Latest Contributions by NiekGoorman1

Hi @MatthewTsui5 , I think we currently restart our servers regularly, but we plan to decrease that to be done only occasionally as it's not usually necessary. ArcGIS Server restarts its services every 24 hours anyway.  As a sidenote, if you're still running 10.9.1 you should be upgrading soon as extended supports ends at the end of november - meaning no more security patches. ... View more

I'm seeing it as well - most likely related to the global IT issues affecting all sorts of organisations at the moment. ... View more

The one thing you could do is to move your Pro licenses to Enterprise or AGOL and use named user licensing. That way you won't need a license manager anymore for most licenses (there are some exceptions). Upgrading the license manager is a pretty trivial task though. If your IT department is willing to upgrade ArcGIS Pro but not the license manager, then that is really an organisational issue and your best option is to find someone high enough in the org tree to yell at them until they give in 😉 Lastly, running Pro 3.2 against such an old version of Enterprise might cause issues - I recommend you study closely the compatibility and possibly issues between the two. And I'm sure you're aware but 10.7.1 is already in mature support and will be retired by June next year. ... View more

Keep in mind that 3.2 requires a license manager upgrade - for those using concurrent licensing or named user through Enterprise. ... View more

Keep in mind that 11.2 will be a short-term release in terms of support, similar to 11.0. See: ArcGIS Enterprise Life Cycle | Esri Support (although 11.2 hasn't been added yet as of now). ... View more

Just thinking off the top of my head here, but could you perhaps make a copy of your feature class to a table? Then you delete any field you don't need and are left with just your Rezone field and some unique ID you can use for the relationship. Then you delete the Rezone field from your main feature class and you're done. ... View more

I'm adding my support to this request. Currently our surveyors use ArcMap to generate schema-only checkout replicas, which is not currently possibly in ArcGIS Pro (to the best of my knowledge). @SSWoodward I would like to add that the ArcMap tool allows users to choose per feature class whether they want to extract its data or schema-only. A similar tool for ArcGIS Pro should allow this as well. ... View more

Yes this is needed. The Group Filter widget in the WAB is immensely useful. edit: FYI the Functionality Matrix claims that the Group Filter widget is planned to be added to the Experience Builder: Functionality Matrix for Web AppBuilder and Experi... - Esri Community ... View more

If it's not in 11.1 then we may need to wait to upgrade our Enterprise portal 😕 ... View more

Hi @NaicongLi @KoryKramer ,   Can I request that this functionality is expanded? At the moment the 'Categories' filter only shows under Catalog --> My Organisation, but as soon as you go to the 'Groups' pane and enter a group, you can no longer filter by category. As my organisation keeps all its authoritative layers in one group, this would come in really handy. Thank you. ... View more

Viewing related records is now available in ArcGIS Online (see November update details). From there I expect it'll come to the next major version of Enterprise. ... View more

Hi, we've had a 10.7.1 ArcGIS Enterprise install running on Azure VMs with SQL SDEs hosted in Azure as well. You can connect to it from other locations fine (e.g. ArcGIS Desktop) but it will be slow. For some SDE-intensive work I temporarily spun up an Azure VM to speed things up. ... View more

I didn't know that either - thanks for the heads up. You might be able to bring in related data using Arcade expressions, especially if it's just a couple of fields. ... View more

It sounds from the error message that the huge number of columns is more than your database can handle. Try removing some columns or shortening the field names and see if that resolves the issue. ... View more