Airport Obstacle Limitation surfaces. I know we could generate points on the contours and label those, but that's additional layers and analysis to solve a problem that IMO shouldn't exist. Sorry for the rant and thanks, Marc
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
48
|
IDEA
|
Hi, The tool that is supplied in the ArcGIS Aviation Product Data generates 3D Contour extents, but 2D Contours. Can you please enhance it to generate 3D Contours by adding "Feature to 3D by Attribute" and converting the 2D contours to 3D polylines? Thanks, Marc
... View more
a week ago
|
2
|
0
|
109
|
IDEA
|
Hi there, When I create a multi runway OLS, some times I only want the merged surfaces. please give me the option to only create these, not to create all the other surfaces and then have to delete them leaving behind only the merged surfaces. e.g. change this: to: Or similar. Thanks, Marc
... View more
a week ago
|
2
|
0
|
80
|
IDEA
|
Hi @MichaelDavidsonPM That’s a fair point. I’d like you to consider however, providing the user the option. On deletion of the Esri layer you could prompt the user: there is an associated cad layer xyzx. Would you like to remove this also? The user can choose to or not, depending on whether they have added additional features. They should know if they have. This could be a good middle ground, of simplifying the cad layer management, while providing a decision point for the user to think, is this what I want. cheers, Marc
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
56
|
BLOG
|
Absolutely understand. thanks for replying, I’ll find someone who can help me build it. cheers for sharing your work!
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
443
|
BLOG
|
Hi @Brian_McLeer I tried to deploy this to my ArcGIS Enterprise Portal, but it appears that the widget only supports developer edition as there is no dist folder only src. Are you able to release compiled versions of the widget suitable for ArcGIS Enterprise? Thanks, Marc
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
476
|
IDEA
|
Hi, Where we have complex BIM models that intersect with the ground, we need the ability to cut a hole in the Ground surface, similar to how ArcGIS Pro works. Currently if there is a dem with a NoData area, this gets replaced with a default surface at 0 elevation. I would suggest that there could be an option in the scene to turn this off, and ONLY display terrain where there are valid ground cells. Additionally the ability to mask out parts of the ground in the same way we can mask out integrated mesh layers would be very useful. This would let us use publicly available elevation services as ground, and remove the bits we don't need, replacing them with our BIM models. Thanks, Marc
... View more
a month ago
|
7
|
0
|
181
|
POST
|
Hi @SCourter Is there any way to override the geodesic calculations to use the projected coordinate system of the input data? The geodesic nature of the calculations and the resulting slight differences in the output from what is expected in the PCS is causing issues with our workflows. Example: In NZ the inner horizontal surface and conical surfaces are defined from the edge of the strip, not from the runway centerline. I can approximate this quite well by offsetting the runway to either side by half the strip width (eg. 280/2 = 140 either side). However all the ArcGIS editing tools work in planar coordinates, not geodesic, and so my new runway centerlines don't line up with the generated OIS runway strip edges. These issues just compound at greater distances, as I mentioned in my original post. Another example: say we want to generate labeled points showing distances from the end of the runway strip. This measures from the geometry, which uses the PCS: In my previous response I said 3.5m over 15km isn't enough to be concerned about, but given that there are going to be a bunch of little issues that potentially arise from it, I'm starting to think otherwise. Thanks, Marc
... View more
08-27-2025
06:35 PM
|
0
|
1
|
224
|
POST
|
Hi @SCourter and @Koeller_Christine_A_-_DOT Of course you are both right, when measuring in geodesic I get the correct distance. We created this surface using Precision Approach Category I Code Number 3 4 I am interested to know what the standard approach for this sort of work is. We have traditionally built our surfaces in CAD, and I don't know if this has come up before. To be honest 3.5m across 15km isn't worth worrying about, however it is good to know this is the cause. Thanks for your help, Marc
... View more
08-27-2025
03:12 PM
|
0
|
0
|
231
|
POST
|
Hi there, I just generated a 15km long approach surface using the customise json tool: and it is short by approximately 3.5 meters. The blue line is the extent generated by the ArcGIS Airports GP tool: The red area is from a dwg generated using an alternative CAD based method: All Data is projected in NZTM/NZVD2016, both in ArcGIS Pro and in the input CAD dataset. The measurements are made in ArcGIS Pro 3.3.5 and all scenes/maps are also in the same coordinate system. Any ideas what could be causing this difference? Thanks, Marc
... View more
08-26-2025
08:24 PM
|
0
|
5
|
311
|
POST
|
We narrowed it down to a web Mercator hosted feature service in a non-web Mercator scene. Try adding some services to a scene where the projections don’t match and see if you can trigger the error.
... View more
08-12-2025
12:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
192
|
IDEA
|
Hi there, If you try and publish a layer from ArcGIS Pro and there exists a layer with the same name in the recycle bin you see an error: Please give the user the ability to remove this web layer from the recycle bin if they have the ability to do so from within this dialog box. It would be a big QoL improvement. Also, please identify this issue in the analyze stage before attempting to publish, and give an option to remove the layer from there, or take the user to the recycle bin from the context menu. Or, when you delete a layer to the recycle bin why not append _yymmddhhmmss to the layer name, so future publishing is not impacted. Thanks, Marc
... View more
08-10-2025
07:04 PM
|
3
|
0
|
156
|
IDEA
|
It's unfortunate that annotation is not supported in Vector tiles. It seems to align well with the cartographic nature of vector tile layers as a basemap.
... View more
08-10-2025
07:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
69
|
POST
|
Hi @KimiaK I am planning an upgrade from 11.3 to 11.5 This issue has me concerned. I would like to upgrade knowing a patch is coming. Can you please confirm if this will be addressed in a patch soon, or if it will be delayed until ArcGIS Enterprise 12? Thanks, Marc
... View more
07-21-2025
04:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1249
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
2 | a week ago | |
2 | a week ago | |
7 | a month ago | |
3 | 08-10-2025 07:04 PM | |
1 | 07-21-2025 03:41 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Tuesday
|