|
POST
|
Are you trying to use the c_assocation table in import association? That table is not compatible. Try using the Transfer Utility Network data tool(in UDMS - https://github.com/Esri/Utility-Data-Management-Support-Tools). This will convert the c_assocation table to the correct format. You can create associations regardless of enabled state, I would be shocked if import is failing because it is disabled.
... View more
3 hours ago
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
|
POST
|
The format of the csv from Export Association is not the same as the format of the C_Association table. You need to ensure the rows are correct. From/To Domain network is a coded value domain where the code is an int that represents the domain The Class does not include the prefix Content visible is a int based domain also(0/1)
... View more
3 hours ago
|
0
|
0
|
34
|
|
POST
|
Could go crazy and have X copies of the MGDB and then run traces in separate ones in sub processes. Just throwing out ideas.
... View more
a week ago
|
1
|
0
|
87
|
|
POST
|
I would not suggest doing this on the prod UN servers. Copy and Paste or recreate the UN in a MGDB via the asset package. If you are going to use Enterprise, you should parallelize the traces, and run maybe 8 concurrently.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
2
|
107
|
|
POST
|
The UN_# represents the Dataset ID of the Utility Network. This is defined when the database is created, as this represents the ObjectID of that item in the GDB Items table. This cannot change during enable/disable. Only if you delete/recreate the database. Are you sure you are connected to the correct service? Did you reload your data? Are you referring to the Layer ID of the Feature Service? If so, you should always assign a unique ID to them in your map prior to publishing.
... View more
a week ago
|
3
|
0
|
186
|
|
POST
|
You can model the pipe connections as devices. You do not have to use stormwater junctions. Can you provide a schema only UN and I can look into why the snapping is not working. Snapping is not enabled for Structure Junctions to Stormwater Pipes, as you cannot create a rule for this. You can always right click and select snap to though.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
1
|
1
|
461
|
|
POST
|
Two isolation traces are the only way that I know how to achieve this.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
171
|
|
POST
|
Do you have all the rules in a built UN? If so, I would just export the UN to an asset package, then copy the b_rules table from the exported asset package to the source asset package(deleting the b_rules table first). If not, you can use the rules matrix from the UDMS toolbox: https://github.com/Esri/Utility-Data-Management-Support-Tools https://esri.github.io/Utility-Data-Management-Support-Tools/docs/3.5/ExportUtilityNetworkMatrix.html
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
1
|
1
|
558
|
|
POST
|
In hierarchical, it must be valid in the parent to be allowed to add to the child. Add it to System, then it will show as an option in the isolation.
... View more
a month ago
|
2
|
1
|
197
|
|
POST
|
Then you need to disable the Set Attributes from Z attribute rule. That is overriding your values with the Z of the line.
... View more
a month ago
|
1
|
1
|
1080
|
|
POST
|
If you want to copy the Manhole elevation attribute to the Pipe, then I would look at the Spatial Join Templated Attribute rule. You should be able to configure it for your needs. https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/data-management/attribute-rules-generate-spatial-join
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
735
|
|
POST
|
Edit, We do not have an Attribute Rule to set the Z's or attribute of the From/To elevation from the snapped feature. The rule you posted just calculates the slope of the line via the From/To Elevation. There is a rule to Set the From / To elevations from the Z. We rely on ArcGIS Pro and snapping to copy the Z to the geometry. How did you draw the sewer main? Was it snapped to the manhole on create? Did the manhole have a Z?
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
3
|
735
|
|
POST
|
Are you using the pressure zone tier? If so, running your isolation trace on that tier could speed things up. How many controllers do you have on the system tier?
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
670
|
|
POST
|
Would be interested in seeing the same batch trace run from a script, outside pro. 30 secs a trace is not good. Nothing batch trace can do about that. I think it is the gp tool overhead of running inside pro. You have 9 maps and one active. The trace is communicating with those maps. Try it in pro with no maps, you will see a huge improvement
... View more
12-14-2025
06:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
760
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | a week ago | |
| 3 | a week ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 4 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
6 hours ago
|