IDEA
|
It would be great if the pdf export from Insights maintained the vectors of the visualizations. This is necessary if you are doing any professional printing or work with graphic designers. The quality of the image exports does not work for all publishable material, but a vector based export would allow for the visualizations to be used in any size or media without having to completely recreate it in a vector based software.
... View more
08-24-2023
09:52 AM
|
0
|
1
|
311
|
POST
|
The already configured dynamic charts would be very useful to share with a broader group besides the data curators with logins. I can share the analysis url with those with account logins or make everything public, however, I would like to share the already configured charts and graphs in a public way with the possibility of hiding some fields. This way public contributors or others that are interested in these data can see the patterns and trends, but keep unnecessary or sensitive fields hidden. Rebuilding them in dashboard has been problematic with multiple choice questions, and a pdf is only a static glance and not helpful for a survey that is continually being added to overtime. If sharing only the analysis page in this way is not possible, has there been considerations from the Survey123 development team in making sharing results easier for public data or better integration of the Survey123 data in Dashboards?
... View more
07-21-2020
08:52 AM
|
1
|
1
|
504
|
IDEA
|
The newest or newer update to the basemap topographic option "world topographic map (v2)" in the basemap selection overrides the previous basemaps also titled topographic or "world topographic map". For maps and apps that relied on the original topographic map, the new version is completely different and does not serve the same purpose causing problems with already created products. Besides making a whole new color palette that may not match already created product styles, there are no topo lines in v2. This not only contradicts the name of this basemap but for products that needed the topo lines like in the original product, this override is a big problem. Why not name the new version something different that more closely reflects what it is displaying (i.e. hillshade with some administrative boundaries) and give both options in the basemap selector instead of replacing the actual topographic map with the new one? This way already created products won't be obsolete but instead expanded on. Also, when something is named topographic, you expect it to actually be a topographic map. This is confusing not only to web map developers but for the end user as well. For us building the web map, we can, of course, search for the old version and still use it, but in web applications that only have the basemap selector, this replacement is a big problem. Here is an example in an elevation profile map that we use. To the left is the original version with topo lines and detailed labels and the replacement to the right of the same location without topo lines and far fewer labels. If you want to try it yourself to see the difference here is the East Rim Trail example used above. The initial load will be the original topo map, but if you switch the basemap to topographic in the basemap selector it will change to the new one. After the switch the only way to get the original back is to reload the page.
... View more
03-08-2019
09:21 AM
|
3
|
0
|
512
|
POST
|
Thank you for that clarification. I'm glad to hear that it is being worked on! Do you know if that update or another might also allow for a more seamless cell edit similar to how Desktop functions in an editing session instead of having to double click to edit each cell?
... View more
01-18-2019
11:24 AM
|
0
|
1
|
700
|
POST
|
That's disappointing! Cell by cell is part of the problem in our workflow. Thanks for the quick reply.
... View more
01-18-2019
10:04 AM
|
0
|
3
|
700
|
POST
|
Does anyone know when this might be addressed with newer versions of pro? The bug report for BUG-000111428 says it is in product plan, but the report that is excel specific says it is not in the product plan. Since these bug reports are from a year ago, I curious when and if they will be addressed. Not having this feature or a more seamless table edit workflow without double-clicking is slowing down simple data maintenance tasks.
... View more
01-18-2019
09:08 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2268
|
POST
|
Thank you, I was able to publish the survey successfully this morning!
... View more
07-25-2018
09:37 AM
|
1
|
0
|
5762
|
POST
|
I can see how that would cause a problem. However, I think the difference with my problem is that I have built my survey completely on survey123.arcgis.com. I did not use the Connect where you have access to a form like in your image. In the online survey, I changed the text in a description field and two words in one of single choice field. I did not change field names. I also did not change anything in the schema—that option is locked after a survey is published. On July 1st, I made more complex changes to the survey and added questions (fields) and was able to publish with no issues. I'm wondering if this is a bug in the new 3.0 edition...? I will pull the survey into Connect to see if I spot anything like you mention.
... View more
07-18-2018
08:06 AM
|
1
|
3
|
5762
|
POST
|
I have a previously published survey on Survey123 online. I made a small text edit yesterday to an already existing question in the survey. I did not add any new questions, fields, etc. This is a survey created online with no customization. When I try to publish it again after saving my change, I am getting the following message: There has been a problem trying to replace ${} with the XPath to the survey element named ''. There is no survey element with this name. Does anyone know why I might suddenly be getting this message?
... View more
07-17-2018
11:49 AM
|
0
|
10
|
7212
|
POST
|
This is what I thought the answer might be. Thank you!
... View more
06-04-2018
08:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
416
|
POST
|
I have a public survey created on Survey123 online. I need users to submit images but the results (data/mapped features) need to be private, so personal information is not shared. I have followed directions via several blogs and other threads to set my editing as follows in the image below. When I test the survey I get an error message that it can not include attachments (images). Is this a limitation when limiting what features editors can see, or did I set something up incorrectly? View of my permissions on my Feature layer (hosted, view).
... View more
06-01-2018
01:06 PM
|
0
|
2
|
557
|
POST
|
Thank you! I have made the application http. Scene maps and most pages are working properly. Note: I checked My Stories prior to starting this thread, and it did not diagnose this issue.
... View more
02-24-2016
12:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
580
|
POST
|
I am embedding a website (http not https) in the story journal. When I test the link it will not move past the loading icon. I am having the same problem in both the ArcGIS Online hosted application and hosting it ourselves (see images below). Embedded maps, videos, and images load fine. Scene maps also won't load since they are embedded via URLs. I reviewed the following thread that had a similar issues, but I am not using https URLs. Does anyone have any suggestions?
... View more
02-24-2016
10:36 AM
|
0
|
2
|
4727
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 07-21-2020 08:52 AM | |
3 | 03-08-2019 09:21 AM | |
1 | 07-18-2018 08:06 AM | |
1 | 07-25-2018 09:37 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
03-05-2024
05:43 PM
|