|
POST
|
The asset package does convert the GlobalID field to a Guid and disable editor tracking. You might want to delete the GlobalID field(type GUID) and re-add it. Also enable editor tracking.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
180
|
|
POST
|
Marco, I can repo it on my dataset too. Definitely seems like a bug. I would log it.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
158
|
|
POST
|
Attribute Rules can only access tables in their own database. But there is a trick - https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/creating-attribute-rules-to-access-feature-classes-in-a-000032146
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
95
|
|
POST
|
Can you recreate the rule using the new templated AR and see if that changes anything?
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
94
|
|
POST
|
Are all the layers in the same service? Are you deleting the point on the insert? If so, that could cause issues. I ran into similar things in the Abandon Features rule. Deleting $feature in an update/insert call does some bad things. I ended up using a Batch Calc Rule that would find all features marked for deleting and deleting them at a later time.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
1
|
68
|
|
POST
|
Take a look at the templated rule - Generate ID. It has a option "Sequence by lookup" that could use an unique seq for grid. The templated rule writes the arcade, which you could modify to also get an ID field from the intersected layer. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/generate-id-attribute-rule.htm#LI_A9FBB4CFF1C5407D9F9A092ABDF2FC3A
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
2
|
134
|
|
POST
|
Phase Change or the Network Attribute configured for phase propagation should only ever be set at locations where phase changes or deviates. This allows the system to calculate the downstream phase without the editor have to make downstream edits.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
42
|
|
POST
|
BTW, if you want that valve in the results, you can use a Find Connected Trace instead of the Isolation Trace.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
1
|
1
|
173
|
|
POST
|
Ok, that picture helps. That valve is isolated by closing the other valves. So to isolate that area, that valve going into the cul-de-sac does not need to be closed. Now field operations, might choose to close that value, so the pipe is not drained and then does not have to be disinfected. But that valve is not required to be closed to isolate the area.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
2
|
0
|
176
|
|
POST
|
What do the results look like if you return all isolated features?
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
3
|
218
|
|
POST
|
Hmm. Well it could be two things A: Using Phases Normal instead of Phase Change could be setting the phases energize. I do not think it is this though. That should only be set if the propagator can reach the asset, which it appears it cannot since the subnetwork trace stops B: Since the value was set and now the propagator cannot reach it, it does not know it has to reset it.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
117
|
|
POST
|
If you do a subnetwork trace, does it select that downstream line? If you place a barrier pass that line? We need to find if there is a loop somewhere.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
123
|
|
POST
|
What is the other unit? Do both units have a phase change set? If the other unit does not and not open, that is allowing the phase to push through.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
259
|
|
POST
|
That device is the barrier, so one side is techincally energized, so it gets the phases energized field. Even if you turn off "Include Barriers" in the subnetwork definition, since it has a multi terminal configuration, it will still get the energized value. The features downstream are reporting De-Energized, correct?
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
1
|
1
|
332
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 2 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 10-24-2025 10:04 AM | |
| 1 | 10-09-2025 05:29 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|